Brought to you by

Intel Claims Next Chip Will Run Laptops For 24 Hours Each Charge

I can’t wait for 2013. That’s the year where Intel’s Haswell architecture arrives, bringing three very important things. One, the ability to run your laptop for 24 hours on one charge. Heaven. Two, 10 days on “connected standby”.

And three: This 22-nanometre 3D-transistor architecture consumes so little power — 20 times less than their current gear — that it can run on a solar cell. That’s exactly what they demonstrated at the Intel’s Developer Forum today: a Haswell-based Windows computer running entirely off a solar cell that was being exposed to a light bulb. Imagine that. Basically, your computer would be able to run indefinitely without ever having to power off, even if you run out of battery power to run the machine’s display. I’m impressed.

That’s why you can also have 10 days of connected standby with your computer connected to a wireless network. That means putting the display to sleep but have the machine continuously connected to the Internet for 10 days, grabbing email, tweets, or synchronising files down from the cloud. I don’t know about you, but this low power peace of mind is one of the things that I like most about these new chips.

Before 2013′s Haswell comes Ivy Bridge in 2012, which will also reduce power and support DirectX 11.1 and OpenGL 3.2 directly on the chip, as well as 4K high definition video playback. [Anandtech, Marketwatch, Forbes, Ventura Beat, Sweclockers]

Discuss

(6 Comments)
  • [–]

    EckyThump

    Wednesday, September 14, 2011 at 8:04 AM

    Jesus that was fast, it was only a few months ago that they announced 3D architecture,.. at least officially anyway! #]

  • [–]

    Tim

    Wednesday, September 14, 2011 at 8:46 AM

    That is friikin awesome, real world results will vary of course but power usage is the only thing I like about macs more than PCs.

  • [–]

    Troy

    Wednesday, September 14, 2011 at 8:58 AM

    24 hours of dull screen, wifi-less word processing. Yay!

  • [–]

    Steve

    Wednesday, September 14, 2011 at 12:22 PM

    Unless Intel’s also in the business of making energy-efficient screens + GPUs and so on, I hardly see how a more efficient processor can jack up battery life this drastically. 24 hours? Please.

  • [–]

    Faz

    Saturday, September 17, 2011 at 12:56 AM

    @Steve – Well, Intel make integrated graphics, and LED backlit screens use less power.

    HP for example have tech that can switch between ustilization of dedicated and integrated graphics. With the dedicated card turned off, and the intel chipset being used, I can definitely see how they will get there.

  • [–]

    Warren East

    Saturday, September 17, 2011 at 9:21 AM

    lol, I don’t think this is what the industry has been waiting for – mips/watt is essential but you need the whole embedded ecosystem behind you, and you need SOC.

    so yeah intel you just got served

Join The Discussion