Nuking A Hurricane Would Be A Really, Really Bad Idea

Nuking A Hurricane Would Be A Really, Really Bad Idea
Image: Getty
To sign up for our daily newsletter covering the latest news, features and reviews, head HERE. For a running feed of all our stories, follow us on Twitter HERE. Or you can bookmark the Gizmodo Australia homepage to visit whenever you need a news fix.

Did we learn nothing from Independence Day? Nuking things for nuking’s sake just doesn’t work like we think it might. Take a hurricane, for example. It’d be relatively immune to whatever ordinance Donald Trump ” sorry, humanity ” might throw at it.

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published 8/28/11, but given recent world events, we felt it was time to share the good word once again. It has been updated for clarity.

First of all, there’d be the obvious nuclear fallout. Because hurricanes are cosiest in the tradewinds, the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says all that residual awfulness would spread quickly and efficiently to areas well outside the hurricane’s predicted cone of travel. Firing a nuke into Irene in 2011 would have likely made that minor hurricane into a beast more formidable than Isabel or Katrina, which at a Category 5 was the worst of the worst.

But what of the physics? Say we were immune to fallout and could lob nukes into storms to our heart’s content. Would they do anything to a storm?

Again, NOAA is less than optimistic about our chances. As a species we’re just too damn weak:

A fully developed hurricane can release heat energy at a rate of 5 to 20×1013 watts and converts less than 10 per cent of the heat into the mechanical energy of the wind. The heat release is equivalent to a 10-megaton nuclear bomb exploding every 20 minutes. According to the 1993 World Almanac, the entire human race used energy at a rate of 1013 watts in 1990, a rate less than 20 per cent of the power of a hurricane.

But Jack! Something, something shock waves! I read about those once and how they can be deceptively deadly!

Well, yes, you’re right my little pyro, but when it comes to hurricanes those shockwaves still wouldn’t be powerful enough to downgrade a hurricane from Cat5 to Cat 2:

[A shock wave] doesn’t raise the barometric pressure after the shock has passed because barometric pressure in the atmosphere reflects the weight of the air above the ground. For normal atmospheric pressure, there are about ten metric tons (1000 kilograms per ton) of air bearing down on each square meter of surface.

In the strongest hurricanes there are nine. To change a Category 5 hurricane into a Category 2 hurricane you would have to add about a half ton of air for each square metre inside the eye, or a total of a bit more than half a billion (500,000,000) tons for a 20 km radius eye.

And don’t think we could preempt a hurricane by targeting its tropical storm/depression beginnings. Even if such a storm used 10 per cent of the energy of a hurricane, that’s still an incredible amount of energy. Besides, there are far too many storms and depressions that develop each year for such a strategy to be practical anyway.

[NOAA via Matt Yglesias]