<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; x-rays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/x-rays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:24:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>God Of War Smites Human Hand (X-Ray)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/03/god-of-war-smites-human-hand-x-ray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/03/god-of-war-smites-human-hand-x-ray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god of war iii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=388395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally speaking, video games don&#8217;t cause real bodily harm. But this x-ray, sent to us by a physician, proves that God of War III can break actual bones.
I had a patient who was so caught up in playing God of War III that he rolled over his hand with his knee and broke two fingers. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_gowbreaknew.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Generally speaking, video games don&#8217;t cause real bodily harm. But this x-ray, sent to us by a physician, proves that <em>God of War III</em> can break actual bones.<span id="more-388395"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>I had a patient who was so caught up in playing God of War III that he rolled over his hand with his knee and broke two fingers. The radiograph is attached (with his information omitted and arrows that point to the fractures). First time I&#8217;ve seen such an extreme gaming injury.</p></blockquote>
<p>But in all actuality, it&#8217;s probably just the first time someone <em>admitted</em> to such an extreme gaming injury.</p>
<p><em>Protip</em>: If you ever break your hand doing something no sturdy person would break their hand doing, be sure to namedrop &#8220;bar fight&#8221; and &#8220;minotaur&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/03/god-of-war-smites-human-hand-x-ray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Aibo&#8217;s Pre-Death CAT Scans And X-Rays Emerge</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/03/sony-aibos-pre-death-cat-scans-and-x-rays-emerge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/03/sony-aibos-pre-death-cat-scans-and-x-rays-emerge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kat Hannaford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aibo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cat scans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony aibo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=388318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four years after the Aibo puppy was discontinued, some CAT scans and X-rays have emerged showing two of the models&#8217; inner parts. The CT scans don&#8217;t appear to show any abnormalities, but then I&#8217;m no doctor. Or roboticist.
The Mechatronics Lab at the Mie University in Japan subjected the ERS-110 and ERS-210 models under radiography to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_sony-aibo-ct1.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Four years after the Aibo puppy was discontinued, some CAT scans and X-rays have emerged showing two of the models&#8217; inner parts. The CT scans don&#8217;t appear to show any abnormalities, but then I&#8217;m no doctor. Or roboticist.<span id="more-388318"></span></p>
<p>The Mechatronics Lab at the Mie University in Japan subjected the ERS-110 and ERS-210 models under radiography to get a better understanding of how Sony created them. There&#8217;s a joke in there somewhere about a dog and a CAT scan, but I won&#8217;t stoop so low. [<a href="http://www.robot.mach.mie-u.ac.jp/index.html">Mie University</a> via <a href="http://www.plasticpals.com/?p=22048">PlasticPals</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2010/03/500x_aibo2.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/03/sony-aibos-pre-death-cat-scans-and-x-rays-emerge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grey Matter: DIY X-Ray Photos</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/grey-matter-diy-x-ray-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/grey-matter-diy-x-ray-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Popular Science</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polaroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=372595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With some film and a salt shaker, you can take radioactive pictures.
Everyone knows light exposes film, but other forms of radiation do as well &#8211; a fact you can use to take pictures in some pretty unusual ways.
