NATO-Commissioned Report Says Killing Hackers Is Basically OK

NATO-Commissioned Report Says Killing Hackers Is Basically OK

Cyberwarfare is all well and civilised when it’s confined to a tit-for-tat hacking of banks, but it’s got the potential to spiral out of control really fast. To try and prevent that, and save the world from a hacked-WoW-account-induced apocalypse, NATO has comissioned a set of international laws to try to make cyberwarfare more… civilised.

Despite how it might seem, war’s actually relatively civilised. Agreements like the Geneva Conventions and Ottowa Treaty lay down laws as to how warfare should be conducted — be nice to your prisoners and no blowing people up with landmines, for example — and the UN charter explains when war might be justified. But none of those were written with cyberwarfare in mind, which is difficult when the Americans are going round hacking the Iranians, the Koreans are hacking each other, and China’s just hacking everyone.

In an attempt to make some sense of the mess, NATO (basically the Western powers-that-be) commissioned a report from a bunch of legal experts at the ‘NATO Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence’ to suggest some rules for cyberwarfare. Well, the report’s in, and the suggestions are kinda surprising.

Basically, cyber attacks which cause “physical damage, injury or death” constitute a ‘use of force’, and thus can be retaliated to with real physical weapons. Equally surprising is the classification of civilian hacktivists as legitimate targets during war.

For those of us who aren’t looking forward to WWIII though, there is some good news. As with conventional warfare, there’s a list of targets that’s off-limits for cyber-warfare, including things like hospitals and nuclear power plants (oops, USA/Israel). Additionally, an attack originating in a country doesn’t constitute proof for retaliation — there has to be proper evidence that the attack is the actual work of a government.

It’s worth noting that these proposals aren’t law — yet. At the moment, it’s just a set of suggestions, but given the work that’s gone into it, and the lack of sensible alternatives, something tells me that these ‘suggestions’ might get the global thumbs-up soon. [CCDCOE via The Guardian]


Gizmodo UK is gobbling up the news in a different timezone, so check them out if you need another Giz fix. [clear]