Do Electronic Devices Really Need To Be Turned Off During Takeoff And Landing?

When you fly on an aeroplane, you get told to turn off and stow portable electronics, but is this really necessary? Sometimes I leave my phone on during take off on purpose by accident and nothing ever happens. Is this rule B.S. or is there really something to it? Sincerely, Flummoxed Flyer

Title photo remixed from originals by andersphoto and Stasys Eidiejus (Shutterstock)

Dear FF,

The quick answer is no, electronic devices do not pose a problem so long as everything is going smoothly on the flight. It’s when there are issues that your electronic devices can potentially make things worse. Regulation states that various electronic devices can cause interference with the plane and therefore need to be turned off for the safety of everybody onboard. But as you’ve probably noticed, your iPod and Kindle alone are not going to interfere with the plane’s navigation and communication systems. The potential problem is the combined interference of many devices. In some cases this is pretty much B.S. and in some cases it isn’t. Here’s why.

Your Electronics Can (Technically) Interfere With the Planes…

Electronic devices can cause Radio Frequency Interference (RFI), and this was a very real concern when aeroplanes relied on Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) navigation. NDB navigation uses AM signals which are pretty susceptible to RFI. That said, most modern aircrafts don’t use NDB navigation anymore in favour of VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR) navigation. To put this in perspective, AM radio signals fall in the medium frequency (MF) range and VHF stands for very high frequency. The lower the radio frequency range the more susceptible it tends to be to RFI. VHF, being by name a set of very high frequencies, doesn’t have that problem nearly as much. Basically, VHF doesn’t really care that your iPod is blasting music into your noise-cancelling headset, because those devices don’t cause much interference. A pile of laptops, on the other hand, could offer up a more significant amount of RFI. For the plane’s flight crew to go over each and every device that could possible pose a problem would basically be a waste of time, and that would also require extensive testing by authorities like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). It’s just easier to lump everything into one category and request that you turn it off.

http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2011/08/how-to-pin-a-program-to-the-taskbar-or-dock/…But That Risk Is Really Low…

But if some electronics do pose a risk, why aren’t more planes having issues? As seen in Myth Busters, aeroplanes are shielded to prevent this problem. Basically, it’s not much an issue at all. What’s even better for your in-flight portable electronics are Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) and GPS, which are both more accurate than VOR and operate on higher frequencies (meaning less RFI-related issues). When these systems are the norm your portable electronics will be basically irrelevant to the plane’s navigation, even though they pretty much are already.

So is there actually a problem? No, not really, but it all comes down to an emergency precautions. As take off and landing account for half of flying accidents (PDF), it’s important to have emergency communications available. Some of the aircraft emergency frequencies are in the lower range, which is a range more susceptible to interference. While the plane is shielded from interference, you have to ask yourself this: if your pilot needs to communicate on these lower frequencies in the event of an emergency, do you want to risk the chance of RFI?

…and You Should Just Deal With It

Ultimately this risk appears to be very low and you have very little to worry about, but as comedian Louis C.K. notes, you’re flying through the sky in a chair. That’s pretty awesome. In the near-ish future we’ll have better technology in most aircrafts and we’ll tell our grandchildren about the arduous ten minutes of flight in which we could read on our Kindles (to which they’ll ask, “What’s a Kindle?”). While it’s barely an issue right now, it’s not one you may want to risk, and your time without electronics is just a blip during one day of your life. Let it go and take the time to enjoy a quiet moment with your thoughts while flying through the sky in a chair.

Cheers,
Lifehacker

Republished from Lifehacker

Discuss

(21 Comments)
  • [–]

    Gabriel

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 10:51 AM

    Just do what the pilots do when they can’t use their electronics and get blow jobs from the cabin crew

    • [–]

      Macca

      Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:08 AM

      Fleshlight?

  • [–]

    rb

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:16 AM

    I’ve always been of the opinion that they get people to turn their stuff off so their attention is undivided in the event of them needing to GTFO in a hurry…

    • [–]

      Morkai

      Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:38 AM

      “SIR! You need to follow instructions and make your way to the emergency exit door! The plane is on FIRE!!!”
      “…just one second, i need to post about this on facebook…”

    • [–]

      Caesar Wong

      Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 12:47 PM

      This.

  • [–]

    Carl Manson

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:16 AM

    I turn it off out of courtesy more than anything else. People freak out over it.
    At the end of the day, if they were really worried about it you wouldn’t be allowed to bring them on board with you.

