Google Pixelbook: The Gizmodo Review

I had to change how I think because of Google's new $US1000 Pixelbook. This gorgeous 2-in-1 is some of my favourite hardware for the price, but it's loaded with Chrome OS, the worst operating system you could put on your computer. If you've grown up a power user of MacOS, Windows, or Linux than Chrome OS feels like getting cut off at the knees, and hardware can't possibly distract you from how hamstrung Chrome OS is compared to its more mature competitors.

So in order to not spend another Chromebook review complaining about the severe inadequacies of Chrome OS, I decided to think like an ideal Chrome OS user. It was worse than that time I tried to stop drinking sodas, but as painful as living a wholly different existence was it made one thing very obvious: If you are an ideal Chrome OS user this is the very best laptop you can buy.

All photos: Alex Cranz/Gizmodo

So what is an ideal Chrome OS user? Google points to young people whose first computing device was a mobile phone instead of a Powerbook 520c. Their first interaction with Photoshop was an app on their Android or iOS device. The first games they played were simple mobile ones like Fallout Shelter or Asphalt 8. They don't know the beauty of overly tweaking an operating system with Quicksilver or Alfred, or modding the user interface with Rainmeter. For this new generation of computer users (IDC claims 58 per cent of schools use Chrome OS devices) the computer isn't a tool, it's a portal to the internet and everything beyond.

And when you understand those two big things about potential Chrome OS users -- that they view computers as portals the wider world and that they are more familiar with mobile apps, Chrome OS feels like a pretty dang nice operating system.

Last year Google began to officially implement Android apps in Chrome OS, and early this year Google began to take that implementation seriously, working with app developers to better support Android in Chrome OS. It was a clunky iteration because the Android apps were frequently not prepared to resize to the resolution of chromebooks like the Samsung Chromebook Pro. There's been improvement on that front, and now when I open apps like Adobe Lightroom and Comixology, I feel like I'm opening an application native to Chrome OS instead of a supersized app from my phone.

This is a very nice way to read a comic.

It's a crucial distinction that helps Chrome OS feel a little more mature -- even if it still isn't the powerful content creator that Windows, Linux, and macOS are. It's more like an iPad, only with a design intended for typists first.

It's easy to charge via USB-C.

The first thing you notice about the Pixelbook is just how well-designed the hardware is. Every single person I tossed it to would obsess over how thin it was (just 0.4 inches thick), how light it was (1kg). There's a solidness to the metal and glass chassis that doesn't leave you worried if it falls off the bed onto the floor or gets shoved in your bag and jostled around on the subway. The keys have a slightly rubbery feel when you press down that is soft and pleasant without feeling mushy, and the glass trackpad works as well as any you'd find on a MacBook.

And because it's a chromebook, and uses the ultra lightweight Chrome OS, there's no need to cool the processor with fans, so it's completely silent to never gets hot. In that way, it's a bit like an iPad. In fact, with the touch display, 360-degree hinge, and all the Android apps the Pixelbook frequently feels like a tablet itself. So comparing it to an iPad seems super natural. That device is also a mobile-first machine for a younger generation of computer users, and while it's a tablet, Apple has pushed the iPad Pro as a computer alternative for people who want an Apple device but don't want to pay the $US1300 or more required of a good macOS one.

It does sort of look like a book at a glance.

But the Pixelbook is noticeably more powerful than an iPad, which uses a completely different operating system and processor type. It's even more powerful than the Samsung Chromebook Pro, with configs ranging from the $US1000 Pixelbook configured with a 4.5-watt seventh-generation i5 processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 128GB SSD to the $US1650 Pixelbook configured with a 4.5-watt seventh generation i7 processor, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB NVMe SSD (that means it reads and writes data faster). The $US550 Samsung Chromebook Pro, by comparison, the previous generation's processor, and the much slower m3 version at that. It's also got only 32GB of storage and just 4GB of RAM. That means it's way slower, can store far fewer apps, and because of the RAM it will struggle with multitasking versus the new Pixelbook.

Both chromebooks rock 30cm displays with 2400 x 1600 resolution, a stones-throw from the iPad's 2732 x 2048 33cm display, but the Pixelbook is far faster than either. In WebXPRT, which benchmarks a computer by testing how well it edits images, creates spreadsheets, and processes complex equations in a browser, the Pixelbook scored a 453 -- right in line with devices like the Macbook Pro, LG Gram 14, and even the recent Razer Blade Pro. The Samsung Chromebook scored a 267 while the iPad managed an anemic iPad at 232. And on Geekbench 4, a synthetic benchmark that runs as an Android app on Chrome OS, the Samsung Chromebook had an iPad-like single core score of 2571 while the Pixelbook had a laptop-like 4168.

The palm rests are a nice soft rubber. It's great now, but I'd be worried about discoloration in the future.

Those exceptional benchmark speeds are immediately noticeable in just day to day browsing. I can have twenty tabs open on the Pixelbook, with Fallout Shelter running in the background and Netflix running in the foreground and there's no lag. The Samsung Chromebook always choked in a similar scenario, and iPads simply don't multitask at that level.

Battery life is a little less thrilling. When streaming a YouTube video it average about eight hours and 53 minutes -- even the latest 33cm MacBook Pro lasted 11 hours and ten minutes on the same test. But while it isn't best in class battery life when watching movies for hours on end, it's still more than enough for day to day browsing, writing and gaming. With general use I often went well into my second work day without reaching for a USB-C charger.

