For The First Time In Years, Your Next PC Will Be Amazing

By now you’re maybe sick of hearing about ultrabooks, the best chance Windows rigs have to catch up to Apple laptops in design, usability, build quality, and general good-and-wantable-product-ness. Don’t be. This isn’t the inevitable, dreary sameness that’s made PCs so boring for the last decade. In fact, it’s the opposite.

If what we’ve seen so far this year is any indication, the notebooks of the near-future look good and thoughtful and true. The design elements are inspiring. The features are useful. And most importantly: They don’t just imitate, they improve. Which means it’s finally time to get excited about PCs again.

The roll call of eye-catching ultrabooks, ones we’d actually buy tomorrow, is much longer than we had expected: the Dell XPS 13, the Lenovo Yoga, Samsung’s updated Series 9, the HP Spectre, and maybe Vizio’s little monster. But just rolling through the best machines sort of misses what’s up with ultrabooks generally. It’s not just that they’re getting better; it’s that they’re at the point where their design, quality, performance and innovation in these things, as a whole, are on par with Apple. That hasn’t been the case in a long time.

Case in point: Lenovo’s swiveling Yoga tablet/laptop hybrid. The U300s was a really, really nice machine, and Lenovo could have absolutely run out a guts refresh, improved this spec or that, and rested on the promise of Windows 8 driving sales. The Yoga is the exact opposite approach. Yeah, it’s way gimmicky, but the sort of gimmicky that’s based on actual needs and usefulness, given Metro’s touch-friendly implementation. Stuff like that, or the wake-for-email function on Dell’s XPS 13, is the kind of differentiation from Apple that Windows users have been starved for.

And these aren’t even the best laptops we’ll see this year, not by a long shot. Intel’s Ivy Bridge platform (you know, the one that will boost integrated graphic performance and improve battery life) will be inside most of these bad boys by this summer. That’s when the real fun starts.

The other major strategic change, at least for now, is that most companies aren’t spamming us with a ton of models. They’re mostly just giving you one or two screen sizes, and adding customisation options. Ultrabooks have given laptop makers an excuse to focus on one machine at a time, instead of having to spread attention around on 20 different models that no one ever asked for. Which is, like, really great.

Across the class, build quality is to the point that the old putdown “MacBook Air clone” — Samsung’s Series 9 wasn’t one last year, but totally is this time around — is maybe a little more complimentary than you’d think. Because, umm, some of them might have actually leapfrogged Apple’s offering. The new Series 9, for instance, feels almost exactly like the MacBook Air in materials and solidness, but it’s got a matte screen and comes in black (!). The XPS keeps your reproductives intact with its heat-deflecting carbon fibre arse. And the ALL GLASS HP Spectre might not be your design nirvana, but masses of the Beats-loving public will be delighted with it. It’s one thing to copy a MacBook and poop out a junkish half-measure; it’s another to borrow almost everything good and add even more desirable features to it.

Yeah, there were some clunkers, like LG’s guys-this-really-needs-to-be-better Z330, but they were mostly from first timers learning the lessons that everyone else seems to be getting right this generation. The companies that figured things out last year are making genuinely terrific-looking machines. And for the first time in a long time, Windows laptops are more exciting than Macs.

Discuss

(27 Comments)
  • [–]

    Timmahh

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 10:21 AM

    Look, you can play this silly game of one type of PC to the other all you want! The simple fact is, Windows 8 is going to be the game changer, it will run lightning fast on just about anything. I have the Dev on my little net book and it runs like a clock on crack, it is simply faster than I ever would of expected and if you use Metro with a touch pad you can say goodbye to the mouse forever. My netbook used to take over a minute to boot up and then it had to find the network. Now it’s awake and frisky in fifteen seconds flat! Windows 8 FTW!!

    • [–]

      MotorMouth

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 11:52 AM

      My experience is exactly the same. My Win7 netbook when from the usual clunky, slow, wait a minute for everything experience that most of them are to being a really usable laptop. The change was profound and I can’t wait for the beta build to land, because it is going straight onto my Zenbook. I really want to get one of those Tobii eye-tracking things, too. Hopefully Tobii will license the technology so it can be built into next-gen machines.

      • [–]

        Timmahh

        Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 1:08 PM

        Heh, I wonder if I’ll be able to port it onto my TF101 Transformer. Probably not, but I really would like to give it a go!! :)

    • [–]

      Adam

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 12:15 PM

      Thanks for the tip, will install the next Win 8 build to my netbook :)

    • [–]

      warcroft

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 12:54 PM

      +1

    • [–]

      Christian

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 12:57 PM

      Put an SSD in it…5 secs!

  • [–]

    Tony

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 10:51 AM

    This comment has been deemed inappropriate and has been deleted

  • [–]

    Lee

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 10:56 AM

    Not shure I follow you there. How is an Air better than my current dual booting Samsung 9?

