
I’m a big fan of breathing. You’re probably the same. But would you pay a buck for a minute’s worth of “flavoured” oxygen? Sydney’s newest bar is built on that premise.
Oxygen bars aren’t a new phenomenon per se (the above photo’s from a London oxygen bar), but Sydney Morning Herald reporter Amanda Hoh took one for the team yesterday testing out the O2 Bar at Sydney’s Darling Harbour Harbourside shopping centre. The bar sells a hit of flavoured 90 per cent oxygen — a much higher concentration than in regular air — for $1. Call me picky, but when I’m out and about shopping, I’m generally not thinking about getting intubated in the manner of an emergency room patient. Am I missing something? [SMH]
Image: GiollaUidir


















Stephen
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:08 AMWhat happened to “as free as the air you breathe”?
This is an enormous waste of money. They initially tried selling high oxygen concentrations as providing health benefits, but got into trouble with authorities. They still rely on word of mouth to promote how “wonderful” this is.
Although… it is in central Sydney.
JD
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 12:40 AMnot really, $1 isn’t really so expensive. if this is a waste of money then alcohol must be like throwing away your wallet.
grant
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 8:23 AMat least you get a proven effect from drinking alcohol. Paying to breath? not really anything different from doing it for free…
Matt
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:16 AMHope the guy before you didn’t have a runny nose
Le_Gambit
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:20 AMIt makes me remember this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQhNNwZhhlg
Sam
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 4:40 PMHa, that’s great! I thought of this straight away.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiabeNR_q0U
Steve
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 10:47 PMReminds me of that Simpsons episode where Moe changes his tavern into a pretentious upscale bar for yuppies and he has an oxygen bar installed.
I hardly think the level they’re giving people is damaging, but it sure is going to fleece a lot of stupid people.
panderiz
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:20 AMwtf for, just give me your money if you don’t want it, yuppy twits
Joel
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:23 AMPointless. No health benefits, just smelly air. Woo.
Trjn
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:30 AMThere used to be one of these on the Gold Coast near Cavill Ave.
I remember this because I went out with some friends and spent several minutes mocking it after we walked past.
It seems no less ridiculous now.
Matthew K
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:33 AMOxygen bars are garbage anyways, as there’s only so much oxygen you can absorb. Now they’re trying to sell us falvoured air? you know what? If you’re in the harbour area, try enjoying the sea air! Sure, it’s hit or miss whether the harbour smells like the ocean or a sweaty arse on any given day, but come on.
William
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:39 AMIts not mandatory. so get over it?
Christian
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 7:41 PMWell we are asked for opinions, so we won’t get over it thank you very much…
JonBOY
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:45 AMThis is actually EXTREMELY bad for your health!
Biological systems, such as the human body, exist in states of equilibrium, and this is true for reduction-oxidation pathways.
That is, although we breath oxygen, it’s consumption during metabolism is associated with an underly rate of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which are produced when the enzymatic pathways extracting energy from the oxygen go wrong. These ROS react with and damage important cellular components such as DNA. To combat these ROS, the cells within out body contain anti-oxidants, and the and the amount of anti-oxidants present exists in equilibrium with the amount of ROS that are present.
When you switch from breathing air, which is approximately 20% oxygen, to breathing 100% oxygen, you throw out the equilibrium as higher oxygen content in the blood raises the amount of ROS in our circulation. Because the amount of ROS rises so suddenly, the bodies anti-oxidant defences lags behind, creating a situation where highly reactive free radical species, such as super oxide, are free to attack and damage your cells.
As a real world example, studies have shown that rates of leukaemia are higher in children that received 100% oxygen immediately following birth, compared to babies that received air. The 100% oxygen floods the babies system, which in turn raises the amount of ROS produced. The ROS then overwhelms the new borns anti-oxidant defences and the unbalanced ROS is free to attack and damage DNA. At a fundamental level, cancer occurs following two key events: firstly, the cell loses its ability to regulate its cell cycle due to a destructive mutation in one of the genes involved, such as P53. Secondly, the cell loses its ability to undergo a programmed cell death, which would normally occurs when the cell loses its ability to regulate its cell cycle. Exposure to the 100% oxygen as new borns does not immediately induce cancer, however it puts the newborn in a situation where ROS are free to induce one of these destructive changes. Having sustained one of the mutations immediately following birth, the new born is then at a greater risk of developing cancer for the remainder of its life, which manifests as increased rates of leukaemia among the children.
