<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; youtube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>YouTube Shuts Down API Access, Blocks Set-Top Boxes</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/youtube-shuts-down-api-access-leaves-set-top-boxes-high-and-dry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/youtube-shuts-down-api-access-leaves-set-top-boxes-high-and-dry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popcorn hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[set-top boxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syabas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video on demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two ways for a device to access YouTube: either through the regular web interface (i.e. Flash) or for cleaner integration, through its back-end APIs. As of December, Google is shutting off the tap. Update.
The news comes from the COO of Syabas, the company that makes the Popcorn Hour set-top box. Up until now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/youtube_pulldown.jpg" alt="" class="right" />There are two ways for a device to access YouTube: either through the regular web interface (i.e. Flash) or for cleaner integration, through its back-end APIs. As of December, Google is shutting off the tap. <strong>Update.</strong><span id="more-368437"></span></p>
<p>The news comes from the COO of Syabas, the company that makes the Popcorn Hour set-top box. Up until now they&#8217;d had a loose agreement with the &#8216;Tube: They can stream video from YouTube for free, but YouTube can change the terms of the deal whenever they want. Which they did!: </p>
<blockquote><p>YouTube has always retained the right to change its terms of service in the future should it ever wish to do so. As a result of Google&#8217;s decision, Syabas is no longer allowed to access YouTube through its APIs. To be clear, Syabas is not being singled out. With the exception of a few strategic partners Google has chosen to work with, the company has informed Syabas they are asking all over-the-top device makers that are currently connecting to YouTube content through its APIs to take down the service.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> To quote every set-top box manufacturer in the world, probably: &#8220;<em>Shit</em>.&#8221; YouTube access had become the kind of thing you take for granted in a connected box or Blu-ray player, and it was nice to have. Now, it&#8217;ll be limited to devices like the PS3, Wii and TiVo &mdash; backed by the kinds of players who have the clout to pressure Google, or the money to pay them &mdash; leaving everyone else to search for some kind of hacky workaround. </p>
<p>I understand that Google wants to squeeze some ad revenue out of YouTube, and that letting anyone and everyone access raw, ad-free content through the back end probably isn&#8217;t the best business plan, but<em> this isn&#8217;t Hulu</em> &mdash; it&#8217;s not like they have many powerful content providers to appease, just a bunch of teenagers with webcams. Set-top box folks: Watch your free video cornucopia dissolve on December 2. </p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> YouTube&#8217;s statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>Since July of 2008, YouTube&#8217;s Terms of Service has restricted implementations for televisions based on our APIs. YouTube has been in active discussions with various developers on how best to implement YouTube on set top boxes and TVs. There are several companies, however, that have deployed solutions, like video scraping technology, to circumvent the rules and violate YouTube&#8217;s Terms of Service. Companies that have negotiated agreements to use our APIs, like TiVo, Sony, Panasonic and Sony&#8217;s PS3 are not impacted.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, companies like Syabas have been in violation of YouTube&#8217;s terms of service for some time now and knew this was going to happen. The question remains, though: Why couldn&#8217;t they just comply and get a deal like TiVo or Sony? Does it cost anything? Is YouTube selective? Does it just take awhile? [<a href="http://digital.limberis.com/2009/11/wheres-youtube-on-popcorn-hour.html">Syabas</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/20/youtube-pulls-a-hulu-yanking-api-access-from-popcorn-hour-ot/">Engadget</a> via <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/11/youtube-will-soon-block-access-from-set-top-devices/">Lifehacker</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/youtube-shuts-down-api-access-leaves-set-top-boxes-high-and-dry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Adding Automatic Captions To YouTube Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/google-adding-automatic-captions-to-youtube-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/google-adding-automatic-captions-to-youtube-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is bringing its Google Voice speech recognition tech to YouTube, creating automatic captions for deaf and hearing-impaired users. Get ready for hilariously incorrect captions!
