Was It A Good Idea To Beam Our Best Techno To An Alien World?

In the year 2030, a powerful radio transmission originating from Earth will arrive at a potentially habitable exoplanet located approximately 12.4 light years away. Should any alien intelligence be there to receive it, they're in for quite a treat: This binary stream of data contains short musical clips from some of the world's best electronic musicians. It's part art, part science - but considering we know virtually nothing about extraterrestrials, should we really be calling attention to ourselves?

Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech

For three days in October, organisers of the Spanish Sónar electronic music festival pointed the 32m-wide European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association (EISCAT) radio antenna towards the sky and sent bursts of radio signals towards GJ 273 - a red dwarf star (sometimes called Luyten's Star) that hosts two known planets, one of which, GJ 273b, may be capable of supporting life. With the help of astronomers from METI (Messages to Extraterrestrial Intelligence) and the Institute of Space Studies of Cataloniar (IEEC), the Sónar team beamed digitally encoded clips of music from such artists as Autechre, Holly Herndon, Jean-Michel Jarre, Modeselektor, Matmos, Kode9 and Laurel Halo.

In April 2018, they will do it again, sending 15 more tracks from some of the 33 artists who are taking part in the festival. You can listen to the 10-second-long tracks beamed during the first transmission here (Niva Kraviz's is my favourite, and shame on Jarre for rehashing an old clip from Oxygène).

Called Sónar Calling, the project is a "celebration, an artistic-scientific experiment and a collective reflection open to humans and extraterrestrials," according to the festival website. The point of the exercise, aside from attracting the obvious publicity and selling more concert tickets, is to promote "the first contact of humanity with an extraterrestrial intelligence". Sounds flowery, but there's some actual science going on: Unlike the traditional, passive SETI approach of listening for alien radio signals, METI is trying to make actual contact with ET.

Which leads me to the obvious question: Is all this such a good idea? Sure, this exercise sounds harmless and fun, but it isn't a zero-risk endeavour. Aliens may very well be listening, and we have no idea how they might respond. The whole thing seems a bit premature, possibly even reckless.

But Douglas Vakoch, president of the not-for-profit METI, doesn't see it that way. To him, Sónar Calling is a good way to test and refine some basic interstellar communication principles, and educate the public about the METI concept. It's also a way to see if aliens are actually out there.

"We're testing one solution to the Fermi Paradox called the Zoo Hypothesis," Vakoch told Gizmodo. "According to the Zoo Hypothesis, perhaps extraterrestrial intelligence is much more widespread than we usually think, and even nearby stars are populated with advanced civilizations. In short, they already know we are here, but they are simply watching us, like we watch animals in the zoo." Vakoch's hope is that we send a message that's interesting enough to warrant a response from an extraterrestrial civilisation.

The other point of the exercise, says Vakoch, is to develop a process that can be replicated, over and over again, with multiple stars.

"This preparation includes developing the messages we send, encoding them in a format that can be transmitted with available facilities such as EISCAT, and archiving our messages so future generations will remember what we have sent, and so they will know when we can first expect a reply," he said. "If METI succeeds in creating the organizational infrastructure that allows the sort of long term thinking that encourages astronomers to look for a reply from GJ 273b a quarter of a century from now, the project will be a remarkable success, even if we don't receive a reply from ET."

The Sónar Calling project is reminiscent of previous attempts at interstellar communication, including the Aricebo Message (1974), Russia's Cosmic Call (1999), the Lone Signal Project (2013), and to a lesser extent the Golden Record on NASA's two Voyager probes. But these efforts were one-off signals, and with no follow-up.

"We have transmitted to the same star on three successive days, giving scientists on GJ 273b time to ask their colleagues at other observatories to watch for repeated transmissions, letting them confirm that they have detected an artificial signal," said Vakoch. "Moreover, we'll send a second set of transmissions in April 2018, giving extraterrestrials orbiting Luyten's Star an additional six months to prepare an extensive observing campaign of Earth, allowing further confirmation of our signal."

In addition, the transmission designed by IEEC and METI scientists is "propaedeutic" in nature, meaning that each section of the message contains information about how to decode the next section. According to the Sónar Calling team, a sufficiently sophisticated alien intelligence should be able to detect this transmission and perceive it as coming from an unnatural source. Music from the first transmission is now hurtling towards GJ 273b at the speed of light, and it will arrive in late 2030. So the earliest we could ever hope to hear a response will be in 2043.

Image: Sónar Calling

Each contributing artist had to compose and specially prepare their music for transmission. Given the very slow data transmission rate of 500 bits per second (that's about 250,000 times slower than MP3 playback), the musicians were required to compose brief 10-second-long pieces, and at a very low digital sound quality. For the audiophiles among you, it was a PCM encoding of only eight bits, in mono, and with a sampling frequency of just eight kilohertz. No data compression was used. Each piece was preceded with a digital "tutorial" that describes the digital coding of sound waves using different frequencies and harmonics. The clips were sent from the EISCAT observatory in Tromsø, Norway on October 16, 17 and 18.

In terms of the risks, Vakoch believes that any civilisation that has the capacity to travel to Earth to do us harm already knows we're here, "so there is no increased risk of an alien invasion from our transmissions". Vakoch says we have a natural tendency to think that it's risker to do something than not to do something, so we think it's riskier to transmit a message than not to transmit.

"But when we stop and think about it, sometime it is risker not to do something," he says. "Some people choose not to get vaccinated to prevent a serious disease, but that decision actually increases their risk of getting sick. And if enough people make that same choice, this lack of action would be devastating for public health." Vakoch is working under the rather big assumption that contact would be ultimately good for us, and that a benign ETI could pull us from the primitive mode we currently find ourselves in. Or at the very least, that proof of alien existence might steer our cultural, social and political values (not to mention our technological development) in a more positive direction.