Too much of a good thing can indeed kill you.
PS. If you’ve read this far you are probably thinking that administering 100% oxygen to new borns is obviously really bad, but the fact is that it’s actually standard practice for the care of a new born, so you yourself were probably sucking down 100% oxygen just moments after birth. hmmmmm
lulz
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:56 AM+1
Prozackmorris
Saturday, February 11, 2012 at 3:37 PMThe studies performed by Vanderbilt University Medical Canter are interesting and do add some new thought on free radicals. The point they are ignoring is that an oxygen bar session is for 10 or 15 minutes, 30 minutes at the most. The study performed at Vanderbilt were for 3 hours which they considered a short time, but is a much longer period of time than one spends on an oxygen bar. The purpose of an oxygen bar is to increase the oxygen level in ones blood to above 99% from possibly 96% or 94% If a person is as low as 86% they may be on oxygen full time. An oxygen bar can increase ones blood oxygen level to max in about 3 or 4 minutes. When one is 10 years old, they usually carry 100% of the oxygen ones blood can carry. As we age and are exposed to smog, smoke and other toxins, our lungs become less effective and a 10 minute boost of oxygen really does make one feel better and helps fight off many diseases.
EckyThump
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 12:27 PM+1
Husky
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 12:29 PMCalm down. The picture shows people using Nasal prongs, which are at most 2-3L per minute, which isn’t much more then 26%. Even 8-15L per minute via a face mask is only giving you 40% oxygen and during a cardiac arrest paramedics use a full rebreather circuit with 100% oxygen input which still only delivers 60% oxygen to the patient. So no, this isn’t bad for your health, just pointless.
Stuart
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 1:20 PMSpot on Husky
Stuart
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 1:19 PMJonBOY, great job on fanning the flames here, but you’ve missed the mark a bit. In fact, entirely. Husky is dead right with his numbers. And you are dead wrong about babies routinely being administered 100% oxygen at birth. I work in a tertiary hospital as an anaesthetist and oxygen, if used at all, is carefully titrated to the individual needs of the newborn. Rarely, if ever, is this 100%. And it absolutely NOT standard practice. We are aware of the potential damage of oxygen free radicals, but you have over stated it and added a level of rhetoric that is completely misplaced.
JonBOY
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 1:48 PMIf nasal tubes dilute oxygen then that may very well be fine, ultimately whether or not there is potential for oxidative damage is going to depend on the individual, the equilibrium that that exists within them and their ability to respond to changes in oxygen tension, however slight.
That said, I’ve attended countless caesarean sections where 100% oxygen is administered by a face mask that covers the mouth and nose entirely. We have research neonatologists that have explicitly raised this exact concern within our centre and yet are forced to follow protocol despite the potential negative impact. Believe what you will, but I see first hand whats going on within the hospital where I work and have been involved in the discussions pertaining to it.
Husky
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 2:40 PMDilute oxygen? Nasal Prongs? That statement makes me question your merits. The consumers mouth will be doing that for them. If the consumer has no mouth and has evolved to the point where they breathe only 2-3L per minute (Well below what a typical adult can survive on for those playing at home), then maybe levels will reach a harmful level. Everyone else (Read: Humans), should be just dandy.
Husky
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 2:44 PMAlso, Even without a mouth inhaling through your nose with Nasal prongs insitu will still supply adequete atmospheric air to dilute the low-flow oxygen.
JonBOY
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 3:03 PMyou don’t understand dilution? 100% oxygen exiting the tube and mixing with air present in the airway (given that they are using the nasal delivery method as noted) which contains 20% oxygen is going to have a dilution effect. It’s a pretty simple concept.
JonBOY
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 1:51 PM…next thing you tell me is that we should all go and have a nice glass of demonised Milli-Q water right? It’s so clean it must be good for you……
Ted
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 5:38 PMJonBOY also proudly sports a 911truth sticker on his bumper.
IanK
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:59 AMWell.. You’re only supposed to breathe pure oxygen when you get the bends, right?
