The Lego Ninjago Movie Feels Like It Was Put Together The Wrong Way

The Lego Ninjago Movie starts like a strobe light and ends like a night light. At first, it's bright, loud, fast, and in your face -- a constant barrage of visuals and sounds. Then it slows down considerably, focusing on the story and character development. One part is better than the other but neither is great, and, unlike Legos, they just don't fit together.

All Images: Warner Bros.

The third movie in Warner Bros. Animation's Lego series, The Lego Ninjago Movie is the worst of the bunch by a fair margin. The product of three directors and six screenwriters, it's nowhere near as smart as The Lego Movie nor as fun as The Lego Batman Movie. Instead it's a relatively basic adventure about a high school student named Lloyd (Dave Franco) who is reviled because his absentee father Garmadon (Justin Theroux) is the most evil being on the planet. However, in secret, Lloyd is also one of Garmadon's biggest adversaries, the leader of a secret ninja super team that constantly saves the city from Lloyd's father.

The Lego Ninjago Movie dives head first into this story, almost instantly revealing that this hated high school kid is also everyone's hero. In theory, the film's attempt to buck the predictable tropes of an origin story should be a good thing. But in Ninjago, it feels like you walked into the movie late and missed the first 20 minutes. First Lloyd is treated like crap, but then suddenly he's an awesome ninja with a bunch of friends and cool robots. Something doesn't quite compute.

After about an hour of seemingly non-stop Lego action sequences, with all the characters acting super-exaggerated and the whole aesthetic more akin to a music video than a major motion picture, the film slows down considerably as Lloyd and the rest of the characters go off on a quiet adventure out of the city to solve a problem bigger than Garmadon. The movie shifts to being about Lloyd having long, deep conversations with the other characters, finding out who he is, why he is who he is, and everyone else discovering what their purposes are, too.

This boring "getting-to-know you" stuff is actually better than the huge action sequences, mostly because it's not being forced in your face with flashing bulbs. The film finally takes time to show who the characters really are, and gives them issues to struggle with. If these scenes had come before the action scenes, it would have given then them much more impact. But this arrangement doesn't work. We don't care when the stakes are high, and by the time we do care, the film is over.

One surprising standout in all this is Dave Franco. While most of the other famous voice actors (which include Jackie Chan, Fred Armisen, Kumail Nanjiani, Michael Pena, Abbi Jacobson, and Zach Woods) all but melt into their roles, Franco's exaggerated, expressive range works wonders in a setting like this. By the film's final moments, you can feel his performance even through his plastic, yellow Lego face. And even though I hadn't liked the movie much up until that point, I connected, even for a brief moment.

There's just a lot going on in The Lego Ninjago Movie. Some of it is fun and clever, but mostly it elicits eye-rolls and silence. Like the Lego toys the film is based on, all the pieces are there, they just needed to be assembled properly. Unfortunately, someone forgot to follow the instructions.

The Lego Ninjago Movie is out now.


Comments

    I am a little confused - the movie doesn't follow the traditional structure and that is a bad thing? I liked that this wasn't an origin story. We've had origin stories. They are boring.

    Also, this was better than the LEGO Batman Movie because the LEGO Batman Movie was barely a LEGO movie. Think about it, what part of the LEGO Batman Movie couldn't have been done in any other medium? The last 10 minutes at most.

      The easiest way to answer your question is to implore you to watch the movie.

      You may? be disappointed.

      Its just disjointed, i've never been much for Ninjago and was hoping this would pull it out of the nether (for me) but it just cemented that i dont have room in my collection for any of it.

      It was just plain boring and not really all that engaging.

        I saw the movie on Sunday at the preview screening.

        I didn't find it disjointed at all. It follows a fairly linear plot, it just starts with the team already established. I still don't see that as a bad thing.

        Obviously films are going to connect with different people in different ways. I really enjoyed it.

    The plural of Lego is Lego. "Legos" is not a word. Thanks for your time.

    The Lego moves have been getting less Lego with each release.

    The first movie, nearly everything was Lego, with very few exceptions, mostly for story purposes.

    Second movie and we have real fog and clouds and then water. The Lego animated smoke and water in the first movie was awesome, why get rid of it?

    Then we get the third movie, and they have whole sections in a forest that is not Lego at all....

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now