
Bluntly stating that they’ve failed to compete with any of the major smartphone players, Elop, a former Microsoft executive, minced no words in the memo, which included the following bit:
“The first iPhone shipped in 2007, and we still don’t have a product that is close to their experience. Android came on the scene just over 2 years ago, and this week they took our leadership position in smartphone volumes. Unbelievable.”
Elop not only called out Nokia’s lack of innovation in recent years, he even suggested that latching onto another smartphone platform was a possibility. Doom and gloom as this scenario may seem, it’s actually a good thing for Nokia. We’ve been saying for a long time now that Nokia was travelling down a path of suck when it comes to their software. And finally, they realise change is necessary… radical change.
Elop compared Nokia’s situation to a man on a burning oil rig who jumped from the rig’s platform into freezing waters to save himself. He said Nokia is on a burning platform (which they poured gasoline all over) and it’s time for them to jump.
Praising Apple’s commitment to user experience, and Android’s ability to attract the masses through innovation, Elop evaluated the current state of Nokia as well. While indicating that the MeeGo platform is promising, he worried MeeGo would be obsolete by the time a device hit the market, and conceded that Symbian’s time has come and gone. Ultimately, he says a single product alone can’t save Nokia, and that they need a unified ecosystem across all devices, whether it’s one they create, or one they adopt.
While Nokia has tried to woo developers with Symbian’s openness, the truth is that they’ve had an ambivalent attitude towards their smartphone OSes, and it shows. In fact, the main problem with Nokia smartphones is not the hardware. It’s the software. The N8 and N97 phones were both well-constructed disasters, even by Nokia’s standards.
When using their smartphones, rarely do the hardware and software feel like they’re working together to deliver a quality user experience. It seems like if the internal hardware is up to speed, the OS is a mess. And when Nokia introduces something innovative on the software side, the phone lacks the proper hardware to make proper use of that innovation.
In the past, it was easy for Nokia to fall back on profits from international dumbphone sales. After all, they had the best-selling phone in the world. But now that the dumbphone market is drying up and smartphones are increasingly viewed as just phones by the average consumer, Nokia no longer has that security blanket. And in that spirit, Elop attributed Nokia’s decline on a lack of leadership, a lack of internal collaboration and, most importantly, a lack of innovation.
Ah, innovation. Once upon a time, Nokia used to innovate. What Apple did for smartphones in 2007 with the iPhone, Nokia did for dumbphones in 1996 with the introduction of the 2160, which was lightyears ahead of most other phones. Even in the ’00s they had some imaginative products; for example, the 6800, which featured one of the first foldout QWERTY keyboards on a phone, or even the N95, which made tech geeks swoon prior to the iPhone’s release. But when the industry focus shifted to software, Nokia fell behind, because their strength had always been hardware.
Nokia says they’ll start talking about the future on Friday. But where should they go from here? The possibility of Nokia functioning strictly as a hardware company sounds amazing. They make AWESOME hardware. They always pack great cameras in their phones. The build quality is always top notch. And when was the last time Nokia suffered anything resembling an Antennagate scandal? The only thing missing from their devices is a good mobile OS. If they adopt the Android platform (which would force them to conform to a set of required specifications) and put all their effort into hardware R&D, Nokia could really churn out some quality phones and tablets. Maybe then, they could become relevant in the tech world once again. [The Register via Engadget]



















maddogeco
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 7:20 AMcan poeple get over this idea of andriod on Nokia is so stupid. Anybody suggesting it is an idiot an has never owned nokia.
Think about Android needs a Qualcomm chip nokia has partnerships with TI and Intel. boths of which support Meego.
Meego can run Android apps so there is a catalog ready to run.
Meego hasn’t been dropped its in active development This is all a massive marketing campaign a strange one but.
The difference between the n8 and the iphone4 comes down to marketing and the sheep who watch the pretty iPhone ads.
on the 11th a Meego phone will be announce and i will buy it. If a Nokia with WP7 or Android comes out I’ll buy a E7 with Symbian^3 because is good to work with and easy to develop for.
Melly belly
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 9:39 AMYup i agree, I for one really enjoy the Nokia N8 i actually like the s3 os, and i too HATE the idea that Nokia would conform and use android. WHY? that whole idea makes no sense, id rather see nokia develop there own os before jumping on that bandwagon.
Stephen Earp
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 12:43 PMI think the point is, though, that what Nokia needs IS a bandwagon – they have lost their strong following, and as much as the truth sucks, its been lost to Apple and Google.
I was Nokia fanboy for a long, long time. N97 killed me. How on earth do you expect Nokia to compete with the big A and G when they provide an OS that only the minority are now supporting? The answer: Make yourself a member on a bandwagon.
While it is indeed sad to see Nokia going down the gurgler, I can’t believe it’s taken this long for an exec to come out with a flame thrower and turn it on the Nokia offices!
Time for a new horse Nokia, you’ve been running the wrong race!
