Speaking from the White House on Tuesday, Donald Trump bragged to The New York Times that he was on “the world’s most secure” telephone system, joking, “The words just explode in the air.” According to that same report, however, the President is also using what might be the world’s least secure system: the ancient, unsecured Android phone he had before taking office.
Last week, the Times reported that Trump “traded in his Android phone for a secure, encrypted device approved by the Secret Service.” Previously identified as a Samsung Galaxy — likely an S3 which came out in 2012 — the Android phone was widely believed to be his primary tweeting device. In defiance of all security standards, the president is reportedly still using it.
This is where the story gets really weird. In an early version of Wednesday’s Times story, the newspaper reported that Trump was keeping himself company with “his new Android phone.” In an edit catalogued by change-tracking site NewsDiffs, the article was updated to read “his old, unsecured Android phone, to the protests of some of his aides.” The Times has not issued a correction.
“That’s how you do it — you strip out all the functionality so it becomes a brick that does the one thing he needs it to do,” a former senior NSA official told NBC News. “There are things an adversary can to do a mobile phone — turn on the mic, for example — that make it really dangerous for a guy in his position to carry an unmodified device.”
And those dangers have only increased. As last year’s Russian hacking debacle illustrated, America’s cyber security is more important than ever. But when your boss is President Donald Trump, it’s hard to imagine anyone telling him no. “No one is taking away his Twitter,” senior Trump adviser Boris Epshteyn told USA Today in November. “He’s his own man.”
We’ve reached out to The New York Times for more information on the change in the story about Trump’s phone habits. We’ve also asked why the newspaper didn’t issue a correction since there’s difference between Trump using a military-grade, ultra secure smartphone and an old Samsung that’s notoriously hackable. Whether the Times report is correct or not, it’s utterly unnerving that nobody seems to know if the president is using the kind of device that, previously, our nation’s enemies could only dream of.