What Pepper Spray Does To Your Body

When Lieutenant John Pike casually hosed down a line of seated protesters with pepper spray, a lot of weird stuff immediately followed. No, we’re not talking about the evolution of the meme. Or even the nationwide backlash.

We’re talking about what happened to the protesters’ bodies immediately after they got hit. Pepper spray takes your nervous system out back and beats the holy hell out of it.

The main pain-causing ingredient in most pepper sprays is an oil that comes from the same plant as cayenne pepper. (Don’t rub that shit in your eyes either.) But there are actually five major heat-producing elements in the spray that makes up a body-rocking cocktail spraymakers add to a solution containing a propellant. They call it the capsaicinoid concentration. Manufacturers dilute a small percentage of the stuff — usually between 0.18 per cent to 1.33 per cent for human targets. When sealed up in aluminium and nozzled, police have a neurotoxin in a can.

And then it happens: You’re minding your own business, sitting in the middle of a road with some friends, and then a cop walks in front of you and turns the world into a source of pain. You gasp as the spray hits your airwaves, causing instant inflammation of the mucous membranes in your throat and nose. The lining of your throat swells — not enough to stop you from breathing, but just enough to make it tough to get your fill of air. Coughing, gagging and shortness of breath are all to be expected. The stuff also temporarily paralyses your larynx, making it difficult to speak. Then your mean arterial blood pressure shoots up; blood floods your face, making it appear as if it has been burned. Normal breathing — the calm in-and-out that you don’t usually think about — may not return for another 45 minutes.

It doesn’t matter if you’re wearing glasses or contacts. When the doped propellant hits your eyes, the capsaicinoids stimulate your primary sensory nerve endings, which compel the nerve terminals to cough up their neuropeptides. Neuropeptides are the molecules neurons use to talk to each other, and when the spray forces them out, they cause inflammation.

The pepper can also damage the epithelial cells of the cornea, causing clusters of surface cells to detach. At the same time your eye capillaries dilate, which makes you reflexively jam your eyes shut. Sound bad? Don’t worry, you’ll have a chance cry about it. Next, of course, come the tears — or rather, the capsicum-induced hypersecretion of water.

Rubbing your face will only make it worse. Splashing lots of cold water will help in that way drinking water helps when you’ve accidentally chomped a bhut jolokia — it kinda works, but not immediately. Protesters say milk is the best way to fight the sting.

When you think it’s finally over, when the intense stinging has stopped: a parting gift. You’ll be sensitive to light for about a week.

Sounds bad? It used to be worse. When the fiery concoction was first used in the US in the late 1970s, the percentage of pepper to spray was more severe — as were the effects when you were hit with it. Early versions could force the detachment of the entire corneal epithelium, causing a condition that required medial care for weeks.

We can only hope the UC Davis students make a speedier recovery.

Rachel Swaby is a freelance writer living in San Francisco. Check her out on Twitter.

Giz Explains is where we break down whatever science or tech questions are scratching at the backs of our noggins.

Photo: Spencer Platt

Discuss

(22 Comments)
  • [–]

    Matt

    Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 9:59 AM

    “We can only hope the UC Davis students make a speedier recovery.”
    I have no problems with protestors if its done peacefully and legally but when you are breaking the law and asked to move on and you don’t, don’t expect sympathy when the police move in and use reasonable force. Pepper spray is a lot better than battons, rubber bullets and in some countries, live rounds!

    • [–]

      InformedGamer

      Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 10:14 AM

      Completely agree. So sick of hearing people saying the police are just thugs. Would you rather they use the beanbag shotgun and risk permanent injury?

    • [–]

      Entilzha

      Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 10:15 AM

      http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am1
      Ah yes American’s never let a pesky thing like their consitution get in the way of a good old spraying.

