Texas Man Sentenced To 15 Years For Targeting Gay Men For Home Invasions Via Grindr

One of four accused criminals who posed as gay men on Grindr to set up home invasions was sentenced this week to 15 years on hate crime and other charges including kidnapping, carjacking, and use of firearms in the commission of a crime, the Tyler Morning Telegraph reported.

21-year-old Frisco, Texas man Nigel Garrett pleaded guilty and is the first to be sentenced from the group. Anthony Shelton, Chancler Encalade Jr, and Cameron Ocion Ajiduah are all awaiting sentencing after admitting their roles in the incident:

When Garrett and the other men entered the victim's home, they tied the man up with tape, beat him up and made derogatory statements to the victim for being gay. The armed men also stole the victim's property and his car during the home invasion.

The indictment also said the defendants posed as gay men on Grindr and conspired to assault the victims during four home invasions between January 17, 2017 and February 7 in Plano, Frisco and Aubrey. The indictment said the men committed the crimes because of the victims' sexual orientation.

According to CNN, the remaining members of the group could face up to a $US250,000 ($318,026) fine and life in prison.

The use of dating apps to target people for crime is nothing new - sexual assault is the primary concern, though online dating can potentially expose users to malicious parties of all kinds. The problem is, as Quartz noted earlier this year, while the risk may be relatively low and apps like Tinder and Grindr may be no more dangerous than other ways of dating, there's virtually no statistics or research to quantify how safe it is. Research has also shown the apps in question are often not particularly secure and riddled with potential exploits that could reveal personal information.

As TechCrunch noted, an app like Grindr can be used to easily obtain the location and details of a potential victim, though they also leave behind trails of evidence. In this case, the trail of digital evidence left no doubt as to whether the attacks were hate crimes.

"The Department of Justice has made prosecution of violent crime a priority," Acting US Attorney Brit Featherston said in a statement, per the Telegraph. "The Eastern District of Texas, in prosecuting this case and others like it, intends to demonstrate that this priority is something more than just a slogan."

[Tyler Morning Telegraph/TechCrunch]

WATCH MORE: Tech News


Comments

    The indictment said the men committed the crimes because of the victims' sexual orientation.

    Really? It's not just that they wanted to rob people and grindr gave them an easy way to pick targets? I could see that argument holding up if they just used it to target them and beat them up. But they were robbing them. That seems like the main point of their action.

    On a related note, I don't think we really need "hate laws", assault is still assault, robbery is still robbery, etc. I feel like we're trying to inject an extra motive into crimes just to justify extra punishment.

      I think they are tying the "hate crime" part to the derogatory comments not the use of Grindr. If not, I agree that simply using a gay app to find targets for normal criminal acts shouldn't be a "hate crime" - it's just a normal crime with a novel targeting method.

        The problem I have with hate crime laws is that they're trying to say the same offense is worse depending on who you committed it on. Here's an example;

        Someone bashes a gay guy it's called a hate crime and punished more severely than "just" bashing a straight guy. But what if the attacker *thought* the straight guy was gay, does that make it a hate crime? What if the attacker thought the gay guy was straight, does that mean it *wasn't* a hate crime?

        Like I said, I just think calling something a hate crime is an excuse for making a harsher punishment. In which case, maybe they should be rethinking the range of punishments for the *actual* offense.

Join the discussion!