 Because the speech-recognition technology is still a work in progress, Google is launching the automatic captioning service on the YouTube channels of just a handful of partners, including PBS, National [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/youtubecaptions.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_youtubecaptions.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Google is bringing its Google Voice speech recognition tech to YouTube, creating automatic captions for deaf and hearing-impaired users. Get ready for hilariously incorrect captions!<span id="more-368381"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> Because the speech-recognition technology is still a work in progress, Google is launching the automatic captioning service on the YouTube channels of just a handful of partners, including PBS, National Geographic and a few big universities. But the company promises that the technology will improve over time — and it hopes for a much broader rollout.</p>
<p>In the meantime, Google is adding a new &#8220;auto-timing&#8221; feature to its existing manual captioning service to make it easier to use. Video creators will now simply have to create a text file with all the words spoken in a video and Google&#8217;s speech recognition technology will take it from there — matching the text to the words as they are spoken. Google hopes this will encourage more users to add captions to their videos.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> [<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hetJ0S2aMJ1_foyMRobfjxkk3evgD9C2PQ981">AP</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/google-adding-automatic-captions-to-youtube-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What If George Lucas Remastered Singin&#8217; In The Rain?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-if-george-lucas-remastered-singin-in-the-rain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-if-george-lucas-remastered-singin-in-the-rain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singing in the rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s worse: the fact that this video seems to be a few years old and I&#8217;ve only just seen it, or the fact that I actually wouldn&#8217;t mind watching a George Lucas remastered version of Singin&#8217; in the Rain. Actually, I think the second one is worse. Much, much worse.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="570" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YeYgju2qopM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YeYgju2qopM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s worse: the fact that this video seems to be a few years old and I&#8217;ve only just seen it, or the fact that I actually wouldn&#8217;t mind watching a George Lucas remastered version of <em>Singin&#8217; in the Rain</em>. Actually, I think the second one is worse. Much, much worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/what-if-george-lucas-remastered-singin-in-the-rain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top YouTube Sport Channels</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/top-youtube-sport-channels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/top-youtube-sport-channels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracey Lien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playing with balls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=357139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Contrary to popular belief, (some) tech-heads are also sports enthusiasts, and where do geeks go for their sports fix? Why, the internet, of course! 
Here are Gizmodo’s top YouTube picks – if you’ve got your own favourites, don&#8217;t keep &#8216;em to yourself &#8211; share them with us in the comments!
Cricket Australia TV
The official YouTube channel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/09/cricket-aus-200x146.jpg" alt="cricket aus" title="cricket aus" width="200" height="146" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-357144" /></p>
<p>Contrary to popular belief, (some) tech-heads are also sports enthusiasts, and where do geeks go for their sports fix? Why, the internet, of course! <span id="more-357139"></span></p>
<p>Here are Gizmodo’s top YouTube picks – if you’ve got your own favourites, don&#8217;t keep &#8216;em to yourself &#8211; share them with us in the comments!</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/cricketaustraliatv">Cricket Australia TV</a></strong><br />
The official YouTube channel for Cricket Australia, the channel offers exclusive interviews with Australia’s finest cricketers, as well as video blogs, and analysis of matches.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/sportsnetwork">Universal Sports Network</a></strong><br />
The YouTube home of World Championship sporting events, the Sports Network showcases the golden moments in sports that have been captured on video – victories, defeat, blunders, and humiliation. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/drivingsports#play/all">Driving Sports TV</a></strong><br />
For lovers of fast cars, DSTV looks into all aspects of the fast and furious sport, featuring interviews with drivers, footage from races, and even exclusives with those who have developed racing car video games.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/TNAwrestling#play/shows">TNA Wrestling</a></strong><br />
Is it still a sport if it’s mostly staged? Yes? No? No? Oh, well, let’s be open-minded and accept Total Nonstop Action Wrestling as a sport, because why not! Watch classic matches, the latest TNA news and match previews, and be the first to view exclusive interviews.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/BigPondNRL2009">BigPond NRL</a></strong><br />
