Google Won’t Alter The Holocaust-Denying Results For ‘Did The Holocaust Happen’

Google Won’t Alter The Holocaust-Denying Results For ‘Did The Holocaust Happen’

If you Google “did the Holocaust happen” the first result is a link from Stormfront.org, a neo-Nazi and white supremacist forum that’s widely regarded as the internet’s “first major hate site”.

Shoes taken from Jewish prisoners at Auschwitz via Getty | Screenshot via Google

That’s troubling for sure, but Google’s response was far more concerning. Google told Fortune that the company is “saddened to see that hate organisations still exist”, but it does “not remove content from [its] search results, except in very limited cases such as illegal content, malware and violations of our webmaster guidelines”. The Google spokesperson made sure to add, “The fact that hate sites appear in Search results does not mean that Google endorses these views.”

Titled “Top 10 reasons why the holocaust didn’t happen”, the first post on the forum asks other Stormfront members to help the original poster come up with reasons the Holocaust did not happen so he can “give a good argument”. People on the message board claim things like “no tons of human remains were ever found” and “Auswitcz [sic] was a place where synthentic rubber was being produced and U.S. intelligence was focused on Auswitcz for that reason. No U.S. intelligence reports ever gave any indication of gassing or mass extermination”. For the record, this is all garbage. The Holocaust happened.

In an era where misinformation runs rampant online, Google’s refusal to alter these search results is distressing, though not unexpected. (Facebook has been experiencing similar issues!) In Steven Levy’s history of Google, In the Plex, he recounts when Sergey Brin’s struggle with a similar issue in 2004. He called altering the results “bad technology practice”. But what happens when an uneducated person tries to look up facts and Google sucks them into an online forum spouting conspiracy theories?

Google is a vehicle through which people get information. Does the company have some responsibility to promote the correct information? While Google might not want to mess with the search results for “did the Holocaust happen”, a FTC investigation published in 2015 by the Wall Street Journal revealed that Google “manipulated search results to favour its own services over rivals’, even when they weren’t most relevant for users”.

While the authors of the FTC report did not recommend taking legal action at the time, Google might soon again find itself in hot water. In May of this year, Politico reported the FTC might be reopening its antitrust investigation because of concerns about “Google’s dealings over Android.”

Since Google seems cool with altering its search results to benefit the company, surely it can also demote the ranking of a hateful website that promotes lies.

[Fortune]


The Cheapest NBN 50 Plans

It’s the most popular NBN speed in Australia for a reason. Here are the cheapest plans available.

At Gizmodo, we independently select and write about stuff we love and think you'll like too. We have affiliate and advertising partnerships, which means we may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page. BTW – prices are accurate and items in stock at the time of posting.