The Digital Cameras Of 2000 Look Awfully Good For Their Age

The Digital Cameras Of 2000 Look Awfully Good For Their Age
Facebook may have decided that you shouldn’t see the news, but we think you deserve to be in the know with Gizmodo Australia’s reporting. To sign up for our daily newsletter covering the latest news, features and reviews, head HERE. For a running feed of all our stories, follow us on Twitter HERE. Or you can bookmark the Gizmodo Australia homepage to visit whenever you need a news fix.

This Canon PowerShot G1, released in 2000, has held up well. Sure, 3.34 megapixels isn’t much, but spec for spec, this codger can almost hang with the kids.

Seriously, you could just post this spec sheet next to a Canon in a retail store now, and most people wouldn’t bat an eye. They sure as hell wouldn’t buy it, they probably wouldn’t say anything, either:

In 10 years, what have we gained? More megapixels, higher-quality video, some more ports, better low-light performance, smaller memory cards, better battery life and a little compactness. Canon’s cheapest P&S, the 10-megapixel Powershot A480, handily outspecs the $US800 G1 for just $200 (though it doesn’t have video).

What’s amazing, though, is that if you did spend $900 on this camera back in 2000, you could still use it today. It’d be beaten to hell, the zoom motor would sound like it had gained sentience and learned to experience real, mammalian pain, and the 16MB CF card would have been replaced with something a little roomier, but damnit, it would work – and your Facebook friends wouldn’t know the difference. You can’t say that about many gadgets from 10 years ago, so here’s to you, Powershot: You were great, or your category moves slow. Whichever makes you feel better.