There’s currently (at least one) pretty big flaw in the way classification works in Australia. Despite the fact that all video games are by law required to go through classification, the relatively recent explosion of mobile applications has meant that developers could release games to the public without classification through mobile app stores without needing to go through the classification board. But all that is officially about to change.
Ben Grubb at the SMH spoke to Home Affairs Minister Brendan O’Connor following the most recent SCAG meeting, and he confirmed that he was looking to change classification legislation to incorporate mobile apps. On the upside, the approach the government hopes to take is at least a lot more manageable than forcing developers around the world to submit their app to the classification board – In the summary of decisions from the SCAG meeting, the Attorneys General decided that mobile games would be “treated similarly to other online content, rather than stand alone computer games.” In other words, only apps that received complaints would be subjected to classification.
O’Connor confessed to Grubb that forcing all apps to undergo classification would place unbearable strain on the classification board:
“Theoretically the board must classify every application, but you would need an army, literally an army of classifiers to get through the applications because the growth has been exponential and for that reason we’re going … to a complaint-based approach.”
Even more interesting is how these changes will impact players like Apple and Google. O’Connor believes that after a game has been classified (and not refused classification), distributors of the app would need to display the classification and where necessary restrict access to purchasing highly classified programs.
With the AGs essentially on hold until after the NSW election, the next chance for this to be agreed upon will be at the July SCAG meeting, and only after it gets the unanimous nod from Attorneys General countrywide would O’Connor be able to submit the changes to legislation.
As far as solutions go, this is probably a best case scenario for classifying mobile games. But it will be interesting to see how this works with Apple’s own classifications systems, which are notoriously unbalanced as it is.
[SMH]



















HereWeGoAgain
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 at 4:47 PMLet me guess. Only the successful apps will suffer from this because they’re the only notable ones. After thousands, even millions of users experience an app and enjoy it thoroughly, it will only take one person that makes it their day job to complain, to cripple and restrict an awesome release. Media classification fail Australian Government! I don’t know why I was expecting any other outcome.. *sigh*.
Tristan Scott
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 at 4:52 PMWhat’s to stop a small group of dissidents flagging every app on every marketplace, completely overwhelming the classification process? Not that I’m suggesting it should be done, but our shonky classification system (or rather, a lack of R18+ rating) annoys enough people that I could see this happening.
Someone think of the children!
Dan Miller
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 at 4:53 PMWhy I see it is the the product is not physically sold in Australia therefor the classification laws don’t apply. iTunes is a web store that’s based in the states, so only their classification laws should apply.
Iain Graham
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 at 5:48 PMMore importantly: Why are they working on this and not on the games classification system?
simon c
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 at 6:03 PMhttp://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin
“Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
This country does not deserve books, music, films or even speech.
While were on the subject of software – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_video_games#Australia
Longer than any other nation listed.
Dear ADF members, enjoy your death in foreign lands. Its not like you were defending anything good.
Nathan Dabkowski
Wednesday, March 9, 2011 at 7:27 PM@Dan Miller All sales in Australia are handled by Apple Australia.
Also, this wouldn’t restrict people anymore than they currently are. As with movies on the iTunes store, restrictions are impossible to enforce and are limited to a popup asking to confirm that you are over a certain age. The same currently applies to “Apple Classified” apps.
A.A
Thursday, March 10, 2011 at 5:53 AMWonder what Apple will have to change in its app store to display ACB classfications-currently only Apple’s “+” ratings are used. iTunes uses ACB type ratings for TV and movie content only.
Adam Weber
Thursday, March 10, 2011 at 10:04 AM@ Simon, just because you will not be able to play the latest Mortal Combat, does not mean you should insult the ADF like that.
Australia is a great country and if you cant see that, I advise you go to another country, where
you can play all the little games you want then.
boc
Thursday, March 10, 2011 at 2:08 PMMobile games on a complaint by complaint basis?
There’s no real reason for mobile games to be an exception.
So, they should lump it like the rest of media or the rest of media should be provided the same complaint by complaint basis.