Don't Believe Facebook's Claim That 'Six Degrees Of Separation' Is Bogus

Don't Believe Facebook's Claim That 'Six Degrees of Separation' Is Bogus

Yesterday, a Facebook post revealed that each Facebook user is an average of only 3.57 connections away from all users on the site. That by itself is interesting, but instead, Facebook's comparing it to the popular theory of six degrees of separation — presenting its user base and the general population as two groups that, hell, may as well be considered one in the same! The post starts with a description of six degrees of separation: The notion that it takes just six social connections to link you with every human on Earth. But Facebook (which celebrates its twelfth birthday this week) disagrees: "We've crunched the Facebook friend graph and determined that the number is actually 3.57." At least among the 1.59 billion people on Facebook.

Let's break it down. First, of course the number of connections could be fewer, if the overall sample is smaller — 1.59 billion isn't the world's 7.4 billion! (The Facebook post says, however, that apparently interconnectivity has grown as the user base has increased.) But still, groups that have more in common will obviously be more connected. In this case, people with enough internet access, free time and the sheer interest of owning a Facebook account.

Personally, I would have been super interested if Facebook was using its mathematicians and social networking wizards to try and debunk the six degrees theory (which is already kinda sketchy and flawed) on a wider scale, going beyond the boundaries of Facebook and proving that we all are actually more connected than we think. And hey, maybe the happy rainbow unity magic of the internet might actually have something to do with it.

Instead, this is Facebook's latest attempt to make us think the site is a basic part of the human experience.

[Facebook Research]

Image via Facebook


Comments

    may as well be considered one in the same

    "One in the same"? I thought the phrase was "one and the same".

      One and the same is the correct phrase but I've heard both before, I've actually heard one in the same more than the alternative.

        Thank you.

        "One in the same" doesn't really make sense to me. "One and the same" does make sense, so not sure why "one in the same" is now more common.

          My bet is it's "simpler" to say "One an' the same" and then with accents and Chinese Whispers we ended up with "One in the same"

    'six degrees of separation' as a quote was around before social media sites.

    it doesnt surprise me its less.

    the 3.57 average sounds like Adelaide though.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now