Home 3D Printing 'Just Not There Yet' Admits MakerBot

MakerBot was going to change the world. It was going to bring 3D-printing, long a product limited to designer offices and workshops, into the home (or at least the garage). But earlier today, under a veil of marketing speak and glitzy videos, the company announced a new focus on commercial -- not consumer -- products, and in so doing, finally admitted what we've all known for a while. No one really wants a 3D printer in their house. Images: Makerbot

CEO Jonathan Jaglom called MakerBot's event an "an overall repositioning" for the brand. That's a market savvy way of saying MakerBot is abandoning the home and hobbyist and embracing offices and schools. Later, when I asked about MakerBot's former dream of getting 3D printers into people's homes Jaglom's answer seemed to come easily: The consumer market's "just not there yet".

That's a far cry from just a few years ago, when 3D printing seemed on the cusp of something wonderful. It was going to build half your house and maybe your car too. Coverage was breathless, Kickstarters were plentiful and every nerd's desk had some kind of PLA-made monstrosity sitting proudly next to a Game of Thrones FunkoPop.

But the 3D home printer market has quietly crashed in the intervening years -- brought down by extremely low-quality print materials, a painfully long and difficult print process and, worst of all, a complete lack of interest from the general public. The technology's most stalwart proponent, MakerBot, who Wired once hailed as a major cog in the machine of "the next industrial revolution", has even been forced to repeatedly cut down on staff.

The company has also recently experienced a succession of fleeting CEOs, each with a different plan that was ultimately unsuccessful. In 2013, just five years after founding the company, former CEO Bre Pettis left. His departure coincided with MakerBot being acquired by the commercial 3D-printing focused Stratasys. Pettis was replaced by Jenny Lawton and she was in turn replaced in 2015 by current CEO Jonathan Jaglom.

A row of the new MakerBot Replicator Mini Plus.

Makerbot's press conference today was low-key, and the first major product announcement since the pragmatic Jaglom signed on.

And his new direction for the company borrows heavily from his parent company's playbook. Forget the consumer and go after the commercial. MakerBot's new printers, the professional-focused $US2000 ($2649) MakerBot Replicator Plus and the educator-focused $US1000 ($1325) MakerBot Replicator Mini Plus, are smart steps forward for affordable 3D printing. They're quieter, faster and MakerBot has redesigned the software to supposedly make it relatively simple to print.

But you still have to have a basic understanding of 3D design and CAD files to get started with the pricier Plus, and the Mini Plus will be leaning on resources built by and produced for teachers to make it a viable investment. For the consumer still clinging to MakerBot's abandoned dream, there's little hope. Remember MakerBot's populist Thingerverse? It's increasingly seeming like a thing of the past.

Mark Palmer, Head of Experience Design at MakerBot admitted MakerBot was "a little guilty" of forging that dream. But just as quickly as he admitted MakerBot's failure he pointed to the company's new efforts as a necessary step towards moving the technology forward. "That's the future," he said. "These are the avenues to advance."

And maybe Palmer is right. The earliest and messiest and most exciting computers weren't shipped into homes. They were found in offices and schools. We cut our teeth on finicky tech and then brought it back into the home when it stopped being a chore. One day the 3D printer will stop being a chore. MakerBot might get another crack at our homes.

The new MakerBot Replicator Plus.



    Perhaps if the entry price was sub$1000 for a good reliable printer from makerbot, the home 3d printing market would open to them

    what a thoroughly depressing article. i love my 3d printer.

    No one really wants a 3D printer in their house.
    Speak for yourself. I'd love to have one.

      So much this. The only reason I don't own one is the cost is still prohibitive and the print quality isn't really good enough for the sorts of things I'd want to do with it, though if the things were a lot cheaper I'd feel less worried about the low quality.

    Rapid prototyping is just that. Making prototypes quickly (relative term) with no tooling costs.

    They aren't really that suitable for making finished consumer items, for largescale manufacturing of simple items injection moulding, rotomoulding and diecasting is where it is at. (even CNC machining is still best used for simple things (often very small/fine details) and impossible to manufacture with alternative means which have a requirement for high precision. Where precision is not required, there are more efficient ways to make things than cutting metal.

    Highly complex (practically prototypes in each case) limited production items, where there is no alternative means of manufacturing a part, is perfectly suited for one of the many variations on the theme of Additive manufacture. NB. For metal parts, the most likely to succeed in the long term are laser deposition CNC milling machines where add and subtract can be performed on one coordinate system.

    Last edited 21/09/16 10:24 pm

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now