When the gruff and rough is more your kind of thing, you can’t go past the highlights of NRL on the BigPond sports channel. All the best moments from 2009 caught on video and uploaded into the one spot.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/playing-with-balls">Playing with balls</a> is Gizmodo AU’s week-long look at the technology behind the sports we love, from the jerseys to the balls and everything in between. Go the Everton!</em></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200704/r137554_468125.jpg">Pic</a>] ABC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/top-youtube-sport-channels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitler&#8217;s A Gun On Flight Control</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/hitlers-a-gun-on-flight-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/hitlers-a-gun-on-flight-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hitler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=351211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I admit that the whole Hitler subtitle meme has had its day in the sun, but this one had me literally laughing out loud. Is it weird that I actually felt bad for the guy? I mean, it can&#8217;t be easy to lose a top 5 ranking in Flight Control, or the ability to read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bXb8sLeCwYo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bXb8sLeCwYo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
<p>I admit that the whole Hitler subtitle meme has had its day in the sun, but this one had me literally laughing out loud. Is it weird that I actually felt bad for the guy? I mean, it can&#8217;t be easy to lose a top 5 ranking in <em>Flight Control</em>, or the ability to read news on the toilet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/hitlers-a-gun-on-flight-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube To Offer Both Paid And Ad-Supported Movie Rentals?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/youtube-to-offer-both-paid-and-ad-supported-new-release-movie-rentals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/youtube-to-offer-both-paid-and-ad-supported-new-release-movie-rentals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie rentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=351161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal reports that YouTube is deep in discussions with the movie studios to offer both paid (likely $US3.99) and ad-supported movie rentals. This would include new releases, which would be new to YouTube.
Lion&#8217;s Gate, Sony and Warner Bros are all reportedly discussing such a service with Google (who owns YouTube), although details [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/thumb160x_youtube.jpg" alt="" class="left" />The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125192241524880801.html">Wall Street Journal</a> reports that YouTube is deep in discussions with the movie studios to offer both paid (likely $US3.99) and ad-supported movie rentals. This would include new releases, which would be new to YouTube.<span id="more-351161"></span></p>
<p>Lion&#8217;s Gate, Sony and Warner Bros are all reportedly discussing such a service with Google (who owns YouTube), although details are thin. Negotiations are still ongoing, so a lot of major issues are still unresolved: Will downloads be available? Which films would be ad-supported versus a flat fee? What about TV shows? But if YouTube could get a solid, competitive system going, they&#8217;d have a fair chance at competing with Hulu, iTunes and Crackle and maybe even turn a profit one of these days. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125192241524880801.html">WSJ</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/youtube-to-offer-both-paid-and-ad-supported-new-release-movie-rentals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Vs. Analog Storage: How Many VHS Tapes In One iPod?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/digital-vs-analog-storage-how-many-vhs-tapes-one-youtubecom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/digital-vs-analog-storage-how-many-vhs-tapes-one-youtubecom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=349688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozy, in a shrewd plug for their online backup service, have created a chart to show how much data our digital collections can hold compared to old analogue storage. Have you guys heard of the iPod? It looks amazing.
We&#8217;ve seen comparisons like this before and as we move into terabytes of digital storage they&#8217;re less [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/Picture_1_03.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_Picture_1_03.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Mozy, in a shrewd plug for their <a href="http://mozy.com/">online backup service</a>, have created a chart to show how much data our digital collections can hold compared to old analogue storage. Have you guys heard of the iPod? It looks <em>amazing</em>.<span id="more-349688"></span></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen comparisons like this before and as we move into terabytes of digital storage they&#8217;re less and less useful (and interesting). But the move to the cloud is pretty intriguing: Facebook photos, YouTube videos, all that stuff is pretty much unlimited and will continue to grow. [<a href="http://www.mozy.com/blog/misc/physical-storage-vs-digital-storage/">Mozy</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/digital-vs-analog-storage-how-many-vhs-tapes-one-youtubecom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DDOS Attack Was Because Of One Guy&#8217;s Livejournal</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/ddos-attack-against-facebook-twitter-et-al-was-because-of-one-guys-livejournal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/ddos-attack-against-facebook-twitter-et-al-was-because-of-one-guys-livejournal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyxym]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial of service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=344388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a Facebook executive, the target of today&#8217;s DDOS attacks on Twitter, Facebook, Livejournal, YouTube and other social media sites was one pro-Georgian blogger going by the username of &#8220;Cyxym.&#8221; No word as to who was behind the attack.
