Most of the major TV makers, like LG and Sony, were eager to show off their enormous 8K sets in January, but if you were struck with TV envy, you were frustrated because no one at the show was willing to talk about how much over 33 million pixels would cost. But Samsung announced U.S. availability and pricing today for its 8K Q900 series—so prepare to spend $US15,000 ($21,144) if you want 85-inches of 8K TV.
Editor’s Note: We’ll let you know when we have Australian pricing and availability.
The 85-inch Q900 starts shipping today (with a current estimated ship day of 7 to 10 days), and besides having more pixels than you might need at the moment, the Q900 will also have most of the other features we’ve come to expect from Samsung’s top of the line TVs. Which means an ambient mode where the TV dims when not in use—matching or complementing the wall and surrounding lighting, support for AMD Freesync via HDMI, support for Apple AirPlay 2 and iTunes Movies and TV Shows, and soon support for Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa.
But, naturally, the big reason to buy the Q900 series is the gigantic number of pixels. It’s got a resolution of 7,680 by 4,320 pixels—twice that of a 4K TV. Unfortunately there’s almost no content available in 8K, and instead you’ll have to deal with 4K or lower resolution content upscaled to 8K.
At CES in January, Samsung gave me a look at the possibilities of its upscaler. In a controlled demo, in which Samsung supplied the 4K and lower resolution content it was upscaling, the 8K panel was impressive, but the real test will be trying to watch all the other stuff—like old TV shows upscaled from 480p, or a Netflix stream that’s gotten fuzzy because everyone in the neighbourhood is eating up the bandwidth.
We’ll have a better idea of how the TV handles all that when we review it. If you can’t wait, you can drop your $US15,000 ($21,144) now. Though Samsung is selling it in multiple sizes—all of which are cheaper. The 75-inch version ships March 15 for $US10,000 ($14,096), the 65-inch version ships March 1 for $US7,000 ($9,867), and the 165cm version ships March 1 for $US5,000 ($7,048). That’s really expensive, but in fairness, the 165cm version lands firmly in the very high end for a 4K 165cm set. Whether 8K will be worth it (and I’ve heard good arguments both for and against it) remains to be seen.
Also things that remain to be seen? The cost of the even larger 98-inch 8K set. It will hopefully arrive later this year and you can expect to spend around the same as a very affordable car.