This Ridiculous Ramp Is SF's Best Idea For A Bike Path Across The Entire Bay Bridge

This Ridiculous Ramp Is SF's Best Idea for a Bike Path Across the Entire Bay Bridge

After the Super Bowl leaves town, San Francisco can stop vandalising corporate statues and go back to focusing on more important projects, like imagining the day the Bay Bridge bike path might finally cross the entire San Francisco Bay. A new bike and pedestrian path opened along the reconstructed Bay Bridge in 2014, but residents are rightly dismayed that the path stops mid-span, forcing riders to simply roll back to Oakland. An extension will take the path to Yerba Buena Island as soon as this winter, but it will take another $US300 million and possibly ten more years to get cyclists all the way to San Francisco.

This Ridiculous Ramp Is SF's Best Idea for a Bike Path Across the Entire Bay Bridge

But still, a city can dream, right? New concepts for the path have been presented by engineers at Arup and it's not an easy proposition. As you can see from the proposed schemes above, the bridge enters the city high above street level, requiring access via either an insanely long ramp or a series of bike elevators. That's actually not that radical; there's precedent in this project which was just approved in Copenhagen.

This Ridiculous Ramp Is SF's Best Idea for a Bike Path Across the Entire Bay Bridge

But... but... the design is really only part of the challenge. The biggest problem, structurally, is essentially stapling an extra lane onto the bridge, which requires affixing old steel to new steel (not ideal, from an engineering perspective). And then all that weight will cause the bridge to sink a little, so it will need to be ratcheted up a bit by the cables.

This Ridiculous Ramp Is SF's Best Idea for a Bike Path Across the Entire Bay Bridge

A much more chill descent is envisioned near Essex Street

As you ponder the completely perplexing thought that this city approved a bridge which only serves vehicles -- Portland has a bridge with no private cars allowed at all -- consider my idea for how San Francisco might be able to save itself ten years and $US300 million.

Remember that the arrival of autonomous vehicles will require about an 80 per cent reduction in real estate dedicated to roads. So by the time this project would be finished, cars will only need half the lanes and there would be absolutely no reason to widen the bridge at all. The city should start by safely cordoning off and dedicating one lane of the bridge's vehicular traffic to bikes in either direction (not unlike a road diet), which will encourage bike ridership and get people out of their cars. By 2025, autonomous cars will be here, only requiring two lanes to safely ferry all passengers, and saving the rest of the bridge for walkers and bikers. No extra bike path required.

This idea has already gained momentum in San Francisco, apparently:

[KQED h/t Christopher Simmons]

Images via Arup



    While autonomous cars in the mix may reduce some traffic. It won't be "magic.
    [If the idea of corporate ownership (and is legally enforced) takes over, parking infrastructure may be minimised but not so much for roadways].

    Peak hour is a byproduct of the working day. Most people start and stop work within a couple of hours of each other, there will still bee congestion on the roads unless light rail and other mass transit methods become more popular, cycling isn't even a congestion reducing mode of transport, it is just a more healthy and less emitting (at point of use) pastime.

    We need to rethink the idea of "going to work". Rather maybe we should "live on the job" or within walking distance, or work from "home" or some other innovative means to encourage productivity whilst living within our personal and societal, financial and environmental means.

    I often thought that in Melbourne, long ramps going out and to the city would be ideal for push bikes people. It would keep them off the roads and they could basically free wheel all the way to the city or back out from the city. Melbourne is extremely flat so you would only need the ramp to be 25 metres at its highest point. Oh, and they should be covered to keep out the wind and rain.

Join the discussion!