Of course, erring on the side of caution is not always a bad thing. As Vakoch himself admits, a central aim of this project is to test a potential solution to the Fermi Paradox. But if there's one thing the Great Silence has taught us is, it's that the Galaxy is completely empty of observable extraterrestrial intelligence. At about 13 billion years old, and measuring just 150 million light years across, a single ancient interstellar civilisation could have populated every single star system in the Milky Way by now, and then some. The Fermi Paradox isn't just an idle philosophical problem - it's actually quite terrifying. There's something going on out there that's preventing ETIs from overtly colonizing the Galaxy. We don't know what that "something" is, but it's not irrational to be worried about it.

Vakoch, on the other hand, says we need to be alert of our biases that lead to fear.

"We have a lot of things to fear in our world today. Nation is pitted against nation. We are destroying our environment. It would be comforting to think that the biggest threat to our survival is from some malevolent alien out there that can be thwarted by simply staying quiet," he told Gizmodo. "I wish I could say that somehow humanity would be safer if we simply avoided any intentional transmissions to GJ 273, but in good conscience, I can't."

[Sónar Calling]

WATCH MORE: Science & Health News


Comments

    Again a reference of the Fermi "make it up as we go along" Paradox, an equation with so many "guessed/assumed" variables, that when written on toilet paper, its only good use is ... still wiping your arse. I don't see any harm in transmitting, but it really is a "wank" project, as mentioned, great publicity.
    Inverse Square Law goes to work on any radio signal we can transmit, and basically limits anything we send to a few light years, sure, more if the transmission is amplified, and directed, as in this case, maybe a few hundred light years, but after that, its just white noise (the hiss you here on a radio with no station, noise from the universe itself). Just to give some perspective, our galaxy the milky way is around 100k light years wide, its one of 100 billion other galaxies. The odds of life in this radius, in my opinion are good, the odds of life that knows how to receive, amplify and demodulate a signal from a carrier in this area? Well, lets just say I'm much more in favour of downing an eccy and spending the extra money on more speakers and amps.

      And if some alien life form is capable of travelling 12+ light years (120 trillion km) in some reasonable period of time (eg. a year or two) then I doubt that they communicate using something as primitive radio signals.

      And if they transmitted any cRap music, I'm sure the aliens would think this world was completely nutz and devoid of intelligent life, thus declaring war upon earth. They'll waste this entire planet just because of some of the crappiest noise ever produced outside of the bog had been received.

      Well that makes my idea of a song called "Earth is garbage, dont come here, you'll hate us" kinda pointless, even if somehow I do convince them to send it!

    Yum eccy's.

      Exactly. Send out several packages of trance, Some eccy and glowsticks and well have the sickest aliens ever.

      Last edited 18/11/17 9:51 pm

    Put it this way:
    100 years ago we were only just within reach (barely with a concerted effort)of putting together the apparatus to have some small chance of recieving such a signal. It could be crudely done, but the myriad locations frequencies etc. puts it all out of reach. In that time we have gone from pencil and paper to hand held computers. Bottom line - we are so new to the block that it is mindboggling. Our solar system, so I hear, is a billion years newer than the average. So our neighbours are probably where we will be a billion years progressed from now - either long dead or fantastically advanced. So what threat is there from somebody who has watched our development all along? I doubt that they would come trillions of miles to make canned food, when the technology to come trillions of miles almost certainly includes the ability to make canned food as if by magic. And is anything on our planet even edible to them with an alien biology? Such concerns are clearly child-like. They are spawned from the minds of our own backwardness (Picture the dark ages on steroids - that's us!). If we wanted a planet we could terraform both Mars and Venus as well as half a dozen moons by the time we are at their probable level. The effort would be something like this: "legion of robots, I hereby command you to terraform venus"... [cracks open the beer]. Seriously, we are already being replaced with robots right now. In the blink of an eye human work ethics will be a mere fable to us. There will be no effort to anything, no more need for conquests or savage notions of war. Technology is a game changer.

    If I'm going to be exterminated by an alien species it had better not be because of techno

    I remember an Asimov short story about aliens who landed, after years of listening to US television and radio asked “where is Johnny Carson?”.

    Let's hope that the recipients don't treat it as another version of Vogon poetry.

    If we sent them some EDM, we'd better have sent them a few thousand doses of amphetamines too otherwise they'll never appreciate it.

    Best techno?
    Do those two words even go together?

    It would make more sense sending music by JS Bach. At least there would be a mathematical structure.

    Anyone else read the book "The Dark Forest"? I've read all the usual suspects but "The Dark Forest" is surely, easily the best science fiction novel ever written. Theoretically the basic premise of the book makes perfect sense and that is why I think this is a very bad idea.

    i thought it would be much more intelligible to send come music from some of our classical composers. im not against EDM, but from a intelligence point of view, classical music seems the more intelligent choice.

    Ironic misconceptions abound! I've been in SETI for 30+ years and all the science says that even our noisiest decade - the 1980s - dissipated into static before one light year. Yet people bandy movie cliches ("they already know all about us!") without lifting a finger to actually read about this. I've created a capsule summary about the METI debate (whether we should transmit), and if any of you are gifted with our greatest human trait - curiosity - you might give it a look: http://www.davidbrin.com/meti.html

    Heck even good science fiction ("The Three Body Problem" or my own novels "Earth" and Existence") is more cogent than the zealots who are leaping to shout "yoohoo!" into a weird cosmos without even consulting their scientific peers, let alone the public.

    -David Brin, author of the Postman

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now