
The defence Department Inspector General’s study states the screwup pretty plainly, Danger Room reports: “Ballistic Inserts Were Not Tested Consistently.” And what’s that mean? “The tests we reviewed were incomplete, executed with the wrong size ballistic insert, or performed in environmental test conditions outside of the range specified.” In other words, the Army has no idea how effective — if at all — five million pieces of body armour plating are. And that’s after it’s spent $US2.5 billion on the stuff. With that in mind, the title of the report — “Ballistic Testing for Interceptor Body armour Inserts Needs Improvement” — is a pretty serious understatement.

This revelation shouldn’t be entirely surprising — it dates back to 2004, after all. The Iraq war, despite all its length and arduousness, has been a poorly engineered conflict. From its very inception, infantrymen were sent out lacking armour on both their person and their vehicles. The Secretary of Defense’s defense? The infamous “You go to war with the army you have — not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time,” adding dubiously “You can have all the armour in the world on a tank, and a tank can be blown up.” Design was secondary.
We’ve been at war with that army for eight years now, and to know that a lesson as basic as making sure the bulletproof vests work hasn’t been learned is as disheartening as it is frightening. And I’m not even over there being shot at. [via Danger Room]
Photo: Chris Hondros/Getty
You can keep up with Sam Biddle, the author of this post, on Twitter, Facebook, or Google+.



















EckyThump
Saturday, August 6, 2011 at 3:48 PMSure, lets spend mega billions on jets that will be obsolete before they come on line, but screw spending money on the troops! The poor buggers are so short on supplies that they have to beg, borrow, barter buy and steel batteries to keep their equipment running!! #{
Paul
Saturday, August 6, 2011 at 11:24 PM*steal batteries.
Well this isn’t good. What happened to that whole dragon scale stuff, tests looked good to me. Obviously the army doesn’t want to fork out for it.
EckyThump
Sunday, August 7, 2011 at 9:00 AM“*steal batteries.”
Yeah well, when they build a spell checker that recognises context, I’ll come across like a reel, I mean real, boy!!
Cflow
Monday, August 8, 2011 at 6:20 AMThey have. Or at least your mum and dad did.
Try imagining a world where you re-read your own post before uploading it for everyone to enjoy. It’s worth your time.
EckyThump
Monday, August 8, 2011 at 7:40 AMI really hate trolls..#{
MotorMouth
Sunday, August 7, 2011 at 11:02 AMI can tell you now, the armour cannot take a bullet. That’s not what it’s for. It might stop small bits of shrapnel penetrating your flesh but if someone shoots you with a rifle, even an AK-47, a bullet is going to get through any body-armour. The stuff you see on cop shows on TV stops hand-gun rounds, which are relatively slow. Soldiers fight wars with rifles and machine guns which have an order of magnitude more kinetic energy.