There's A Naturally Occurring Nuclear Fission Reactor In West Africa

There's a Naturally Occurring Nuclear Fission Reactor in West Africa

In May 1972, in a uranium enrichment plant in France, scientists examining ore from a mine in Gabon, West Africa, discovered that a natural nuclear reactor had spontaneously manifested in that region in the Earth's primordial past, churning out approximately 100Kw worth of energy continuously for a few hundred thousand years about 1.7 billion years ago.

In order to understand how the natural nuclear reactor came about, it helps to understand a little of the history and science of nuclear reactions.

Nuclear Reactions in a Nutshell

According to the International Atomic Energy Commission (IAEA), there are over 400 nuclear power plants operating in over 30 countries; and despite recent catastrophic safety failures like the tragedy at theFukushima Daiichi in 2011, nearly 70 new nuclear power plants are currently under construction. So why do we keep building such potentially dangerous facilities? Power that, despite such disasters as Chernobyland Fukushima, megawatt for megawatt is actually, overall, generally considered safer and "greener" than power generated via coal or gas.

This type of nuclear power is created when an isotope, frequently uranium 235 (U-235), is bombarded with a neutron. The collision typically breaks the isotope into two pieces, each containing half of the neutrons and protons of the original atom, in a process called nuclear fission. During the reaction, a small amount of mass is lost, which is the result of a tiny bit of matter being converted into a relatively large amount of energy.

In a typical reactor, a whole lot of U-235 is assembled and then bombarded with neutrons; in each collision between U-235 and the neutron, two more neutrons are produced along with the release of energy. As long as there are enough U-235 isotopes about, those extra neutrons will cause additional reactions. The reactions grow exponentially in a process called a chain reaction that produces even more energy. Nuclear power plants harness the energy from these controlled chain reactions and convert it to electricity that powers things like this MacBook Air on which I'm writing.


Uranium is one of the heaviest elements, with an atomic weight of 238.03. Pertinent to this article, only three isotopes of it are found naturally in the Earth's crust; U-238, which makes up 99.3% of all uranium, U-235, which comprises most of the remaining .7%, and U-234, which is present in only an infinitesimal amount. U-238 is only mildly reactive and does not make good fissionable material. U-235, however, is outstanding at being split and producing lots of energy.

When it comes out of the ground, uranium ore is comprised of the three isotopes in their relative proportions. In order to be fissionable, the percentage of U-235 in the ore must be increased from .7% to about 5% of the whole. This process is known as uranium enrichment. In the typical enrichment scenario, the uranium is converted into a gas, uranium hexafluoride (UF-6), and the gas is separated by weight (remember, U-234 and U-235 are lighter than U-238). The separation allows enough of the heavier uranium to be removed, and the remaining substance ultimately has a suitable concentration of U-235 for fission.

Gabon Nuclear Reactor

You may ask: "If uranium ore is unsuitable for nuclear reactions without a complicated, manmade enrichment process, how did a natural one get started nearly two billion years ago?" Good question, and the answer is not "aliens."

U-235 has a significantly shorter half-life than U-238, so in the far distant past, it should have been far more abundant, and in greater concentrations than it is today. Scientist Paul K. Kuroda proposed in1956 that this U-235-rich ore, under the right conditions, would have supported nuclear fission, and chain reactions, that would form natural nuclear reactors.

There are two theories about how the Gabon reactor worked, although both assume a cycle of chain reaction, cessation, cooling, repeat, over a period of thousands of years, until the fissionable material was exhausted.

One theory proposes that the uranium was covered with groundwater, which moderated the neutrons and provided an environment that supported a chain reaction. The energy generated eventually heated the groundwater to boiling, and it steamed away. With the groundwater gone, the reaction stopped. Eventually, water seeped back into the uranium cavern, and the process repeated, until the concentrations were too low to support further reactions.

