Apparently It’s Australia’s Fault East Asia Has An Emissions Problem

Apparently It’s Australia’s Fault East Asia Has An Emissions Problem

Much of the influence that sulphate and black carbon aerosol emissions from East Asia have on the climate is actually driven by consumption in developed countries (New Zealand and Australia, specifically) rather than in East Asia itself, international scientists say.

A recent study shows that international trade shifts the climate impacts of aerosol emissions — known as radiative forcing — from net consuming countries to net producing countries.

Unlike greenhouse gases, aerosols (such as sulfate or black carbon) emitted through industrial processes or fossil fuel combustion typically only remain in the atmosphere for a short time (days to weeks). As a result, their influence on climate is usually strongest in the region around the source of their emission.

Previous studies have demonstrated the role that international trade has in redistributing greenhouse gases and other pollutant emissions and in altering regional air quality, but the effects on climate forcing due to aerosols is unclear.

Jintai Lin, Qiang Zhang, Yi Huang and colleagues estimated aerosol emissions related to the production and consumption of goods and services for 11 global regions and then compared the influence that the production-related aerosols and consumption-related aerosols have on the global climate and the climate of those regions.

They found that, as East Asia is a large net exporter of emissions-intensive goods, radiative forcing due to the production of goods in the region is much stronger than the radiative forcing related to the consumption of goods.

However, for net importing regions, such as western Europe, North America and Oceania OECD (Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand), they found the opposite is true: radiative forcing related to consumption is much greater than production-related forcing.

Policymakers in countries that are net exporters of emissions-intensive goods could consider whether some of the costs of more stringent local environmental regulations can be passed on to consumers in net importing regions, the researchers suggest.