Poor Guy Accidentally Steals And Then Destroys $391 Million Worth Of Ether Cryptocurrency

Thanks to a string of screw-ups and bugs, an unsuspecting developer recently took possession of an estimated $US300 million ($391 million) worth of the Ethereum cryptocurrency by accident. In an attempt to give back the money, however, the poor guy ended up locking up the funds permanently. In effect, that money is just gone.

Image: Gizmodo / Pixabay

So, this sucks for everyone. And obviously, hackers started the trouble. Parity, the cryptocurrency wallet service at the crux of this trainwreck, was recently hacked and robbed of $US32 million ($42 million) worth of Ether. In an attempt to patch the vulnerability and prevent hackers from stealing more, Parity accidentally introduced a new bug that affected multi-signature wallets. (These are wallets that, as the name implies, require several people to enter keys before funds get transferred.) Ether is the second largest cryptocurrency - second only to Bitcoin - so this number of wallets amounted to a very large amount of internet money.

Then things really got turned upside down. While Parity hasn't explained exactly how, a user called "devops199" mistakenly triggered the bug and took control of all multi-sig wallets. This screenshot of someone with the devops199 handle has been circulating on social media, and if it's the real user, they seem completely perplexed:

In the end, devops199 tried to reverse the process that was triggered by the Parity bug, but that simply destroyed all of the funds. More specifically, the bug caused a chain reaction of events that locked all multi-sig wallets in such a way that they can't be unlocked. In a security alert, Parity confessed about the situation, "This means that currently no funds can be moved out of the multi-sig wallets." While some report the amount locked is upwards of $US300 million ($391 million), others estimate that it's as low as $US154 million ($201 million). Regardless, a lot of money.

This all reads like a Greek tragedy of cryptocurrency carelessness, down to the pun in the name "Ether". There might be a third act, too. As The Guardian reports, it's possible that Ethereum users could agree on a "hard fork" by "by effectively asking 51 per cent of the currency's users to agree to pretend that it had never happened in the first place". This worked well a couple of years ago when $US150 million ($195 million) of Ether was stolen, though there's no guarantee it would work this time.

But that's the crypto life, baby. One minute no money exists, and the next minute, the money's there. Wait another minute, and it's gone again. Why needs government backed currency when volatility is so much fun?

[The Guardian]



    Cryptocurrency will continue to fluctuate all over the place. There are so many rules around doing shady shit with shares. No such rules for magic internet money.

    Huge firms do a keynote speech at a Tech conf about how Bitcoin is all pretend and about to crash. Price drops. Huge firm buys millions worth the next day. Sell a million, price drops, buy 2 millions. All this stuff is happening all the time because if you have the money or influence, you can.

      Which is why China banned ICO (Initial Coin Offerings), lack of and strong resistance to government regulation made them just put their foot down hard.

      Look at what just happened with Bitcoin. The currency has skyrocketed over the last week in response to this split that was about to occur. Now there is no split happening.
      Feels so shady, borderline insider trading.

        Its a ponzi scheme directed solely at idiotic liberturds and its working well. These guys will be long gone and sunning it up in Cancun before the basement dwellers are disturbed by mom changing the bottles at 2pm

    It's crypto currency. It's not worth anything, not until you have real money or a physical object you have traded for it.

      Which is where these idiots get ahead of itself. If one person buys in for one dollar then someone else says 'its worth a dollar fifty' where the f do these numbskulls think the other 50 cents will magically appear from to cover it when they 'cash out'? Then times that by the number of idiots who think they magically got rich but will NEVER see a cent, like any good ponzi scheme.

    You mean 0 dollars worth. Its monopoly money backed by nothing but words stating 'i say its worth this much'

    This article, and the guardian one it references, are technically inaccurate. The "developer" neither took possession of, nor destroyed the contents of those multi-sig wallets. He took control of and destroyed a library contract, which contained functions necessary for owners of those wallets to withdraw funds. The effect is the same, but the mechanism described in this article is misleading.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now