Apple Has To Pay $US533 Million For A Patent Infringement Within iTunes

Apple Has to Pay $US533 Million for a Patent Infringement Within iTunes

The US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has ruled that Apple must pay $US532.9 million because iTunes infringed three patents owned by a Texas-based patent licensing called company Smartflash.

The patents -- relating to digital rights management, data storage and managing access through payment systems -- were said to be used by Apple without Smartflash's permission. The Texan company originally sued Apple in May 2013, claiming that iTunes infringed the patents in the way it was used to download songs, videos and games. It was claimed during the case that around the year 2000, co-inventor of the patents in question, Patrick Racz, met with Augustin Farrugia to discuss the technology. Farrugia later joined Apple.

Apple tried to escape the trial, claiming that the technologies in question were too basic to patent anyway. US District Judge Rodney Gilstrap disagreed, and now -- after deliberating for eight hours -- a jury has said that Apple used the Smartflash patents without permission and did so wilfully. Smartflash originally sought $US852 million in damages, though the total has slipped to $US532.9 million.

A big win for Smartflash, for sure -- but a rather small dent for Apple, the most valuable company in the world. Indeed, it's perhaps somewhat of a reminder that with success comes the ability to play dirty, as -- just like in this case -- money can neatly sweep away problems that would bankrupt other organisations.

That doesn't stop Apple being unhappy with the case though. "We refused to pay off this company for the ideas our employees spent years innovating and unfortunately we have been left with no choice but to take this fight up through the court system," an Apple spokeswoman told Reuters at one point. Now, it has no choice but to pay. [Reuters at Re/code]



    Now, it has no choice but to pay.

    Except Apple does have a choice - they will appeal as they said they would. What is an extra couple of million dollars on lawyers fees compared to paying a patent troll the ridiculous figure of $532.9 million? I know what I would rather do and I'm sure Apple's shareholders would agree with me!

    A more interesting article would be on how often these patent troll cases actual result in money changing hands and at what fraction they are paid out compared to highest court award in the case. I would imagine it would be less than 10% and wouldn't be surprised if it is less than 1% if ever.

    Last edited 26/02/15 8:57 am

    technologies in question were too basic to patent

    But a round cornered rectangle is complex?

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now