Seinfeld excelled at criticism of the everyday. A few months ago, Sam Anderson suggested that Roland Barthes was the father of pop cultural criticism and that we are all now cultural critics in the Barthian vein, “decoding everything”. Perhaps. But if Barthes gave us serious criticism of popular culture, Seinfeld taught us to be ironic critics of the utterly mundane. Case in point: toilet paper.
Consider this exchange from“The Face Painter”episode:
George: Take toilet paper for example. Do you realise that toilet paper has
not changed in my lifetime? It’s just paper on a cardboard roll, that’s it.
And in 10 thousand years, it will still be exactly the same because really,
what else can they do?
Siena: That’s true. There really has been no development in toilet paper.
George: And everything else has changed. But toilet paper is exactly the same,
and will be so until we’re dead.
Siena: Yeah, you’re right George. What else can they do?
George: It’s just paper on a roll, that’s it. And that’s all it will ever be.
Now stick with me. I know you’re probably wondering why I’m writing about toilet paper, but there is a point here. George reminds us that ubiquitous technologies tend to become naturalised (reified if you prefer) and veil their very contingent history. In other words, there has been development in toilet paper as Jerry points out later in the episode:
George: I saw Siena again.
Jerry: Yeah, he’s dating a crayon.
George: We discussed toilet paper.
Jerry: Toilet paper?
George: Yeah, I told her how toilet paper hasn’t changed in my lifetime, and
probably wouldn’t change in the next 50 thousand years and she was
Jerry: What are you talking about?
Jerry: Toilet paper’s changed.
Jerry: It’s softer.
Jerry: More sheets per roll
Jerry: Comes in a wide variety of colours.
George: Ok, ok, fine! It’s changed, it’s not really the point. Anyway, I’m
thinking of making a big move.
Toilet paper, in case you’re wondering, was in use in China as early as the fourteenth century and it was made in 2-inch x 3-inch sheets. Everywhere else, and in China before then, people made use of what their environment offered. Leaves, mussel shells, corncobs were among the more common options. The Romans (what have they ever done for us!) used a sponge attached to the end of a stick and dipped in salt water. And yes, as you may have heard, in certain cultures the left hand was employed in the task of scatological hygiene, and in these cultures the left hand retains a certain stigma to this day.
Until the late 19th century, the West opted for discarded reading material. It’s not clear if this is why Americans still today often take reading material into the bathroom, or if the practice of reading on the toilet yielded a eureka moment subsequently. In any case, magazines, newspapers and almanacs were all precursors to the toilet paper as we know it today. It has been claimed that the Sears and Roebuck catalogue was also known as the “Rears and Sorebutt” catalogue. The Farmer’s Almanac even came with a hole punched in it so that it could be hung and the pages torn off with ease.
Toilet paper in its present form first appeared in 1857 thanks toJoseph Gayetty. It was thoughtfully moistened with aloe.In 1879, the Scott Paper Company was founded by brothers Edward and Clarence Scott. They sold toilet paper in an unperforatedroll. By 1885, perforated rolls were being sold byAlbany Perforated Wrapping Paper Company.
In 1935, Northern Tissue advertised its toilet paper to be “splinter-free”. Apparently, early production techniques managed to embed splinters in the paper. Three cheers for innovation! And finally, in 1942, two-ply toilet paper was introduced in St. Andrew’s Paper Mill in the UK. An odd development considering wartime austerity and rationing. Speaking of rationing, the Virtual Toilet Paper Museum(you’re learning all sorts of things in this post) reports that the first toilet paper shortage in the US took place in 1973. Presumably, it was overshadowed by the oil embargo.
The point is that all technology has a history and that what we now take to be innovative and revolutionary will one day become ordinary and commonplace. This, of course, borders on cliche. The key, however, is to remember that before any technology became a naturalized and taken-for-granted part of society there were choices to be made. Forgetting that technology has a history is a way of refusing responsibility.
Michael Sacasas is pursuing a PhD in the University of Central Florida’s “Texts & Technology” program. He blogs on technology and culture at thefrailestthing.com and you can follow him on Twitter at @FrailestThing