The Bigfoot Lawsuit Against California Actually Makes Some Really Good Points

The Bigfoot Lawsuit Against California Actually Makes Some Really Good Points

A California woman who claims she saw Sasquatch perched in a tree last year is suing California for refusing to accept what she now knows to be true: Bigfoot inhabits the San Bernardino mountains.

Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

Claudia Ackley – who has been researching Bigfoot for the last two decades – was hiking with her two daughters, aged 11 and 14, near Lake Arrowhead last March when her children became paralysed with fear, Ackley told local news outlets. At first Ackley assumed they had seen a bear, but she then observed what appeared to be an approximately 360kg creature resembling a hairy Neanderthal just a few metres away, about 9m up in a tree.

Once she and her daughters were safe, Ackley called authorities to report the Sasquatch sighting, but they insisted she had seen a bear. That denial inspired Ackley to file a lawsuit against the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the state Natural Resources Agency last month, accusing California of dereliction of duty for failing to protect Bigfoot and infringing on her constitutional rights.

Today, we are proud to share that lawsuit with you.

Ackley’s peition makes some valid and interesting points, starting strong with an introduction that invokes esteemed conservationist President Theodore Roosevelt.

The Bigfoot Lawsuit Against California Actually Makes Some Really Good Points
Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

Ackley then asserts that by refusing to acknowledge the existence of Sasquatch, the state is ignoring the “overwhelming evidence” of what could be “one of the greatest discoveries of our time”.

The Bigfoot Lawsuit Against California Actually Makes Some Really Good Points
Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

Perhaps more importantly, by ignoring the evidence of Sasquatch, Ackley claims the state is putting its citizens at risk of attack by “these giant primates”.

The Bigfoot Lawsuit Against California Actually Makes Some Really Good Points
Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

The petition then continues to a statement of facts, which includes some strong points about Giganto Horridus Hominoid, the “hominoid or primate” that is “commonly known as Bigfoot”, that are difficult to disagree with.

The Bigfoot Lawsuit Against California Actually Makes Some Really Good Points
Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

But the real victims here are Ackley and others like her that want to educate others on the existence of Sasquatch.

The Bigfoot Lawsuit Against California Actually Makes Some Really Good Points
Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

Screengrab: Superior Court of the State of California

While Ackley’s lawsuit doesn’t offer any specific proof of Bigfoot’s existence, she reportedly intends to submit a mountain of evidence in court to support her case, including testimony from “wildlife biologists, wilderness experts, and police forensic officers”. Additionally, one of her daughters captured a video of what she saw. The video, which was included in the local ABC news segment, shows what appears to be trees and shadows.

Ackley’s hearing, scheduled for March 19, could be a watershed case for cryptozoologists who just want their research to be taken seriously. In the meantime, the San Bernardino Sun reports she has left snacks, including soft drink, corn chips and fruit, near the site of her spotting, “along with a voice-activated book with pictures inside, made by Ackley in an effort to communicate with Bigfoot”.

Read the lawsuit in full below:


The Cheapest NBN 50 Plans

It’s the most popular NBN speed in Australia for a reason. Here are the cheapest plans available.

At Gizmodo, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. We have affiliate and advertising partnerships, which means we may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page. BTW – prices are accurate and items in stock at the time of posting.