Earlier today several competing social networks banded together to fight the DDOS attacks on their respective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/livejournal.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/504x_livejournal.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>According to a Facebook executive, the target of today&#8217;s DDOS attacks on Twitter, Facebook, Livejournal, YouTube and other social media sites was one pro-Georgian blogger going by the username of &#8220;Cyxym.&#8221; No word as to who was behind the attack.<span id="more-344388"></span></p>
<p>Earlier today several competing social networks banded together to fight the DDOS attacks on their respective properties. Google and Facebook were able to keep the effects minimal while Twitter and others suffered periodic outages and severe slowness through out the day.</p>
<p>Max Kelly, chief security officer at Facebook, explained that the attack specifically targeted Cyxym, and was directed toward websites which he frequented or on which he held accounts, including his Livejournal, where we find the first suggestion that there was a big target painted on his virtual back:</p>
<blockquote><p> Cyxymu&#8217;s LiveJournal page wasn&#8217;t accessible, but a cached version showed that it was updated on Thursday with a message about the denial of service (DOS) attacks on his accounts on the US-based sites. &#8220;Now it&#8217;s obvious it&#8217;s a special attack against me and Georgians,&#8221; the message in Russian said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> There is no word on exactly who was behind this attack and Kelly declined to speculate. But we wonder: Did Cyxym have a Gizmodo commenter account too or was the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/why-gizmodo-went-down/">DDOS attack on Gawker Media</a> an entirely unrelated coincidence? [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10305200-245.html">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/ddos-attack-against-facebook-twitter-et-al-was-because-of-one-guys-livejournal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Acquires On2, Could Mean Big Things For Online Video</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/google-acquires-on2-could-mean-big-things-for-online-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/google-acquires-on2-could-mean-big-things-for-online-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=344037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has entered into an agreement to acquire On2 and their video compression technology. With YouTube in it&#8217;s back pocket, it seems likely that Google could push this technology all over the web&#8212;giving them even broader control. [BusinessWire]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has entered into an agreement to acquire On2 and their video compression technology. With YouTube in it&#8217;s back pocket, it seems likely that Google could push this technology all over the web&mdash;giving them even broader control. [<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090805005571&amp;newsLang=en">BusinessWire</a>]<span id="more-344037"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/google-acquires-on2-could-mean-big-things-for-online-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Experiments With 3D Video; Supports Multiple Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/youtube-experiments-with-3d-video-supports-multiple-technologies-headaches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/youtube-experiments-with-3d-video-supports-multiple-technologies-headaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d glasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video yt3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube 3d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One cross-eyed Googler has been spending his 20% on a 3D video display system for YouTube, which is open for experimentation/testing/goofing off right now.
It&#8217;s a little rough right now, but it&#8217;s already plenty of fun to play with, at least until your inevitable migraine sets in. The interface lets you switch between a fairly long [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_Picture_169.jpg" alt="" class="left" />One cross-eyed Googler has been spending <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/05/googles-20-percent-time-in-action.html">his 20%</a> on a 3D video display system for YouTube, which is open for experimentation/testing/goofing off right now.<span id="more-342153"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a little rough right now, but it&#8217;s already plenty of fun to play with, at least until your inevitable migraine sets in. The interface lets you switch between a fairly long list of viewing options, be it a particular type of glasses&mdash;red/cyan or amber/blue&mdash;or a simple cross-eyed option, all rendered from a single source file. It&#8217;s incredibly obvious, simply mashing two-panel source video together in a variety of ways, but it&#8217;s a surprisingly elegant way to deal with fragmenting 3D technologies. Details about how to activate and upload for the feature, as well as some samples, are available <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/youtube/thread?tid=56b6f6f15dabf994&amp;hl=en">here</a>. [<a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/020420.html">SERoundTable</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/youtube-experiments-with-3d-video-supports-multiple-technologies-headaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