    • [–]

      Marlon

      Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 10:17 AM

      I agree to an extent Matt, but it’s also worth asking.. isnt the point of a protest to defy authority and make a point? Sometimes laws need to be broken or protested against when they no longer make sense.. When the same authority that you’re often protesting against (usually government in some form or the other) tells you, ‘okay, you’ve had your fun.. now piss off, we want the street/park back’.. is it any surprise that people don’t leave? This is only made worse when they use means like this to disperse crowds.

      Take the Occupy Melbourne protesters for example, they were foolish to set up in the middle of a busy city square, but surely negotiating with them to move to a more suitable location (Treasury Gardens where they ended up) would have worked much better than Robert Doyle’s ‘you have till 9:00am to frak off’ ultimatum followed by bringing down the wrath of oblivion on them..

    • [–]

      Jp

      Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 11:11 AM

      So, Matt, the next time that you are peacefully protesting, and a policeman walks up to you and sprays raw naked pain all over you, you’ll not complain yeah?

      What happened at UC Davis was an act of extreme police brutality, and goes far beyond reasonable force.

    • [–]

      Matt

      Thursday, November 24, 2011 at 9:15 AM

      Is that not the reason we interfere in Afghanistan/Libya/Syria? To bring democracy to the people against those pesky dictators who are harming their citizens?
      You know, citizens who are trying to protest but are breaking one of THEIR LAWS so their Government/Police force uses ‘reasonable’ force?

  • [–]

    awallafashagba

    Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 10:15 AM

    WOW ….. I think i had a can of pepper spray way back in the 80′s when you could buy it as a rape deterrent – we messed about with it and felt pain … had no idea the stuff could detach the cornea !! wowsers

  • [–]

    InformedGamer

    Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 10:18 AM

    Nice article about alternatives :D

    http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/11/less-lethal-weapons-pepper-spray-uc-davis

  • [–]

    lolwut

    Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 11:03 AM

    come on, this occupy shenanigans is going too long already

    yes yes we know you are the 99%, yes yes we know the 1% is the super rich

    and what people going to do about it? whinge and let yourself get arrested?

    go out and work like the rest of us, in a way, thanks to the 1%, we actually have jobs to feed our family, we may not be able to go vacationing to the moon, but if I can provide for my family without struggling working 60 hours a week, I’m happy enough

    and yes, those occupy melbourne IS breaking the common law, you think the cops have the patiance dealing with childish grown people who did not want to obey common sense?

    • [–]

      Shane

      Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 11:20 AM

      “thanks to the 1%, we actually have jobs to feed our family”

      Jesus! I don’t know where to even start on that comment. What possible basis do you have for any of that?

      • [–]

        vin

        Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 11:45 AM

        Dude, i really think you miss the point…

        it’s not that the 1% are richer that the 99%… it’s that they use that power to influence economies which benefit them and adversely effect the 99%…

        eg – banks flaunt their cash into investments and overly committing their funds to loans. Then when a recession hits, governments are forced to buy them out of trouble with tax payers money… (ie – the 99% buy them out, so that the banks can feel free to do what they want again, whilst rates go up to pay for it)
        the point is that the 1% are sky-high and untouchable, and the 99% are the worker-bees…

      • [–]

        Flux

        Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 2:14 PM

        @Shane: Sadly, people still believe in trickle-down economics even though it has been roundly debunked in economic circles. Oh, but those economics professors, they’re just liberal elitists, right?

  • [–]

    Slight

    Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 11:20 AM

    you know, the 1% dont actually create any of those jobs, the main job creators are small and start up businesses.

    When they get successful often they get bought up by the 1%.

    As it is social inequity hurts the entire economy as you have less money going to people who actually will buy stuff (eg food or tv’s ) and more going to derivative and future trading (stuff which can cause gfc like events).

    Which in turn means less jobs, Happy?

  • [–]

    Michael

    Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 11:28 AM

    The police couldn’t give a rat’s whether they are protesting “Corporate greed’ or unfair treatment of homeless black gays in wheelchairs or whatever. They get called out to move on a bunch of protestors breaking the law (after all that’s their business model) and thats what they are going to do.
    Lieutenant Pike could have asked them another ten thousand times to move, they weren’t going to, there’d be the usual struggle to move them, getting spat on, abused and kicked, they’d spray them and then the usual accusations of police brutality. Lieutenant Pike just decided to cut to the chase and skip the redundant stages. They got asked to move, they didn’t, tough luck.

