China's 'Historic' Drop In Coal Use Is Baloney 

China's 'Historic' Drop in Coal Use Is Baloney

Like a smoker who keeps trying to quit but sneaks a drag when he thinks nobody's looking, China is slowly weaning itself off coal. Last winter, the Chinese government released preliminary statistics showing that its coal consumption had dropped 2.9 per cent in 2014. But that number may be obfuscating the truth about China's coal use — and about how quickly its carbon emissions are declining. A study published this week in Nature Climate Change takes a close look at what China's "historic" 2014 reduction in coal consumption actually meant. When the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics reported that 2.9 per cent figure, the International Energy Agency used it to estimate that China's overall carbon emissions had fallen by 1.5 per cent. Because China accounts for nearly a third of all carbon emissions worldwide, this drove humanity's collective carbon footprint down by 0.2 per cent. Progress!

Well, not exactly. As Jan Ivar Korsbakken, a senior climate economics researcher at CICERO points out, a reduction in the amount of coal a country consumes by weight doesn't necessarily translate into lower emissions. That's because you have to account for the energy content of the coal, too — some coal is more carbon-rich than other coal. In the case of China, coal consumption fell by 2.9 per cent in 2014, but the overall energy density went up.

It's like trying to lose weight by cutting your overall food intake, but in the process, trading fruits and veggies for cheese and chocolate. When Korsbakken and his co-authors took this detail into account, they found that China's carbon emissions actually increased in 2014, by 0.8 per cent.

"The subtext here is whether there are substantial differences between reported and actual emissions," Rob Jackson, an Earth scientist at Standford University who was not involved with the study told Gizmodo in an email. "Even if China's coal use dropped 2.9 per cent in 2014, you can't equate this with a similar drop in CO2 emissions."

China does not have a great track record when it comes to reporting energy use: Its statistics are routinely revised, and often contain tremendous gaping holes. But given the country's outsized influence on global carbon emissions, those statistics matter a lot. For instance, it came to light last fall that China was burning up to 17 per cent more coal than the government had previously claimed, an amount that equated to 70 per cent of the United States' total annual coal consumption. China isn't winning any climate prizes with an error margin of 20 per cent.

On a brighter note, it seems that China's overall coal usage really is falling. The country reported even steeper coal reductions — 3.7 per cent — in 2015, which, Korsbakken and his colleagues conclude, "makes it likely that the stagnation in coal use in 2014 was real and the start of at least a short-term trend". At the same time, China continues to make major investments in wind and solar technology.

The question is whether China can decarbonise fast enough to live up to the ambitious climate pledge it made in Paris last December. And whether the rest of us can believe it if we read it.

[Nature Climate Change h/t Climate Central]

Top: Cars at a smog-filled intersection in Beijing in December 2015. Image: Mark Schiefelbein/AP


Comments

    Why the glee at the major manufacturing nation struggling with carbon emissions? Its not like we here in Oz are doing any better.

    I guess the take away from this is *at least they are trying* Their solar capacity is increasing exponentially each year and is already at unbelievable levels, while they still have a long way to go to make a dent in their even more unbelievable levels of energy usage, again, at least they are trying, which is more than we can say for our shitty government.

    With China its not just about combatting climate change. Their reasons include the more apparently urgent and selfish concerns of deadly, economy crippling air pollution, and energy security. Half of coal mined worldwide each year is mined in china, yet still they need to import even more to meet demand, but China only has 30 years of coal reserves left at current consumption, meaning: coal - even if it didn't kill people, and the planet - is unsustainable, at least for the worlds biggest economy.

    The subeditor who wrote the headline ought to find a new job. The conclusion of the article is "China’s overall coal usage really is falling", the opposite of what the headline claims.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now