Reports Of Russia's US Election Hack Keep Getting Scarier

A New York Times investigation offered some unnerving news on Friday. Not only was the hacking of electoral systems during last year's US election "more extensive than previously disclosed," the paper reports, multiple sources say that nobody's really examining the the attacks on a state or local level. The reasons why are as complex as they are alarming.

Photo: Getty

One thing is clear: A lot of registered voters in North Carolina, Virginia, Georgia and Arizona didn't get to vote on election day last year because their names weren't in the electronic poll books. We've known for a while that Russian hackers had infiltrated the servers of VR Systems, a company that provides the software for polling equipment. However, anonymous sources from the intelligence community told the Times that at least two other election software companies had been hacked as well.

How much damage did they do? We don't know. We might never know. From the Times:

Government officials said that they intentionally did not address the security of the back-end election systems, whose disruption could prevent voters from even casting ballots.

That's partly because states control elections; they have fewer resources than the federal government but have long been loath to allow even cursory federal intrusions into the voting process.

And it isn't just those concerns that are hampering an investigation either:

That, along with legal constraints on intelligence agencies' involvement in domestic issues, has hobbled any broad examination of Russian efforts to compromise American election systems. Those attempts include combing through voter databases, scanning for vulnerabilities or seeking to alter data, which have been identified in multiple states. Current congressional inquiries and the special counsel's Russia investigation have not focused on the matter.

Meanwhile, the intelligence community said back in January that Russian hackers didn't alter the vote count. But that assurance skirts around the idea that attackers could have tinkered with the back-end of the election software in such a way that voters in key counties of swing states couldn't vote at all. The notion that any foreign power could have taken this clever and dreadfully powerful tack is sickening to say the least.

We already know that the Russian hacking was bad. However, the takeaway from this latest investigation — and you should read the Times report in full to understand the broader context — is that, nearly a year after the fact, we still don't know how profoundly Russian hacking affected voting on America's election day. We might never know, since the investigation is fractured on federal, state and local levels. On top of all that, it remains unclear if the issues that kept people from going to the polls were caused by Russian hacking, interference from another foreign power, or simply software glitches.

That not knowing is the really scary thing about the 2016 US election. Without finding clarity on what went wrong last year, the American people are bound to feel sceptical about how the midterm elections will go next time around. Inevitably, the lack of confidence in the election process could simply stop people from going to the polls, which is never a good thing in a democracy.

There's still time. The midterm elections are 14 months away, and a lot of things could change before then. No matter what, though, if you're American go ahead and plan on voting, regardless of what you might fear will happen. Voting is the most important thing you can do as a citizen. You can't get turned away at the polls if you don't show up.

[New York Times]

WATCH MORE: Tech News


Comments

    Alternatively, it had little impact and enough people got sucked in by Trump, or hated Clinton.

      But they didn't, that's the thing. Clinton got 3 million more votes than Trump.

        Elections aren't a simple majority. The US system is particularly odd in regards to this with its electoral college system. It also isn't the first time a president didn't win on popular vote alone (the last was in 2000). None of that suggests foreign influence - just that Trump was able to swing enough voters his way (particularly in the rust belt and rural areas, where Clinton showed little interest) to win the election.

          Which is why America, at least the election of the president, isn't a democracy.

          By definition, in a democracy, each vote has the same value. If someone can win with 3 million fewer votes, those 3 million voters votes are less valuable than the others.

    Adam, I think you missed the Roswell and Illuminati links...

      i love the fact that the Russians had such a deep understanding of the voters that they knew beforehand which few small counties it needed to hack to swing the nation, yet all opinion polls couldn't even suggest a results in a near ballpark.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now