AMD Radeon R9 295X2 Graphics Card: Australian Review

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 Graphics Card: Australian Review


[clear]
Gamers want power. Whether it’s a faster CPU, better timings on RAM or the instantaneous flash memory of a SSD, the quicker the better — and damn the price tag. That win-by-any-means ethos applies squarely to graphics technology, too — and there’s a new GPU on the block that wants your hard-earned dollars. According to AMD, the $1899 Radeon R9 295X2 is the fastest single-slot graphics card on the market today.

I tested the Radeon R9 295X2 with the help of Samsung, who generously provided a Series 8 Business Monitor for me to use as a long-term loan, as the basis of Gizmodo’s PC test platform.

The Radeon R9 295X2 is the latest in AMD’s graphics line-up, and it’s the first official dual-GPU card since Radeon 7990 launched last year. It packs in two Radeon R290X graphics processors, each running at a slightly-boosted 1018MHz (over the 290X’s 1000MHz), with a total of 8GB of 5GHz GDDR5 memory providing plenty of temporary high-speed texture and graphics asset caching.

Designed to be used for gaming with a 4K monitor or quadruple-headed Full HD screen setup, it’s so powerful — and consumes so much energy — that it needs external cooling; an onboard fan just wouldn’t be enough to keep the 295X2 from overheating. It has an onboard fan, of course, but the real heavy lifting is done by the twin watercooling blocks and external radiator.



dirty bomb

The integrated cooling solution is one of the most impressive parts of the Radeon 295X2’s kit. With two Asetek 740GN watercooling blocks chained in series, pumping coolant through a 120mm radiator with a single 120mm fan mounted, the 295X2’s cooling can easily keep up with the 500 Watts of power consumed and output as heat by the card at full load. There’s no question that this is a particularly bulky cooling system on an already excessively long graphics card — it barely fit in my standard-size, mid-tower Antec Solo II.


I benchmarked the Radeon R9 295X2 on an Intel Core i7 system with the following specifications:

Gizmodo Test Bench: Specifications

CPU: Intel Core i7-3770
Motherboard: ASUS Maximus V Extreme
Storage: 1x 256GB Sandisk Extreme II SSD, 1x 1TB Western Digital WD Black
RAM: 16GB (4x 4GB) Samsung 1600MHz DDR3 RAM
PSU: Antec AX1200 Gold, 1200W
Enclosure: Antec Solo II
Cooling: Noctua NH-D14 CPU cooler, 3x Fractal Design ‘Silent Series’ 120mm case fans

With all that kit inside, this was one seriously heavy PC. And it was seriously powerful, too — the benchmark results in Tomb Raider, Metro: Last Light, Battlefield 4 and Crysis 3 were far and away more impressive and higher than anything I’ve ever seen before. For gaming at 1080P, 1440P, or even with multiple monitors at these resolutions, the Radeon R9 295X2 is capable no matter the gaming title. Here are the average frame rate results we recorded, using AMD’s Catalyst 14.4 Beta drivers:

AMD Radeon R9 295X2: Average Frame Rates

Battlefield 4 (Ultra): 1080P: 78FPS 1440P: 69FPS
Crysis 3 (Very High): 1080P: 99FPS 1440P: 87FPS
Metro: Last Light (Very High): 1080P: 62FPS 1440P: 50FPS
Tomb Raider (Ultimate + TressFX): 1080P: 147FPS 1440P: 103FPS

How we benchmark: On our test system, we use a combination of current real-world gaming performance benchmarks at 1920×1080 and 2560×1440 resolutions, and synthetic performance tests using Futuremark’s 3D Mark Fire Strike. All tests are run three times in series to produce an average result representative of expected everyday performance, accounting for any possible heat-related speed throttling due to insufficient component cooling.

The Radeon R9 295X2 also decimated every synthetic benchmark we threw at it. 3D Mark Fire Strike Extreme, for example, returned a result of 8352, a huge improvement over the sub-3000 scores of the GeForce GTX 670 usually sitting inside the testbench. In 3D Mark Fire Strike Performance, the GTX 670’s sub-6000 scores were far and away bested by the Radeon 295X2’s 14107 benchmark average. The GTX 670 is just reaching the end of its usable lifespan for playing current games at maximum quality and at 2560×1440 — it’s still reasonably capable — so this should show you just how powerful the 295X2 is.



Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan Z

What is most impressive about the R9 295X2 is how consistently quiet it runs at full power. It might not be the quietest system when it’s simply sitting idle, but it doesn’t get much louder even when you’re pushing it hard. The closed-loop liquid cooling system may have a relatively small radiator cross-section and only a single 120mm fan (although a second can be mounted in a push-pull configuration), but even during its third consescutive Crysis 3 benchmark, the card only had a barely noticeable raise in the audible volume of its onboard and radiator cooling fans.

Because the liquid cooling radiator is designed to be mounted in the place of a case fan, it’s closer to the outside of your PC — giving it an advantage in receiving fresh, cool air for cooling, but also making its mounted fan more audible. As a side effect, though, we did notice the increased power draw leading to our Corsair PSU’s fan speed increasing under load. So if you’re running the R9 295X and playing some seriously intensive gaming titles, your PC will get louder, but it’s not directly because of the graphics card.



definitely

The AMD Radeon R9 295X2, in all its $2000, metal-suitcase-bundled, 500-Watt power-sucking, benchmark-destroying glory will be available in Australia from the end of April, with stockists (and the amount of stock available) still to be confirmed. I don’t imagine AMD will have too many orders for it, but in its own way, it’s actually surprisingly good value.