    • [–]

      Flux

      Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 12:04 PM

      Cool, so police are allowed to pre-profile offenders now in your book? I bet that would NEVER get abused… “He was a hippie, I presume he woulda spat on me if I gave him a chance so I didn’t” morphs really easily into “He was a black dude, I presume he woulda shot me if I gave him a chance so I shot him first”… Is that really how civil society should work?

      • [–]

        Michael

        Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 1:20 PM

        We can all spout silly analogies till the cows come home. I’m a pragmatist. Do you seriously think it if he asked them again nicely they were going to move? Give us a break.

        • [–]

          Flux

          Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 2:04 PM

          No, I don’t think they would have moved – but then, I hardly think sitting in a circle on private property should be an offence that folks get arrested for. We all applaud the protesters in the Middle East for standing up to corrupt systems and demanding democracy and free speech, but when you limit the right to protest and justify police brutality against Western dissidents you willingly give those ideals away.

          Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither. Let’s not be a police state where protesters are scared into silence or violence, let’s have an open discourse where dissenting views can be fairly heard across media platforms and in public spaces, where cops DO care what the protest is about. What are we afraid of?

          An end to the police ‘us and them’ siege mentality with the public (and a corresponding reduction in use of force) would improve society’s view of the force immeasurably. When an officer empowered by the State commits this sort of brutality, society at large sees him as just a thug with a badge.

          All of those “redundant steps” of asking again and again to leave, then escalating to arrest one person, etc. are there to make police STOP AND THINK before casually hosing down civilians with harmful chemical agents. That’s the point. They weren’t people to the officer in question, they were weeds to be whacked. This man has no idea what “protect and serve” means, and he’s a fucking disgrace.

          • [–]

            Michael

            Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 3:39 PM

            God you just rabbit on. They were on private property. The person with lawful authority over that private property asked the police to remove them. They are obliged to do so. What they are protesting for or against is irrelevant to the police.
            I lived through the sixties and in theory we should all now pacifists living in a hippy utopia. What happened? Fact is 99.99% of idealists grow up to be realists. Officer Pike looked more like Pragmatist of the year than a thug with a badge.

            • [–]

              Flux

              Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 5:36 PM

              They were in a school. THEIR school. Surely they’re supposed to be welcome to express themselves in a place of learning? If they were destroying property, or attacking police, then by all means arrest them. But they ought to be able to protest peacefully in their own school. I believe the dean and the officer in question have been suspended for overstepping their authority here.

              And what happened? The eighties neocons happened, and have been driving the Western political agenda for much of the 30 years since. Reaganomics happened. Corporatism and monopolistic conglomeration happened. Realpolitik happened. Proxy wars, and then wars based on made-up WMDs happened. Hedging happened, and then bailouts for the rich hedgers but not the poor homeowners happened. That’s a hell of a job your generation did for us young folks, Michael. And we have the cheek to protest!?!

  • [–]

    Abe

    Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 2:35 PM

    People need to start watching documentaries, like Michael Moore firms even the recent release of “Thrive, what on earth will it take”.

    There’s PLENTY on the web.

    Please do your research if you want to flame the protesters and back the 1%.

  • [–]

    fff

    Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 2:48 PM

    for those of us that have commented and back the police behavior and diminish the protestors…. i would like to say that you are all living in your own world with fantasies and fairys. if you really understood what the protests are about, there would be no way in hell you would support this ‘police-state’ behavior. You don’t think this will happen in Australia? Think again.

  • [–]

    madskins

    Thursday, November 24, 2011 at 11:49 PM

    thank you fff finally an informed opinion. The occupy haters can all tune to FOX NEWS and watch them explain that the spray is a vegetable product, what’s next? Ricin? (made from castor beans)… Get informed first, then comment…

Join The Discussion