  • [–]

    Dan

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM

    I lately feel like I’m the only person left who does not buy their computer for its appearance, sure its nice to have a good looking machine but when I go out to buy a computer I focus on specs and brand not how shiny and thin my new computer is.

    • [–]

      Jack

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 1:15 PM

      I’m pretty sure everyone on this website is specs>looks.
      The only people who go looks first are the main percentage of
      Apple buyers. And some portable devices with windows.

      • [–]

        Vebi

        Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 2:20 PM

        Not necessarily; I’ve seen many a Sony user pick design over functionality.

      • [–]

        Leo

        Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 1:11 PM

        the main percentage of apple buyers? Have you seen the mac os x operating system and how advanced it is, way ahead of windows, and notice how nearly every ultabook released this year was a shameless ripoff of the macbook air design, the macbook air has a way better operating system and specs than any of the competition. apple is the leading company nowadays, and just wait till the apple televison comes out the whole industry will be crapping itself,

      • [–]

        Chris

        Monday, January 16, 2012 at 9:18 AM

        Shiny, not so much, But thin, Shit yes!! The thinner (and therefore the lighter) a portable is the better. If its a portable computer, it should be as portable as possible. I want to be able to throw it in my bag and forget that I have it until it is needed.

    • [–]

      MotorMouth

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 3:17 PM

      Sure, but there are always a dozen PCs with matching specs, so why wouldn’t you choose the one that looks better or has the most convenient form factor for your needs, especially if it also offers rock-solid construction and materials?

      • [–]

        andy

        Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 5:50 PM

        because it costs an extra $500

        • [–]

          MotorMouth

          Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 2:56 PM

          Only if its a Mac.

  • [–]

    MotorMouth

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 11:48 AM

    This was interesting up to the point that it was suggested that PC laptops were up to Apple’s standard “for the first time”. I’ve been using laptops since 2003 and they have always been at least up to the standard of a MacBook. Of course, they were not the cheap and nasty consumer laptops, they were serious mobile workstations with performance an Apple user could only dream of. Who, for example, would have done this to their MacBook and expected it to keep working? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jKLa6KTheU

    Apple make, at best, mid-range computers – no high-end graphics or storage options – and for similar money it has always been possible to get a better PC laptop. My 4 year old Dell M4400 would eat any current MacBook alive in any test you’d care to put it through (except battery life, of course).

    Yes, MacBooks look OK but their design has hardly changed in a decade and isn’t nearly as fresh as it once was. I’d also suggest that Apple’s design has far more appeal to women than to men. e.g. I could never imagine myself with the original iMac, original MacBook, G3, iPod Touch for early iPhone. The Samsung Series 9 and Asus Zenbook both look much nicer than an Air, with at least the same solid feel and phenomenal performance. You might say the Asus is a clone of the Air but put them side-by-side (which Ive done in two Apple stores, just to annoy the “geniuses”) and the Air looks like your wife’s computer while the more angular, machined-look Zenbook looks like a man’s machine.

    As for the last sentence, I’ve never been excited in any way by any Apple product, especially those I have had to actually use to earn a living (although they are great when you are on a hourly rate). They have never done anything particularly well, they are just jacks of all trades for people who don’t really need to rely on their computer. In fact, now that I think about it, every time I have had to teach students or demonstrate software on a Mac, I have had to make excuses for things that just didn’t work as they should. I’ve NEVER had to do that with a PC, even though most of my PC demos were with laptops but I’ve only ever used desktop Macs. OK, you might suggest that the software wasn’t well ported to MacOS and I think you’d be right, up to a point, but it is also to do with the decisions Apple make about how their various device drivers will work. Either way, it is out of my hands and makes using them a lot less productive than I am used to.

    Sorry for the rant, it’s just that this belief that Apple set any kind of standards in the computer industry is rubbish. Their strengths are in marketing and spin, not engineering or performance. I fell for this perception right up until the time I had to actually use a Mac and it really annoys me that sheeple continue to swallow Apple’s Kool-Aid.

    • [–]

      Chris

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 12:40 PM

      This comment has been deemed inappropriate and has been deleted

    • [–]

      Vebi

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 2:27 PM

      Drop tests, etc are overrated. I used to have a Lenovo T10 or whatever (long gone now), and it darn near indestructible, except that it lost a ctrl key in the end due to much slamming after it stopped detecting the left ctrl. Anyway, to the point; I’d dropped it once on a brick-paved ground in its bag, had it dropped on carpet (while open) and had a relative spill tea on an identical laptop (not mine), and the laptops still worked.

      They were just terrible laptops, that’s all.

  • [–]

    Esophagus

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 1:48 PM

    PCs were always go to for me, I’m not spending ~$1300 for a Facebook machine. Macs just aren’t ripe for gaming and aren’t suitable for the tinkering I like to do.