There's a wide array of apps for artists, but lag between the pen tip and the display could lead to frustration.

Where the Pixelbook really falters is with regards to the pen. Doing art on a Chromebook might be appealing, but between the $US100 price tag on the Pixelbook Pen and the slight delay between pen stroke and pen render I noticed on every single app I used it just doesn't seem worth it. If this is the only device you have and you absolutely need to draw or take handwritten notes, than do it, with practice you'll be able to adjust to the lag, but an iPad would definitely be easier to use.

Yet the Pen does have a trick that the iPad and the Samsung Chromebook (which includes a dinky little stylus) do not. This chromebook has Google Assistant built in. It's not just like Siri in an iPad, where you long press a single button. On the Pixelbook there's a dedicated button to launch Google Assistant. Once launched it works just as it would on your phone or a Google Home, and if you have the Pixel Pen you can use it to circle words or images on your computer and have Assistant immediately search the web for them. The feature doesn't feel like a fundamental alteration to how we interact with our computers, but if you're used to working on a mobile device and asking Siri or Google inane questions its now just as easy on a chromebook.

Google Assistant is actually pretty handy!

And when you consider the Pixelbook as the souped up next step for a person who primarily computes on their phone, it's absolutely wonderful. If you've ever stood in Best Buy and seriously considered an iPad versus a chromebook or laptop, then stop. Go buy the Pixelbook, it's the superior device for you, balancing the need to write with the need to consume nearly perfectly.

And it's almost the superior device for power users like myself. While I hated that I had to change my photography workflow on the Pixelbook (there's no CaptureOne and Photoshop is worthless compared to the macOS and Windows version) I sometimes didn't care. When I was rewatching Halt and Catch Fire last weekend it was the Pixelbook I reached for to idly play games, read comics, and google weird milestones in computer history. My phone, the iPad, those devices were forgotten. The Pixelbook still costs a not insignificant $US1000, but that's ok. This is the best possible device you can currently get for Chrome OS, and it actually feels like it's worth it.

README

  • This thing is very fast.
  • Battery life is acceptable, but could be better.
  • The design is really, really nice.
  • Seriously, there are few devices you'll hold in your hand that feel as nice as this one.
  • It's still Chrome OS, so don't complain when you can't edit a movie.

Spec Dump

Intel i5-7y57 • 30cm LCD • 2400 x 1600 at 235ppi • 128GB SSD • 8GB of RAM • 11.4 x 8.7 x 0.4 inches • Bluetooth 4.2 • 802.11ac • 2 x USB-C • 3.5mm audio out


Comments

    So what is an ideal Chrome OS user? Google points to young people whose first computing device was a mobile phone instead of a Powerbook 520c.
    Yeah, but honestly, who is that? I'd wager that the vast majority of people still end up using Windows or Mac at some point - and a Chromebook will frustrate the hell out of them when they find out they can't do X because it's not supported (or they're stuck trying to use an Android app).

    Really the biggest issue I have is the price - you can buy a decent Windows laptop for that amount, and get better utility out of it. It doesn't really justify its existence much more than the iPad Pro. The real success of Chromebooks has been in the cheaper end of the market. I love my little Chromebook as a web browser unit that I can actually type on, but it's no laptop replacement, and the OS still isn't worth laptop pricing.

      Load up a Linux install in a chroot / crouton and get some real work done

        Or don't bother and just use a Windows laptop.

        This is what you're missing - you and I might know how to do that, but most end users won't, and can't be bothered doing it. Why would they buy this when they could get a capable Windows laptop? Consumer tech doesn't survive on high end users.

          People who really want a chromebook just want to use google services and basic we browsing will do fine with this. If a power user happened to want a simple web machine a chromebook is fine. If they wanted to have the ability to load a chroot up from time to time, its good for that too.

          For many life is simpler just keeping Windows out of it

            None of that justifies the cost of this device, just the cost of the low end Chromebooks. Windows only complicates things until you find out your $1k+ Chromebook isn't much help as soon as you need to leave your web browser.

              If you need to leave the web browser (other than to use an android app) you aren't the target, unless you dont mind getting your hands dirty in a chroot - which was my point from the start

    I am that market! And there is not a better device available for my requirements at the moment.

    I am a Business Systems and Technology Manager for a SAAS company, with offices across 3 continents.

    Your comments of "severe inadequacies of Chrome OS", "Chrome OS feels like getting cut off at the knees", "worst operating system", etc had me literally laughing out loud, mostly about how stuck in the old world everybody else is.

    I remember the pain and hassle of windows, and managing windows networks, the total unsuitability of Linux as an office professional platform, and the separate universe of MacOS... wow seems like a lifetime ago on a different planet.

    Now days, everything I do is in the cloud, or by an App, and the very capable Android apps I have been using for months on Chrome OS keep getting better, and faster, every week.

    There is not a single gap or road block stopping me from being able to do every part of my work.

    I write documents, spreadsheets, presentations, build websites and web apps, manage domain security, and a team of 60 people, produce videos, edit graphics and photos, hold team meetings with collaberative project boards and video conferencing, complete HR onboarding / offboarding , oversee marketing campaigns, sales processes, customer ordering and billing, user support, and much more, in an ISO27001 accredited business, in the cloud... With ChromeOS.

    I know there are specialist roles that need specialist desktop apps, but in my world they are the exception and not the norm. Aside from those who need the obvious 'horsepower' to produce media and marketing content, I have found that the few others are stuck because they are working with legacy processes, or attitudes.

    See you in the cloud.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now