Why Does NASA’s Chief Climate Scientist Keep Getting Arrested?

Jim Hansen has been head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies for 31 years. In this time, he’s been arrested twice. Why? How?

Because, as he tells Scientific American today, he believes the White House is ignoring its own agency’s alarming data on the state of the Earth’s environment.

Both arrests happened during protests against mountain-top removal coal mining. Above you can watch his speech at the Appalachia Rising in September 2010, where he delivered this bon mot: “We are in danger of becoming the land of the rich and the home of the bribe.” After the talk, he was arrested along with 100 others for failing to obey an order to disperse.

Hansen testified before congress twice in the ’80s about the implications of global warming. After that, he tells Scientific American, he stayed away from activism so he could concentrate on doing science. By 2004, he had produced so much science that made it clear the environment was in grave danger, and the government was doing so little about it, that he dove back into speaking out.

On one hand it’s heartening to see that despite Hansen’s outspoken shenanigans, he’s kept his government job for more than three decades (although: was his break in the ’90s and aughts really just because of science?). On the other hand, it’s distressing that still, neither party will take a strong stand on climate change. And we’re running out of time:

We really should be aiming to keep CO2 no higher than about 350 parts per million and possibly somewhat less than that if we want to maintain stable ice sheets and stable shore lines and avoid many other issues. That would require starting today. We’d have to reduce CO2 emissions at six per cent a year if we began next year. If we began five years ago, it would’ve been three per cent. If we wait until 2020, it becomes 15 per cent. So if we’re hoping to maintain a planet that looks like the one that humanity has known, we’re out of time right now.

[Scientific American]

Discuss

(13 Comments)
  • [–]

    eckythump

    Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM

    It’s not just the US, it’s not just the Government’s of the world, it’s a lack of education in every country of everyone! We get bugger all incentive to do better and we get told bugger all about the consequences of our actions. Until the entire planet truly understands the problem, nothing will happen. What we need is a charismatic man or woman to make a stand and get enough of a following that it effects everyone everywhere!

    • [–]

      RooBoy

      Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 3:32 PM

      the problem is that one persons charisma is another persons repulsion

      there isnt one blanket solution to any problem, and people expecting governments to provide one will be waiting for EVER

      • [–]

        Eccentricsoul

        Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 3:49 PM

        Ok, then don’t worry about it, clearly I’m on the wrong track. Better pass your message on to Martin Luther King, Oh wait he died for the cause! Look don’t concentrate on the bloody word look at the comment as a whole! ;)

  • [–]

    AAron

    Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 3:47 PM

    Arrested twice in 31years hardly warrants the headline “keeps getting arrested”. How about “Why has NASA’s chief climate scientist been arrested twice?”

    I then have to ask why is the headline a question when the author clearly knows the answer?

    • [–]

      Ozoneocean

      Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 4:42 PM

      Welcome to the concept of rhetorical questions. :)

    • [–]

      Matt L

      Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 10:31 PM

      You’ve mistaken this website for Quizmodo.

  • [–]

    alex effing

    Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 4:47 PM

    While he was protesting that our planet was going to die, he could have been building me a rocket ship and we could all come in uranus.

  • [–]

    Christian

    Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 5:07 PM

    You are assuming are running out of time….
    very unbiased reporting there

    • [–]

      greg

      Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 7:35 PM

      Given the current state of climate science, it’s not actually much of an assumption unfortunately. It’s easy to get misinformed on this subject, so be careful you’re not getting poor information, take a look at what reputable sources like the CSIRO, NASA, NOA, (or any other reputable scientific organisation for that matter) have to say on the subject.
      When a matter is this settled, its would more biased to depict it as unsettled.

      • [–]

        greg

        Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 7:40 PM

        Sorry, I meant NOAA.

      • [–]

        Christian

        Thursday, January 26, 2012 at 11:55 AM

        Seriously? Settled?
        Science, especially climate science is never settled!

        That is being misinformed if you believe this is settled

        • [–]

          Charles

          Thursday, January 26, 2012 at 12:43 PM

          Hmmm, I would rather take heed of proper scientific bodies such as CSIRO and NASA, rather than something called like ‘The Australian Climate Change Investigation Body*’.

          *An affiliate of BHP

          Or something like that.

        • [–]

          greg

          Thursday, January 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM

          It’s unsettled in the mind of the general public, but it’s very much settled among actual climate scientists.
          I promise I’m not misinformed, I read a LOT about this subject.
          It’s easy to get sucked in by myths about climate change, a good website that thoroughly addresses the misinformation is http://www.skepticalscience.com

Join The Discussion