  • [–]

    spk

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 5:15 PM

    You buy a mac for the operating system. Anyone who does serious multimedia, (mainly music/audio recording, production and performance) buys a mac. It’s stable, and that’s why I bought one.

    • [–]

      andy

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 5:59 PM

      UM.. totally not true. I work in a media production house and the mac pros crash almost every day for one reason or another. The only program u cant get on PC thats worth anything is final cut. But hey avid is considered better anyway and that works fine on PC. The whole attitude that macs are more stable than PC comes around from comparing a $600 netbook to a $1200 macbook pro etc. Not a fair comparison.

    • [–]

      Steve

      Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 11:44 PM

      This canard that Macs are more ‘stable’ is utter BS. Yes, Windows had MANY issues with stability and security up until the late 2000s, but just about any modern PC running Windows 7, this is almost never a concern unless you go out of your way to install shady software on it.

      As someone weaned mostly in Windows and got his first taste of Mac in 1999, I’ll be the first to admit that for the longest time, using Windows was a chore because MS put specs over the human experience. Back then, I’d have gladly gone full Mac, but stuck with Windows due to compatibility. But these days, Windows 7 really is no less usable or pleasant than Mac OSX and both offer compelling experiences.

      It’s extremely conceited for this blogger to make baseless accusations that of all the billions of people who’ve ever used PCs, not ONE has had an ‘amazing’ experience. Speak for yourself.

    • [–]

      MotorMouth

      Sunday, January 15, 2012 at 3:32 PM

      SPK (I assume this is not Graeme Revell?). This is another myth. Yes, a lot of creative people use Mac but most of them have never owned a PC in their lives and wouldn’t know how to use one. i.e. It is not an informed choice. They use Macs at college, because Apple are very good at getting their machines into educational institutions. Because they really don’t know any better, they just keep buying them.

      I do both things – I work for Channel 7 as a graphic artist and I get up on stage with my laptop and perform in front of people. We’ve also released 3 albums this decade and are working on a 4th. There is just no way I could do either job anywhere near as well on a Mac as I can on my PC. Firstly, Apple don’t write their graphics drivers for good performance, they write them for good multi-monitor support. As a consequence, high-end animation and compositing applications just don’t perform as well on Mac as on WIndoze or Linux.

      With music, it is more about choice. All the software we rely on when we are on stage or in the studio (I say studio but it is really my home) is only available for PC. More importantly, of all the bands we’ve ever performed with, no-one relies on their computer to the extent we do on stage. They all use Macs but are terrified of something going wrong. KMFDM and Combichrist, for example, run pre-recorded audio through ProTools and VNV Nation use a DVD backing tape and just play the occasional virtual synth live. OTOH, every sound we make is being created live – it either comes out of my PC or is sent through it for processing. My voice is processed on the PC, my controller keyboards (piano keyboards, not computer keyboards) both trigger virtual synths and my bandmate’s drum pads trigger sounds on my poor, little PC laptop. Nothing is pre-recorded, it is all being generated live, in realtime, on a PC and we have never had so much as the tiniest glitch on stage. Conversely, the guy from VNV Nation was silly enough to upgrade his OS X in the middle of their Australian tour a few years ago. Consequently he was unable to use his laptop on stage for half the tour, because it completely screwed all his software. Turns out he was smart to have most of it on a DVD.

      I also have more stability issues with my 1 year old MacPro at work than I have had with any PC in a decade or more. Of course, that means it has crashed once in a year but I think it is more like 7 or 8 years since my PC crashed on me. Anything based on WinNT – Win2000, XP, Vista, Win7 – is absolutely bulletproof. Don’t get me wrong, I use OS X at work every day and I’m fine with it, it just doesn’t have any of the advantages people associate with the brand and I can’t imagine any sort of compelling case in favour of Mac over PC.

  • [–]

    Sasha

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 7:52 PM

    With Linux running a properly set up Compiz, I consider my current PC pretty damned amazing, frankly. Compiz always blows me away.

    Oh, except my computer is made in 2003 and only 2GB of RAM and a single core, but its efficient enough I can keep 8+ memory intensive applications running with no hang or delay…

  • [–]

    SamSam

    Saturday, January 14, 2012 at 10:17 PM

    … love how it’s PC vs… ghost town here. Most reasonable people have moved on from the PC vs Mac debate – it’s stupid and there’s no winners. You guys need to grow up and be happy with the tech choices you make rather than flaming comment threads… ruining my happy giz reading time.

  • [–]

    lolwut

    Tuesday, January 17, 2012 at 11:30 AM

    My guess is slates with detachable keyboards will reign supreme. Why do i want a x86 klunker when i can have a ARM (or even mips) 1920×1200 tablet/top with a full linux distro?

Join The Discussion