Amazon, the biggest book vendor in the United States, recently started shipping preorders of Margaret Atwood’s book Testaments. The problem, notably, is that Atwood’s book is not supposed to launch until September 10. Amazon is violating the embargo that all sellers of the book have agreed to. And it’s indie bookselling rivals are pissed.
The book, which is a sequel to her seminal work, The Handmaid’s Tale, has been one of the most anticipated novel releases this year. It’s already in development as a series at Hulu in the U.S., and just today was shortlisted for the coveted Booker Prize. Its leak would be tantamount to someone leaking the finale of Game of Thrones to Amazon customers who pre-ordered the new season.
Atwood’s publisher, Penguin Random House, has already apologised for the embargo breaking in a series of tweets and a statement to Publisher Weekly.
…to the bestselling The Handmaid’s Tale. In order to ensure our readers around the world receive their copies on the same day, our global publication date remains Tuesday, September 10.
— Penguin Random House (@penguinrandom) September 4, 2019
Amazon has not yet commented publicly, but Gizmodo has reached out to the online giant and will gladly update this post should Amazon respond.
While Amazon customers who pre-ordered found a welcome surprise in their mailbox thanks to the gaff, indie booksellers are feeling very slighted. Publisher Weekly noted Lexi Beach of Astoria Bookshop. She tweeted her frustration in a thread last night.
A reasonable person might argue that a vendor should see consequences for every copy of an embargoed book they release early. https://t.co/bx5a5gKAdW
— Lexi Beach (@lexiatwork) September 4, 2019
Paul Swyden, owner of Silver Unicorn Books in Massachusets, noted that Amazon wasn’t even mentioned in Penguin Random House’s statement.
In case you're curious about how little leverage PRH has, they wouldn't even mention Amazon by name in this statement. And, for those of you who don't deal with this every day, PRH as a whole is bigger than every other publisher. In most cases, much, much bigger. https://t.co/otjhoneVoY
— Paul Swydan (@Swydan) September 4, 2019
Amazon isn’t a stranger to releasing things when it shouldn’t, and to some extent, it can be forgiven. As someone who is often subject to embargoes myself, I’m fully aware of how one simple mistake can lead to a busted embargo. It can happen even if no one involved wants it to happen.
In the field of journalism, a broken embargo is a big deal. You can lose access to products, miss invites to big events, or simply not get briefed on news. Publications have been blacklisted for embargo violations.
Things are a little different in the retail world, but the rules generally still apply. A broken embargo could mean a damaged relationship with a publisher. It could mean not getting that publisher’s next big book on time, which could lead to lost sales. Smaller independent booksellers are very cautious of this because they can’t afford to take any other approach.
But Amazon is the biggest retailer in the U.S. It can violate an embargo (and again, we have no reason to believe this embargo violation was intentional), but publishers still have to do business with it because it sells the bulk of the books people read. It’s got the whole publishing industry over a barrel and all the publishers can do is beg Amazon not to do it again.
The problem is… Amazon is developing an awfully bad habit of breaking the rules. This is the third time in the last year the company has released something early when it had zero right to. In November 2018 Amazon accidentally streamed an episode of Doctor Who days early to anyone who bought the episode.
Then in December, a bootleg of the cult favourite One Cut of the Dead appeared on Amazon’s streaming video service without the permission of the U.S. right’s holder. In both instances, as with the Testament’s embargo violation, it appears that it was an accident.
But Amazon is so big and makes so much money that you’d think it would be able to do a better job of mitigating gaffs like this. And it is not just embargo violations that show Amazon’s careless regards for what’s legal or appropriate by the agreements shared between retailers and publishers and suppliers.
In June the New York Times had a report noting Amazon’s tremendous problem with counterfeit books — including handbooks used by people in the medical field.
Then late last month the Wall Street Journal reported on Amazon’s inability to police counterfeit products on its site — many of which violate federal safety guidelines.
Amazon can get away with it because it’s just that big. But maybe its time for publishers and suppliers to stop playing so nice with the retail giant. If it can do whatever it wants than what impetus do others have to abide by the rules Amazon overlooks.