Microbial fuel cells may well be the next black (or at least brown) gold. But to tap those anaerobic reserves, we’ll need a power station that can run on carbon-rich gas. Something like the DFC-3000 fuel cell — it turns biogas into power 2200 for homes and their hydrogen cars.
Welsh Physicist William Grove patented the first fuel cells back in 1839. A fuel cell is composed of an electrolyte sandwiched between a fuel source (something to produce hydrogen) and an oxidant. The cell oxidizes the fuel at the anode and draws electrons to the cathode via an external circuit. When the electrons reach the cathode, they recombine with the hydrogen and push ions across the electrolyte and complete the circuit while producing carbon dioxide, water and a few other trace chemicals.
Since these cells are self-contained generators with few moving parts capable of operating without combustion, they are ideally suited for remote areas that are otherwise inaccessible to main power grids or for on-site power for large institutions like hospitals, universities, and utilities. NASA has even employed fuel cells in numerous probes and satellites.
The MCFC needs to achieve temperatures in excess of 650C in order to melt the carbonate salt. This makes MCFCs less than ideal for mobile power generation — it takes too long for the cells to heat up — but does impart a few benefits.
First, the extremely high operating temperature means that the machines can use electrodes made of non-precious metals, making them cheaper to produce. Second, these cells are able to extract hydrogen directly from the fuel source, a process known as internal reforming. This is something lower temperature cells cannot accomplish, which also reduces cost.
Third, they’re not prone to electrode poisoning, aka “carbon choking”, wherein carbon and other impurities build up on the electrodes like plaque, reducing their efficiency. This increases the variety of fuels MCFCs can use, including natural gas, bio-gas, even coal gas and other carbon-heavy sources.
Finally, the MCFCs are more efficient than other fuel cell technologies and many fossil fuels. MCFCs achieve an electrical efficiency of up to 60 per cent — compared to 37-42 per cent efficiency of conventional phosphoric acid fuel cell plants. And when combined with cogeneration technology, capturing and reusing the MCFC’s waste heat, electrical efficiency can approach 90 per cent.
The MCFC’s main disadvantage is its durability. Due to the high operating temperature and corrosive materials employed, MCFCs tend to break down faster than other fuel cell technologies. Their other fault is that the process of internal reforming also produces greenhouse gas CO2 as a by-product, though it often isn’t much.
It consumes 360scf of natural gas every minute and expels 445kg of CO2 per MWh. Compared to other forms of power generation, that’s fantastic — coal plants generate 1020kg/MWh on average, oil produces 758kg/MWh, and natural gas produces about 514kg/MWh. And with cogeneration, it only expels about 272kg/MWh, half of the next cleanest fuel source.
The DFC taps into anaerobic processing tanks at the waste water treatment facility for its fuel — the gas would be flared off otherwise. Using the biogas, the DFC generates electricity that runs the rest of the treatment facility but, because the process doesn’t fully reintegrate the hydrogen, there’s always a bit left over. This excess gas is then used to a a renewable fuel source for the hydrogen-powered cars. Thank you, bacterial waste. [FuelCell Energy 1, 2, 3 – MCFC Wiki – DFC Wiki – Cogeneration Wiki – Global Newswire]