Ancient Earth Got A Galactic Golden Shower

A large part of gold’s allure is its rarity. Even so, it’s still 1000 times more abundant on Earth than it should be. Boffins at University of Bristol now have an explanation for this phenomenon: it came from ouuuuter spaaaaaace!

In theory, most of the gold, and other heavier metals like tungsten, that were around during Earth’s inception would have been sucked into the core during its formation because of their relatively high mass and density; thus leaving behind a crust bereft of bling. While this makes sense logically, it clearly doesn’t mesh with reality. Humans have been mining gold for millennia despite not having access to the core.

After comparing tungsten concentrations from samplings of the world’s oldest rocks (formed about four billion years ago) with those of more modern rocks, scientists found that modern rocks contain significantly more tungsten than their ancient counterparts. Since gold, tungsten, and precious metals in general behave similarly when it comes to geological formation, this means that the original crust contained far fewer precious metals than modern ones. Through further research, they were able to link this change to an exact event: the “terminal bombardment”.

Far from being an Schwarzenneger movie, “terminal bombardment” refers to a gigantic meteor shower (or rather hurricane) that took place around 3.9 billion years ago. It consisted of 20 billion billion tons [not a typo]of meteorites crashing into the recently-formed Earth’s crust. Damn, nature… It’s these asteroids that endowed Earth with virtually all the metals that we’ve come to depend on for so many purposes. After all, where would civilisation be today without grillz? [University of Bristol, BBC]Image from NASA

Discuss

(17 Comments)
  • [–]

    Mojolicious

    Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 10:56 AM

    I guess this gives more credence to the plot of Cowboys and Aliens :-)

    But it’s interesting to consider how the lack of metals on other planets might affect their inhabitants ability to evolve to a technological point without the iron age and materials necessary for an industrial society and beyond.

    • [–]

      Osiris Fox

      Tuesday, September 13, 2011 at 3:06 PM

      Alternatively, it make the prospect of very aggressive and highly efficient aliens more plausible.

      - Constantly at war with each other just to control normal day to day resources.
      - Really would need to evolve and grow technologically very quickly to gain the means to access more resources (i.e. mine space).

  • [–]

    Joel

    Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 11:02 AM

    “After all, where would civilisation be today without grillz?”

    Somewhere much, much better I’d hope..

  • [–]

    Liam

    Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 1:22 PM

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=golden%20shower

  • [–]

    Matt

    Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 1:25 PM

    I loled..

    But on a more serious note, that is a hell of a lot of meteorites!

  • [–]

    Liam

    Sunday, September 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM

    To put that all into perspective, the weight of the Earth is:
    ~6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000kg (6×10^24kg)
    The total mass of the meteorites:
    20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000kg (2×10^22kg)

    That’s 1/300th of the entire mass of the planet! That just blows my mind…

    • [–]

      Ash

      Monday, September 12, 2011 at 10:11 AM

      Why is there always at least one person who has to do the calculations and then post it? Are you trying to prove you know how to use a calculator? Because you sure as hell didn’t figure that out with a paper and pen.

      • [–]

        BT

        Monday, September 12, 2011 at 10:32 AM

        I think Liam’s post was a good one, puts into perspective just how much battering our world took billions of years before we came into existance. (And for the record, that’s a pretty simple calculation for paper and pen.)

        • [–]

          SkinHead

          Monday, September 12, 2011 at 12:40 PM

          Agree. 1/300th did me in

        • [–]

          Osiris Fox

          Tuesday, September 13, 2011 at 2:58 PM

          Agreed!

  • [–]

    Andre

    Monday, September 12, 2011 at 8:47 AM

    ewwwwwwww….

  • [–]

    BenDTU

    Monday, September 12, 2011 at 9:00 AM

    Uchu KITAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

  • [–]

    vin

    Monday, September 12, 2011 at 9:07 AM

    i would’ve thought that matter that’s heavier, and more dense would be slower to get to the Earth’s core than the less dense material around it? :S

  • [–]

    Lillee

    Monday, September 12, 2011 at 11:41 AM

    So volcano’s don’t bring up any heavy metals?

    • [–]

      SkinHead

      Monday, September 12, 2011 at 12:41 PM

      Yes but in the Scheme of things not enough obvious by Liams calcs.

  • [–]

    Commander Shepard

    Monday, September 12, 2011 at 12:43 PM

    @X so they do proof read?

  • [–]

    Osiris Fox

    Tuesday, September 13, 2011 at 3:07 PM

    When your read stuff like this, it certainly makes one wonder if there might just be some sort of hidden hand out there shaping the universe at will.

Join The Discussion