The Best Bluetooth Headphones For Less Than $600

The technology driving wireless headphones has not yet reached its full potential. But over the past few years, Bluetooth has advanced to a point that less than $600 can buy a pair of headphones with decent audio and respectable battery life. We rounded up four pairs and let 'em duke it out to see if any pair has stamina and sound you could truly call excellent.

Testing Methodology

We tested four Bluetooth headphones, each with a retail price tag in Australia under $600, to find out which one can deliver the best sounding audio. We factored in aspects such as controls, build quality, size and noise cancelling. But audio fidelity was by far the thing we cared about most.

The purpose of this test was to see which pair could come closest to replacing your home headphones. Truth be told, none are better than a good pair of wired cans — they all still suffer from background hiss, they're pricey, and each has a particular, nagging flaw. But the appeal of being untethered from a stereo, laptop or media player is undeniable. Walking from the kitchen to the living room listening to loud music at 2am is simply great.

For this test, we used an iPhone and MacBook Pro with an array of 320kbps MP3 files spanning multiple genres. In addition to listening for clarity across lows, mids and highs, we paid attention to the fidelity of the Bluetooth connection, battery life, ease of use and comfort. All the products more or less performed as advertised on the battery test, and functioned fine within a 8m radius (including transmitting through walls). But enough with the general info, let's talk specifics.

4th Place: Beats Wireless

Retailing for around $370, Beats Wireless headphones have the distinction of being the cheapest headphones in this shootout, but they also look and sound like it. Bass response is heavier than normal, but it sounds good, as expected. Mids and highs, however, are a bit muddy and dark, as if those frequencies are behind a veil. This makes for a fairly confined soundstage overall. Combined with the plasticky build quality, this is a headphone you'll only want if you're on somewhat of a budget. Or if you really want a Beats logo on your head.

Beats Wireless • Bluetooth: version 2.1, Apt-X • Noise Cancelling: No • Weight: 210g • Line In: yes • Battery: 10 hours • Price: $369.95 RRP in Australia

3rd Place: Logitech UE 9000

The Ultimate Ears 9000 are the headphones for someone who want a wireless headphone with Beats Audio-style bass, along with respectable sound quality. This audio is clearer than that of the Beats Wireless, but it still lacks some of the imaging and high-end frequency detail the two best pairs have. The Logitech also suffers from choppy audio a bit more often than the others. That said, this model probably has the most solid construction of all the headphones, and the pair is pretty damn comfortable. The cans are also the bulkiest and heaviest, making them somewhat less portable (and more likely to cause a bit of fatigue if worn for extended periods of time).

Logitech UE 9000 • Bluetooth: version 2.1, EDR • Noise Cancelling: yes • Weight: 330g • Line In: yes • Battery: 10 hours • Price: $599.95 RRP in Australia

2nd Place: Sennheiser MM 550-X

The Sennheiser MM 550-Xs were actually the best-sounding headphones of the bunch. The depth of the soundstage and details that came through over the Bluetooth connection was downright surprising. Sure, there's still that faint background hiss, present as a result of the inevitable compression going on. But with a more neutral response curve, these would be the audiophile's pick for Bluetooth headphones (if an audiophile ever actually desired such a thing). There's just one pesky flaw: These things don't get very loud.

At their loudest level — with both your phone and the headphones maxed out — it only seems slightly louder than normal. And not that you necessarily need audio blaring at a million decibels to enjoy it, but sometimes its nice to blast your music. Sadly, you won't be doing that with these.

The MM 550-Xs are the lightest and most portable pair tested. They're also ugly as sin. Add in the fact that they were one of the most expensive, retailing for around the $600 mark, and it's hard to recommend these as the best Bluetooth headphones overall.

Sennheiser MM 550-X • Bluetooth: version 2.1, EDR, Apt-X • Noise Cancelling: yes • Weight: 179g • Line In: yes • Battery: 10 hours • Price: $600 RRP in Australia

BESTMODO!!! Parrot Zik Headphones

Parrot has never struck anyone as a serious audio company. Sure, it makes plenty of accessories. But the nuances of audio quality as they pertain to music have never come across as Parrot's primary concern. So it's something of a surprise that the Zik headphones are as good as they are. Not just good for Parrot, but good, period. They're not quite on par with Sennheiser's offering, but they come close enough that it makes the pair's benefits too tough to turn down.

Even with the Phillipe Starck flashiness (which can singlehandedly ruin things sometimes), the Ziks are the best looking headphones in this battlemodo. Plus, there's the capacitive touch panel on the right ear, which allows you to control playback with gestures. The NFC capabilities allow you to automagically pair with compatible Android phones, and a sensor stops playback whenever you take your headphones off. All of this adds up to an unrivalled user experience.