Nick Barsha
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 6:13 PM>Android needs a Qualcomm chip
Hmmm, lets see:
Moto Droid/2/X/Global: runs ANDROID, with a TEXAS INSTRUMENTS OPMAP 3
Samsung Galaxy S/Tab: Runs ANDROID, on a HUMMINGBIRD
Viewsonic tab runs ANDROID, on a NVIDIA Tegra 2
Those are all ARM architecture chips, not Qualcomm chips. It even runs on x86 desktops so now you are wrong on 2 counts. Lastly, the nokia N8 has a ARM 11 cpu anyway (which is simply a vastly outdated version of all the chips listed above)
Ollie
Friday, February 11, 2011 at 9:38 AMYou don’t normally hear such a clear correct answer to a blog complaint, well done!
M
Friday, February 11, 2011 at 9:54 AMAs someone who works for a Telco in Australia, I get to see what phones do well and what don’t. We also see the repairs/warranty claims for said phones when they go wrong.
The N97 was a dud, as the article said the software was the killer. We got to the point in our store where we would recommend other options to keep people away from them, because we knew that every 2nd N97 that walked out the door would be back in a matter of weeks to send away for repair.
We hoped with the N8 Nokia would have finally sorted their shit out and gotten it right. By all accounts the hardware was alright, and we hoped that they’d improved the cohesion of the software and hardware. But alas, the N8 is now just as bad as the N97, even to the point that Vodafone have extended the DOA period from 28 days to 42 days only for the N8. I personally sold 4 of them in the 2 weeks after it was released. All 4 have come back to me for repairs/warranty claim, one customer has been through 3 alone, and in the end got authorisation to change phones on the contract.
In terms of what’s been good over the last few months with sales vs warranty claims, the HTC Legend is definetly king for reliability (from the shops point of view). It’s about the only phone I haven’t ever seen a warranty job for, not to say it doesn’t happen, just never it our store.
mark
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 2:04 PMHow you even include the iPhone when talking about smartphone market ahare is beyond me. Between Nokia and Android they have near 65% of the market compared to Apple’s 16%, which dipped slightly in Q4 2010 results. Just because the editors here like them doesnt mean the rest of us do.
That 30 odd percent of the market that Nokia has also includes the phone hardware compared to Android which as you know is made up of numerous manufacturers.
Its true that innovation is lacking on the hardware side, I mean my N8 only adds HDMI, Dolby surround, 3D graphics acceleration, USB support and 12MP camera to name a few on top of all the previous innovations Nokia has made.
This constant nonsense commentry from the US about the death of Nokia and how good the iPhone is has become painful. Please note USA, you are the BACKWATER of the telecommunications world. The iPhone mearly put a bit of smart into a phone for dumb people. The iPhone is not the phone of choice in the rest of the world, its popular in the US because the network operators want it to be. This is because Apple is a closed system that generates more income for you networks. Thats why they dont like Nokia. Because I can side load content through my PC or via SD card I can avoid costs, with Apple I have to do it through iTunes and the network gets its bit as well.
My guess is all the media will turn up to pat themself on the back in anticipation of Nokia announcing their death only to find James Brown is not dead. Possibly a good bit of marketing from Nokia for a change
Nick Broughall
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 2:13 PMSources for those figures?
Bernhard de Kok
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 2:24 PMLately I find the US as irritating as the next man, but where are you coming from when you say the US is the backwater of the telecommuncations world? What facts have you got to support this?
nicky
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 3:58 PMBernhard, i have to agree with mark…the US telecommunications industry does little more than butt-rape its customers, and they have no idea!
my US friend said “hey, i can get the Samsung Captivate for $200″,
to which i replied,
“yeah, if i signed up for a 2 year contract, i’d get it for FREE…it would also be UNLOCKLED with zero restrictions, i could update to Froyo as soon as it came out, and i could use it all over the world”
US customers buy locked phones with some key features blocked (wifi hotspot!!), which they can ONLY use in america and ONLY on 1 network…wtf?
Bernhard de Kok
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 4:19 PMSorry Nicky. It seems I missunderstood, I was thinking from the technology and engineering viewpoint. From your response, You and Mark must be referring to the user and client relations point of view.
On a technology standpoint I would say that the 1 Network you must be talking about is Verizon as it’s a CDMA network whose phones are not compatable in most countries. Although I think they work in Hong Kong.
AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile all use GSM, but their frequencies are all different. But don’t go knocking them too much for that as we have a similar issue here with Telstra, Optus and 3 all having disparate networks. For example, a HTC HD Desire only works on 3′s network.
As for locked phones, I think it’s the norm in Australia as well, just about all phones purchased on a plan a locked. Although we are able to buy unlocked phones outright for some handsets.
Nick Barsha
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 6:00 PM> side load content through my PC or via SD card I can avoid costs,
um yeah, android does this, and it has overtaken iOS in the States. To show just how much of a fool you are, it overtook iphone sales in the US before it did in the rest of the world.
ADANALI
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 10:26 PM…”The iPhone is not the phone of choice in the rest of the world, its popular in the US because the network operators want it to be. This is because Apple is a closed system that generates more income for you networks. Thats why they dont like Nokia. Because I can side load content through my PC or via SD card I can avoid costs, with Apple I have to do it through iTunes and the network gets its bit as well.”
YOU HAVE NAILED IT BRO!!!
RIGHT ON!
John
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 8:55 PMWhen the 6800 was mentioned I immediatly thought of the E70 and this picture: http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/images/e70_tot8.jpg
From http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone
(Both contain swearing, so I guess NSFW)
John
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 8:58 PMWhoops, forgot to mention that all that is from ’07. But I guess some of that page is still relevant.