Tito’s, the reasonably-priced Texas vodka brand with a lively Twitter presence, has sent 11 tweets over the past 24 hours clarifying that, no, its beverage does not meet the CDC’s recommended minimum alcohol content for hand sanitizer. Contrary to what various Twitter users apparently believe.
But why did people turn to Tito’s, which contains no more than the industry standard of 40 per cent alcohol concentration? Which is priced slightly above the brown bag liquor, the natural choice for bulk elixirs? Which is over twice as expensive per litre (at a Manhattan Staples)?
Per the CDC, hand sanitizer needs to contain at least 60% alcohol. Tito’s Handmade Vodka is 40% alcohol, and therefore does not meet the current recommendation of the CDC. Please see attached for more information. pic.twitter.com/QNEFOXxYPQ
— TitosVodka (@TitosVodka) March 5, 2020
Per the CDC, hand sanitizer needs to contain at least 60% alcohol. Tito’s Handmade Vodka is 40% alcohol, and therefore does not meet the current recommendation of the CDC. Please see attached for more information. pic.twitter.com/3gS4Cv92Xn
— TitosVodka (@TitosVodka) March 4, 2020
Per the CDC, hand sanitizer needs to contain at least 60% alcohol. Tito’s Handmade Vodka is 40% alcohol, and therefore does not meet the current recommendation of the CDC. Please see attached for more information. pic.twitter.com/DtpfsAHZKJ
— TitosVodka (@TitosVodka) March 5, 2020
Tito’s first picked up on this March 3 tweet from a user who claimed to have seen a recipe including their brand: “I just saw a recipe to make your own hand sanitiser using Tito’s vodka. Uh, no. That’s why we have grocery store vodka.”
I just saw a recipe to make your own hand sanitizer using Tito’s vodka. Uh, no. That’s why we have grocery store vodka.
— Wendi Aarons (@WendiAarons) March 3, 2020
The source of the recipe is unclear, but two people linked to a Good Housekeeping article on making home cleaners, which curiously makes no mention of Tito’s or vodka or hand sanitiser. A post on this forum from yesterday, however, claims that the article did include a hand sanitiser concoction with vodka, as does @COVID19Prepper:
A recipe for hand sanitizer https://t.co/duyu3XnJIt, even though I have a good stockpile from @bathanbody (so I smell great and I’m germ-free!) #COVID19 #COVIDー19
— COVID-19 Prepper (@COVID19Prepper) March 4, 2020
Another user linked to a since-updated USA Today piece titled “Can’t find Purell or other hand sanitisers? Here’s how to make it at home with vodka or rubbing alcohol.”
True, the internet is suffering from a confirmed Purell shortage. Presently, a used 12-pack is going for $US575 ($872) on Amazon.
While Tito’s could have easily sat back and watched the hand sanitiser money roll in, a representative told Gizmodo that Tito’s is for drinking.
“As soon as we saw the incorrect articles and social posts, we wanted to set the record straight,” the company said in an email. “While it would be good for business for our fans to use massive quantities of Tito’s for hand sanitiser, it would be a shame to waste the good stuff, especially if it doesn’t sanitise (which it doesn’t, per the CDC).”
Good for Tito’s because its counterparts are out to lunch on this issue.