First Impressions: Panasonic’s 3D Viera Plasma

Gizmodo AU


In the middle of this year, the TV market is going to be attacked by bigger, better and badder flat panels. This new breed of screen does everything its predecessors do, but adds one new little feature: 3D Panasonic this morning was the first manufacturer to show off one of their 3D TVs, and I was fortunate enough to get a taste of what’s to come…

The most important thing to note is that this is not the same 3D you saw when you went to watch Avatar at the movies. The glasses that will come with the new 3D plasmas aren’t your passive polarised type that look like cheap Buddy Holly specs (or even those “designer” glasses you can get now). The glasses with the new 3D Viera displays are battery-powered active shutter glasses, which sent a different signal to each eye 100 times a second in sync with the 3D display from the TV. They also look like they come from the future, which not only makes you feel cool in your geekiness, but also means you can wear them over prescription glasses comfortably, while an adjustable nose piece helps them fit kids faces.

The display itself looks identical to any other Viera model you see on store shelves. Somewhere in the front is an IR transmitter that beams out the signal to sync with the glasses, but it certainly doesn’t stand out. And that’s worth mentioning – not only does the 3D panel look just like a normal 2D screen, but it also displays normal 2D, Full HD content as well. Two dimensional content Panny showed us on the set looked pretty sweet, that’s for sure.

And as for 3D performance – it was impressive. Just like when watching 3D at the cinema, I developed what I’m beginning to call a 3D headache, but that doesn’t mean it was bad. The 3D content they showed us leant heavily on the gimmicky side though – balls flying at the screen, asteroids flying at the screen, water splashing up at the screen, sand being kicked up at the screen… You know, pretty much anything to make you feel like something was coming straight for you. The illusion is sort of broken when the object disappears meters in front of you, but it still looks good.

The glasses have a pretty good viewing angle, and they still worked about 4-5 metres from the screen. As a battery saving feature, they automatically switch off if they aren’t receiving the IR signal for a period of time, but they do switch on again when you turn back to the screen. And unlike polarised glasses, they also work if you turn your head sideways (if you’re lying down, for example).

At the moment, there’s still no price or exact date set for launch. There’s also no firm decision as to how many pairs of glasses will be included in the box. But what is known is that buying the TV is just a part of your system upgrade if you want to get 3D in the home – you’ll also need to buy a 3D capable Blu-ray player and an HDMI 1.4 cable. And that doesn’t even begin to answer the question of content…

Personally, I’ll never be buying a 3D TV thanks to the fact I get those wonderful 3D headaches, but if you love the idea of watching sports and blockbuster movies in 3D at home, and aren’t too worried about binocular dysphoria, you’ll almost definitely be impressed by the Panny panel.

Discuss

(10 Comments)
  • [–]

    Shane

    Friday, February 19, 2010 at 4:37 PM

    I think I’ll wait for the holodeck…

    Although, knowing my luck, I’ll die they day it’s announced :P

  • [–]

    Steve

    Friday, February 19, 2010 at 6:49 PM

    I’ll be holding out for the 3DTVs that don’t need glasses at all – anything released before that is just an interim solution, as I see it now.

    • [–]

      Namarrgon

      Sunday, February 21, 2010 at 3:50 PM

      I suspect you’ll be waiting a while then.

      Despite some people claiming we’ll have autostereoscopic (glasses-free) 3D TVs in as little as 5 years, unless we have a radical breakthrough in technology, they won’t be much better than what we have now. The main limitation of the current (parallax and lenticular) technologies being, you have to sit in the sweet spot (or perhaps one of up to 5 sweet spots), and keep your head still, or your eyes will get images from the wrong viewpoint and the illusion breaks. That’s inherent to the approach used, and can’t really be fixed. Also, they suck for plain 2D content, though that at least can be improved.

  • [–]

    Jason

    Friday, February 19, 2010 at 6:55 PM

    Nick any idea on model sizes? I’ve got a 65″ Panasonic plasma which I love and, while I’m very keen on upgrading to 3D, I wouldn’t want to “downsize” my screen to, say, 50″ just to do it.

    • [–]

      Nick Broughall

      Monday, February 22, 2010 at 11:29 AM

      They’ll start at 50-inch, but I’m sure they’ll be bigger as well…

  • [–]

    Graham Jupp

    Friday, February 19, 2010 at 8:10 PM

    Hi Nick, from what I’ve read and experienced, RealD 3d movies dont lose the 3d effect if you tilt your head as they use circularly polarised lenses in the glasses.

    On the other hand IMAX 3d and older methods use 90 degree polarized glasses and you will lose the 3d effect with that method if you tilt your head.

    Sony is teaming with RealD for their Viera range and should be producing 3d TV’s that support passive glasses with the circularly polarized method from what I understand, no doubt they may also support LCD lenses as well so you will hopefully have the best of both worlds if you want to invite 10 mates around and tell them to bring their own glasses.

    Regarding your headaches, do you normally wear glasses or do you have one eye that perhaps has vision problems? This might contribute to the problem if that is the case.

    • [–]

      Nick Broughall

      Monday, February 22, 2010 at 11:30 AM

      Thanks for pointing that out. As for my headaches – nope, I have perfect vision. Never needed glasses. For whatever reason my brain just can’t handle forced 3D…

  • [–]

    Elliot Shepherd

    Saturday, February 20, 2010 at 1:30 AM

    Polarised glasses work when you turn your head sideways… at least the new ones do (avatar for example). They are circular polarised (clockwise/counter-clockwise).

  • [–]

    David Torp

    Saturday, February 20, 2010 at 4:46 PM

    So how come you’ve decided the Samsung Series 8 and Series 9 LED 3D LCDs Panels and 3D goggles demonstrated at the CES Expo in January 2010 don’t qualify as being first? Last time I checked January comes before February.

  • [–]

    Namarrgon

    Sunday, February 21, 2010 at 3:59 PM

    Sony’s range is Bravia, not Viera.

    TVs have been produced with circular-polarised filters, and they work fairly well. The glasses are a lot cheaper, but the tradeoff is that they work by polarising pixels alternately, so that your left eye sees every second pixel and your right eye sees every other pixel. This halves the resolution of the image, and can give visually-distracting artifacts if not done very carefully.

    However, TVs that support passive polarised glasses *will not* work with active LCD-shutter glasses. It’s one or the other.

Join The Discussion