The second theory, which is not well accepted, proposed that the burning reactor released certain rare earth elements, like samarium, gadolinium and dysprosium, which absorbed the neutrons and stopped the chain reaction, for a time, or in certain places, only to have it pop up again nearby.

Details of the first theory were reported in Space Daily in 2004:

This similarity (to a geyser) suggests that a half an hour after the onset of the chain reaction, unbounded water was converted to steam, decreasing the thermal neutron flux and making the reactor sub-critical.

It took at least two-and-a-half hours for the reactor to cool down until fission Xe (xenon) began to retain. Then the water returned to the reactor zone, providing neutron moderation and once again establishing a self-sustaining chain.

Proof of the Oklo Fossil Fission Reactor

So how do we know this ever happened at all? Several reasons.

First, in the initial, French investigation in 1972, it was found that the concentration of U-235 from the site was much lower than it is typically observed in nature; in fact, the concentrations from the Oklo samples were similar to those found in spent nuclear fuel.

Second, the French also discovered discrepancies in other isotopes from the site, including neodymium and ruthenium, both of which are consistent with U-235 fission.

Third, in a 2004 study Washington University physicists investigating the site discovered elevated amounts of zirconium, cerium and strontium that were produced via nuclear fission.

Fourth, the American scholars also identified that the Oklo deposits contained the largest concentrations of fission-produced xenon and krypton ever found.

Lessons from the Oklo Reactor

One surprising discovery from Oklo is that, unlike our fission reactors that produce significant toxic waste that no one wants to store (think Yucca Mountain), Mother Nature safely disposed of hers. According to the Wash U researchers, the natural reactor safely trapped its toxic waste (Xe and Kr-85) in the chemical compound, aluminophosphate:

It is fascinating to think that a natural nuclear reaction can reach the critical conditions, and that it is also capable of storing its own waste.

On a final note, it is reassuring to know that naturally occurring U-235 does not exist today in the concentrations necessary to start or sustain a modern day natural nuclear reactor. So, although someday we may have to live through another Chernobyl, at least we'll know we only have ourselves to blame.

Bonus Facts:

  • Three Mile Island, the nuclear power plant accident near Middletown, Pennsylvania, is the most serious power plant accident in U.S. History. It led to no deaths and no injuries to plant workers or the nearby community. It was still rated a level 5 on the INES, even though it really should have just been rated a level 2.
  • If you camped out at the plant at Three Mile Island during the accident that happened there in 1979, you'd have received only an additional 80 millirems of exposure during the duration of the accident. For reference, if you've ever had your spine x-rayed, you'd have received about double that just during the few seconds of the x-ray. If you were around 10 miles away from the reactor during the accident, you'd have received about 8 millirems or about the equivalent ionizing radiation of eating 800 bananas, which are naturally radioactive. There are no known deaths/cancers/etc. that resulted from the Three Mile Island accident.
  • Public reaction to Three Mile Island went extremely overboard from what the actual event warranted. This was largely due to misinformation in the press; misunderstanding of ionizing radiation among the general public; and the fact that, not 12 days before it happened, the movie The China Syndrome was released. The plot of the movie was how unsafe nuclear reactors were and just about everyone in the movie but one of the main characters was trying to cover it up. The China Syndrome movie title's concept comes from the premise that if an American nuclear reactor core were to melt down, it would melt through the center of the Earth to China. Getting around the fact that it is actually the Indian Ocean that is on the opposite side of the Earth from the U.S., not China, and the obvious problems with the "melt through the Earth" premise, it couldn't have been a better timed movie as far as free advertisement through the press due to the Three Mile Island incident. The movie was nominated for several academy awards, including best actress by Jane Fonda.
  • Amazingly, if we were actually able to convert matter perfectly to energy with 1 kg of matter being completely annihilated, the energy produced from just that small amount of matter is about 42.95 mega tons of TNT. So an adult male weighing in at around 200 pounds has somewhere in the vicinity of 4000 megatons of TNT potential in their matter if completely annihilated.
  • This is about 80 times more energy than was produced by the largest ever detonated nuclear bomb, the Tzar Bomba, which itself produced a blast about 1,400 times more powerful than the combined explosions of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
  • To further illustrate, 1 megaton of TNT, when converted to kilowatt hours, makes enough electricity to power an average American home for about 100,000 years. It is also enough to power the entire United States for a little over 3 days. So 1 kg of some matter being completely annihilated would be able to power the entire United States for about four months. One average adult male then, when completely annihilated, would produce enough energy to power the U.S. for about 30 years. Energy crisis solved.
  • On a completely baffling scale, a typical supernova explosion will give off about 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 megatons of TNT. *cowers in the corner*