Also, wouldn’t this place be a fire hazard? :3 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrox)
JD
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 12:38 AMyes, but no doubt there would be some form of specialist fire safety equipment on the premises. would love to hear more if anybody has any details
Lord Crumplebottom
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 12:04 PMThe only time this ever makes sense is for medical reasons – and then it’s monitored.
I hope they’re shut down for endangering public health.
Husky
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 12:32 PMRead my above response. This is in no way endangering public health.
Stephen
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 1:36 PMSorry, but I just have to interrupt the discussion to say you share your name with my first pomeranian.
Mike
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 12:25 PM(the above photo’s from a London oxygen bar)
Could’ve guessed by all the ugly mugs in the picture :p
Andreas
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 12:25 PMI wonder if you can smoke while doing this.
Lord Crumplebottom
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 12:26 PMOh, you’d smoke alright. Immediately after making that flame to light up.
EckyThump
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 12:54 PMI’m sorry,… you said what now?
JL
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 12:53 PM= bottled water
Stuart
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 1:21 PMhaha dead on. Pointless and harmless (to the individual at any rate, environment is another thing)
ozoneocean
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 1:15 PMReplace “suckers” with “wankers”
Elliot
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 2:00 PMthat’s a *little* bit harsh I think. probably most of these people are just curious to see what it’s like to have more oxygen in your lungs, and are willing to part with $1 to find out. you strike me as someone that thinks anyone who does anything that you don’t do is a wanker. I’d love to have so much confidence in myself. oh wait – that would make me a wanker.
ozoneocean
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 2:54 PMWhat do you mean “would”? :)
mar
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 4:10 PMWell, what exactly is the point of this? Yeah I think that’s all I have to say about this lol wtf
Sean Robert Meaney
Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 9:06 PMI see this as a precursor to legalized Helium and Laughing Gas abuse.
Magnetic motors
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 12:08 AMMay aswell call it a wanker bar.
Chris
Friday, September 2, 2011 at 3:15 PMEver had to go drinking again whilst still hungover like a bitch? This would help you get your drink on again alot faster :) well when I go to work hung over a minute or 2 on the oxy-viva does wonders!
Max
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 6:14 PMThe oxygen bar at harbor side was awesome it’s only 90% not 100 % and you have to take 100% for 4 hours before it’s toxic Jon BOY. You wanka don’t knock it till you’ve tried it the American lung association said there is no harm so who are you to say other wise WANKA
Maggie
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 6:25 PMIve been in the medical industry for years in the states extensive study’s have been done on these oxygen bars no harm has ever been proven from using these bars not a single case has been reported in the last 10 years all these study’s can be found on the net
Ann
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 6:37 PMI was at the 02 bar today feel great ready for my night I seriously think all you guys who are bad mouthing it should give it a go as for the guy said wanker bar the only wanker is you sitting at home looking t your computer , rather then getting out and trying new things your a joke
Steve
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 6:44 PMI have a question for all you critics. If a higher concentration of oxygen is so bad for you, why is it that when the ambulance picks up a patient the first thing they do is put on an oxygen mask. I’m guessing it helps them relax. Also if you have ever watched the NFL you would also notice the players on the side line with an oxygen mask. I guess they’re recovering and need a quick hit of an energy boost. If anyone actually researches the benefits of oxygen you will notice experts do say that a higher concentration of oxygen is not harmful and can have a lot of benefits. The American lung association have also put out a statement saying that oxygen bars are safe and are not harmful. It is true that a higher concentration of oxygen is toxic, but only at 100% at a period of 4 hours. How is an oxygen bar even close when it is 90% at max 20 minutes. At the end of the day, too much of any good thing is no good. The USA have been experiencing oxygen bars for 15 years including myself. I enjoyed the experience and I’m glad we now have one in our own city.
JD
Monday, September 5, 2011 at 12:35 AMhmm.. using the term “energy hit” isn’t entirely correct, probably closer to the point of increasing the efficiency of bodily tasks requiring O2, though the sensation certainly feels like an increase of energy. this all being said O2 bars could be viewed in the same way as bars which serve alcohol, too much of a good thing is not a good thing, so moderation is key!
Sam
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 6:46 PMO2 bar darling harbor rocks
Fuckstick
Sunday, September 4, 2011 at 6:58 PMTotes watev