  • [–]

    Pete

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM

    The definition of electronic device always confuses me. You can leave your watch on but you have to turn off your ipod nano.

    What if you watch is an ipod nano?

    • [–]

      Dan

      Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM

      It’s not just iPod Nanos. What about those irresponsible people who carelessly and blatantly leave their pacemakers switched on?

  • [–]

    Adam

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:34 AM

    No amount of RFI from portable devices is going to bring a plane crashing down. You don’t see busses crashing, trains derailing, or boats sinking because passengers were using portable electronic devices. It doesn’t interfere with any critical flight control systems, but as Lifehacker pointed out there is an extremely slim chance it could possibly interfere with some radio (and thus some navigation)systems IF they were in close proximity to them. Which they aren’t. And any pilot worthy of the title won’t rely on one navigation system to give them a position fix, they’ll use multiple redundant systems – such as GPS, Inertial Navigation Systems, VOR, etc.

    rb above is probably on the money. You don’t want people yapping on their phones or listening to their ipods during the safety brief or the higher risk portions of flight. You want undivided attention and relative silence.

    • [–]

      eBoB

      Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 5:15 PM

      The problem isn’t with nav systems, it’s flight controls and other ancillary systems.
      Modern aircraft use fly-by-wire for flight control systems. These are digital systems operated by millivolts, so it is *technically* possible that a RF device can induce a current in that cable and alter the operation of primary/ secondary flight controls.
      Shielding should negate most effects, but putting a pulse into the controller for the outboard ailerons at cruising speed would probably ruin you day.

  • [–]

    JAKE

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:52 AM

    People freak out as mentioned above when they see people not following the rule. Even my girlfriend gives me a hard time for only putting my phone on ‘AEROPLANE MODE’ rather than switching it off.

    Some people just live with heightened fear 24/7 and are too paranoid to argue with.

    : It’s easier to just comply.

  • [–]

    Scoon

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 12:50 PM

    Also, who wants a small laptop slamming into the back of their head if there is some kind of crash?

    Just deal with it people – YOU’RE NOT THAT IMPORTANT

  • [–]

    chrisp

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 12:52 PM

    Friends and family in medicine tell me that similar warnings in hospitals are bollocks.

    • [–]

      Scoon

      Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM

      As a dialysis patient, the last thing I want to hear about while I’m trying to get well is how you chundered on the weekend, so yeah, I appreciate the ban.

      • [–]

        chrisp

        Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 6:34 PM

        Not really the point though, is it? There are plenty of places I’d be happy with a ban as well. Just don’t come up with a nonsense reason, that’s all.

  • [–]

    MotorMouth

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 5:08 PM

    Who cares? Why is it so hard to just do as you are asked? I find it far more annoying that I can’t take my car keys onto a flight in my laptop bag,simply because I also carry a tiny Leatherman tool on the key-ring. But you know what? It’s their plane, their rules, so just have the common courtesy to do as you’re asked.

  • [–]

    poltak

    Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 5:14 PM

    “Sometimes I leave my phone on during take off on purpose by accident…”

    • [–]

      Paul

      Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:07 PM

      Yeah most planes take off with a purpose.

  • [–]

    Evan

    Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 10:09 AM

    Our planet is so saturated with radio communications at all wavelengths that in this band it glows like a star! How likely is it then that such transmissions will affect an aircraft? Please supply your own answer.

    Aircraft emergency frequencies are not used during takeoff or landing. They are for aircraft that are lost en-route. If there is a take0ff or landing emergency the aircrew will notify it on the departures or arrivals frequency they are using by default.

  • [–]

    Dean

    Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at 10:23 PM

    I’m always amused by the flight safety cards that say that Furbies are banned from commercial aircraft. I asked about this once and was told the reason was that they can’t be switched off – always had visions of Furbies running amok and taking over the plane with the hosties screaming ‘oh my god, they can’t be switched off’ – could be a good movie ‘Furbies on a Plane’.

  • [–]

    Colin

    Thursday, August 18, 2011 at 10:17 AM

    I can tell you from personal experience that mobile phones CAN cause serious interference. I used to just throw my old analogue phone on the other front seat of light aircraft before takeoff without any issues (years ago). Just after take the first time with a new GSM phone it started to hunt for the next tower and caused horrendously loud clickety-click interference such that I had to take my headset off until I could reach over and turn the phone off. Yes, everything electronic was in close proximity and probably the worst scenario, but there is a real risk.

Join The Discussion