There is, however, one extremely annoying flaw. The headphones ship by default with noise-cancelling, DSP effects, and an artificial EQ turned on. The only way to turn that stuff off is through an iOS or Android app. If you purchase the Zik's for use solely with your computer, there's no way to change these settings. For those without such a device, this hangup negate the entire appeal of the headphones. Even if you have the hardware, it's an inconvenience. Still though, this is an issue you might be able to overlook. If that's the case, then these are the best Bluetooth headphones for under $600.">Parrot Zik • Bluetooth: version 2.1 • Noise Cancelling: yes • Weight: 325g • Line In: Yes • Battery: 6-10 hours • Price: $499 RRP in Australia


    I'd never spend anything close to $600 on a set of headphones, bluetooth or not.

      Have to agree with this.
      The most I will spend is $300 for a pair of the sweet AiAiAi TMA-1s.
      And even that is a stretch and not likely to happen any time soon.

    I'd appreciate if Giz could do a review of wireless headphones under, say, $200.

    I think more of us are likely to spend a lot less than $600 on headphones.

    Adrian, you are wrong about the noise cancelling feature on the Zik's. I use them with my home theatre and I just linked them to my iPhone first and turned off the noise cancelling then disconnected it an dconnected it to my home theatre and they work like a charm without the noise cancelling and have been for a week or so.
    The only think that sucks about them is the noise cancelling feature makes me want to vomit. Is there a way to overcome that?

    Don't Nokia make Noise cancelling Bluetooth headphones for like $300?

      They used to, go back about 10 years ago and they had fantastic bluetooth stereo headphones that you can buy - they had the best bass in the business back then.

      However a check of the Nokia website reveals that the only headphones Nokia sell are the Purity HD, co-branded with monster - these are wired, not bluetooth.

      PS - i'd also like to see an article on budget bluetooth headphones

        Found em', these tackers -

      I have a pair of Nokia BH-905 headphones which came in a bundle-deal with my Nokia N900 a few years ago.. The phone may have cracked last may, but the headphones are still going strong and sound really good. Very functional, good quality, extremely comfortable for long periods and these days can be had around $250 I think.

      Good chance they are superseded however. Also you tend to look a bit like a Cyber-man :-)

    Uhmmmm.. To be honest.. the title of this article alone made me laugh :)

    "But over the past few years, Bluetooth has advanced to a point that less than $600 ...."

    And,,,? $600 isn't peanuts.. nor is $370..

    What's next...?

    The best (goes off and finds the best GPU within a reasonable margin) Graphics Cards less than ($1 more than the one I selected)..

    Really bad article and completely out of touch.

    You've not even listed the full specs of each headphone.. the first thing I look at is not what version of bluetooth it is supporting or whether it has noise cancellation... what about the frequency response?? Impedance?? Sensitivty? Harmonic distortion and so on.. for these prices, this kind of information is kind of important... don't you think? Or maybe that's the problem.. you didn't really think.

    Re: the suggestions for a budget bluetooth article, it's worth noting that a certain competitor's roundup didn't have anything about $120, accepting that they would be US prices:

    /me would be surprised if this comment is not deleted.

    I thought Bluetooth audio was by definition lousy. I'm therefore confused by these expensive headphones (tho' cheapies would be sensible, as they would sound bad even if wired). Anyone care top explain what is going on here? Is this just a case of "a sucker born every minute"?

    I'm currently using a set of Bluetooth headphone from Philips, which cost $90.

    They are surprisingly good, though not audiophile quality, for sure.

    Spend less than $200 on a pair of Etymotic IEM's and keep your phone in your pocket; the performance would shame these headphones.

    I use motorola S805 and S705. S805 are stand alone "DJ style", where about $160 is Australia. 705 are designed to use with any headphones via a "badge", a Bluetooth "convertor" with a mike. Features are about the same on both. They both suffer from a little subtle noise, but after trying many Bluetooth headphones out these are the two I have settled on. Sadly, both are discontinued , though some stores have stock of the 705!

    There are a surprising number of whingey proud cheapskates ready to offer an opinion. Good research, conducted well enough and provided at a price even the disinterested can afford. I appreciate it and it will go in the mix for my Bluetooth headphones purchase. I never heard of your winner before. Useful.

    i'v got JBL 610 ref <3 and i love it, and wanna change off Her for something Parrot :D

    i would personally also add

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now