Melissa writes for the wildly popular interesting fact website To subscribe to Today I Found Out's "Daily Knowledge" newsletter,click here or like them on Facebook here. You can also check 'em out on YouTube. This post has been republished with permission from

WATCH MORE: Science & Health News


    So nuclear power is as natural as solar and wind power? Awesome. Gotta bring this up next time an anti nuclear person has a rant and see how they respond.

      It might be natural, but so is death... Not all that is natural in this world is good for us.

        Meh... Death is kinda natural, and definitely good, for the planet in the long run. Although I personally am hoping for a cure ... :)

        Last edited 04/12/13 9:28 am

        Looking forward to death actually. Life is great and all, but I believe there is more.

          As long as it doesn't require religion, I agree 100%....
          Although not looking forward to it so much as curious...:)

          Last edited 04/12/13 10:58 am

      In terms of viability it's also the king of the castle. Take America for example, using nuclear power for a long time with little to no incident. People that decide to build nuclear plants on coastlines (yes I know they need large quantities of water, but so do coal and gas plants which manage fine without being coastal) and fault lines are taking incredible risks. One other fundamental concern is the fashion in which the plants are run, as long as corners are not cut and safety is put before production they're safe.

    This article reminds me of this link: in which it poses a question: "Which of the following would be brighter, in terms of the amount of energy delivered to your retina:
    A supernova, seen from as far away as the Sun is from the Earth, or
    The detonation of a hydrogen bomb pressed against your eyeball?"

    The answer is very surprising:
    "Applying the physicist rule of thumb suggests that the supernova is brighter. And indeed, it is ... by nine orders of magnitude."

    I actually read about this ages ago, and I thought it was fascinating, although the source I read it in suggested that a meteor strike started it off. While I am not opposed to nuclear power in theory, in practice it is not a perfect process, leaving large amounts of waste. If we could harness the weak nuclear force we could get all our power from a single chunk or uranium, and there would be no waste, because there would be nothing but lead left! Of course this is all speculation, no-one has any idea at all on how this would be possible.

      A lot of waste currently produced can be used for fuel, reducing it significantly.

        Still, this merely results in more and more concentrated waste. As soon as someone figures out a good way to dispose of this waste I'll be all for nuclear power (although I still think geothermal energy is the best fuel source).

          Shoot it into space!!!

          Current methods are pretty good. They combine it with some inert glass like (or maybe it is just glass) product and fill up metal barrels. Put them in the bottom of an unused uranium mine (it's already radioactive).

            Shoot it into space!!!

            sounds like a good solution, until you factor in the enormous energy required to get it to leave earth's gravity pull.

            Unless of course you were being humorous...

              Yes, I was. That's why I put a more realistic solution underneath ;)

      Thorium my friend, Google Thorium!

        Ya, in theory it's lovely, unfortunately it needs several decades of practical research and billions of dollars of investment before we can have those reactors.
        The thing is that cold war weapon needs meant that uranium rector development was pretty much the only game in town for decades, with titanic subsidies.
        Thorium is a completely different process so practical reactors are a loooong way away, assuming they ever get significant investment.

    This discovery is not unusual, such discoveries of long-dead natural fission reactors have been found in India, Australia and other countries.

    Title is wrong: there "WAS" a naturally occurring reactor.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now