Online dating is a hellscape, but the U.S. House Oversight and Reform subcommittee is fed up with just how shitty apps like Tinder, Bumble, and Grindr have been with regard to their users’ safety and privacy. Yesterday, it launched a new investigation into dating apps for doing an inadequate job of screening for minors, and inappropriately selling or sharing personal data.
The subcommittee sent out four letters to Match Group, Inc, The Meet Group, Inc, New Grinder LLC, and Bumble Trading Inc. All four contain the same language, and basically outlines concerns that underage users can sneak their way onto dating apps by simply lying about their age. The letters also take issue with the fact that screening policies for sex offenders aren’t uniformly enforced, even within the same app.
“Our concern about the underage use of dating apps is heightened by reports that many popular free dating apps permit registered sex offenders to use them, while the paid versions of these same apps screen out registered sex offenders,” writes Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, chairman of the subcommittee on economic and consumer policy. “Protection from sexual predators should not be a luxury confined to paying customers.”
[referenced url=” thumb=” title=” excerpt=”]
In particular, the letters reference the case of Joseph Meili, who pleaded guilty to third-degree molestation after being charged with sodomizing, raping, and kidnapping an 11-year-old girl he found through a dating app. It also referenced a UK report that found several dating apps, including Tinder and Grinder, failed to prevent child sexual exploitation due to weak age verifications. The report, which was the result of a public records request, also found multiple cases of child grooming as a result. Another joint report by ProPublica, Buzzfeed and Columbia Journalism Investigations found that while Match Group screens for sex offenders on its Match service, it did not apply the same policies to Tinder, OkCupid, or PlentyofFish.
While most of these sites claim to have policies that prohibit minors from using the service, the fact is many don’t have strong mechanisms in place to prevent minors from simply lying about their age. Most of the services rely on users reporting profiles they come across. Tinder has previously told Gizmodo that it uses a combination of manual and automated moderation and review to prevent minors from joining the platform, saying it spends “millions of dollars annually” on the effort.
Aside from inadequate screening measures, the subcommittee is also taking issue with reports that consumers “may not receive adequate notification of the commercial use of their sensitive personal information” such as sexual preferences, gender, employment, drug use, and politics. For instance, Gizmodo recently discovered Tinder’s new panic button shares user data with ad-tech companies.
As part of the investigation, the subcommittee is requiring the four companies to provide a mountain of documents pertaining to the apps’ monthly users, how much they pay for the service, age distribution, privacy policies, policies pertaining to sex offender screening, customer complaints regarding minors on the service. It’s also requesting details on what data is collected, who the data is shared with, and whether data collection is required to join the service. On top of all that, the subcommittee is demanding companies disclose whether private messages between users are reviewed, and all communications with law enforcement agencies. All companies involved have until February 13, 2020, to comply.
Gizmodo reached out to the four companies involved for comment, we’ll update this post when we receive a reply.