It&#8217;s also how radioactivity was first discovered. In 1896, French physicist Henri Becquerel stored some x-ray film in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_gizxray2.jpg" alt="" class="center" />With some film and a salt shaker, you can take radioactive pictures.<span id="more-372595"></span></p>
<p>Everyone knows light exposes film, but other forms of radiation do as well &#8211; a fact you can use to take pictures in some pretty unusual ways.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also how radioactivity was first discovered. In 1896, French physicist Henri Becquerel stored some x-ray film in a drawer along with a uranium rock. He suspected that uranium might emit strange rays when exposed to sunlight, but this sample had been kept entirely in the dark, so he was surprised to find, on developing it, that the mineral had exposed the film. The discovery of natural radioactivity won him a Nobel Prize.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_gizxray3.jpg" alt="" class="right" /> It&#8217;s not hard to repeat Becquerel&#8217;s experience at home with standard film. I took apart a 10-pack of Fujifilm ISO 3000 instant film and wrapped each piece in tinfoil. This must be done in absolute darkness because 3000-speed film is extremely sensitive. (I sacrificed the first pack practising in the light.)</p>
<p>Next I set a big, flat butterfly-shaped earring directly on top of the wrapped film. I suspended the most radioactive thing I have, a small radium puck from an old classroom set, several inches above the earring. This allowed the radiation to shine through it and onto the film, exposing it right through the foil wrapper. Then I developed the film by pulling it through the rollers of an old Polaroid camera (once again, in complete darkness).</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/500x_gizxray4.jpg" alt="" class="center" />This exposure took about 36 hours, determined by trial and lots of error. If you&#8217;re willing to wait longer, less-radioactive sources work too, even common salt substitute. Yes, sodium-free salt (potassium chloride) is sufficiently radioactive (from the isotope potassium-40) that after several months, a salt shaker-ful will form an image on film. Provided you don&#8217;t forget and eat the radioactive source on your breakfast.</p>
<p><b>Achtung!</b> Stronger radiation sources such as radium watch hands, and any source that&#8217;s flaking off fine particles, should be handled with care to minimise exposure and avoid contamination.</p>
<p>Photo credit: <i>Mike Walker</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.popsci.com"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/logo-gawk.png" alt="" class="left" /></a><i>Popular Science is your wormhole to the future. Reporting on what&#8217;s new and what&#8217;s next in science and technology, we deliver the future now.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/grey-matter-diy-x-ray-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Animations Of X-rays Of Mouths Talking Make Me Never Want To Talk Again</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/animations-of-x-rays-of-mouths-talking-make-me-never-want-to-talk-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/animations-of-x-rays-of-mouths-talking-make-me-never-want-to-talk-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=370861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The human body is a majestic and unsettling thing, isn&#8217;t it? Just look at these absolutely insane animations of mouths as they talk. They make me feel all&#8230; funny.
 [Hundertmark via BoingBoing]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/12/talking1.gif" alt="" class="left" />The human body is a majestic and unsettling thing, isn&#8217;t it? Just look at these absolutely insane animations of mouths as they talk. They make me feel all&#8230; funny.<span id="more-370861"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/12/thumb160x_talking2.jpg" alt="" class="left" /> [<a href="http://hundertmarkblog.de/christine-ericsdotter-x-ray-analyses-of-speech/">Hundertmark</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/12/09/x-ray-videos-of-peop.html">BoingBoing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/animations-of-x-rays-of-mouths-talking-make-me-never-want-to-talk-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brainputer</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/brainputer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/brainputer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bionics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this cyborg life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoa whoa whoa. Wait a second. You&#8217;re telling me there&#8217;s no liquid cooling? 
[Source Unknown]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/braincomputer.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Whoa whoa whoa. Wait a second. You&#8217;re telling me there&#8217;s no liquid cooling? <span id="more-366821"></span></p>
<p>[<em>Source Unknown</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/brainputer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>X-Ray Coffee Table Reveals a Hidden Life That&#8217;s Cooler than Your Real Life</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/xray_coffee_table_reveals_a_hidden_life_thats_cooler_than_your_real_life-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/xray_coffee_table_reveals_a_hidden_life_thats_cooler_than_your_real_life-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[furniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/xray_coffee_table_reveals_a_hidden_life_thats_cooler_than_your_real_life-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Diesel, your coffee table is obscuring a series of turntables used for your closet DJing habit. In reality, that fossilized trilobite-esque table up top may be more your speed. [Diesel via MoCo Loco]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/moroso_diesel.jpg" alt="" />According to Diesel, your coffee table is obscuring a series of turntables used for your closet DJing habit. In reality, that fossilized trilobite-esque table up top may be more your speed. [<a href="http://www.diesel.com/furniturefair/">Diesel</a> via <a href="http://mocoloco.com/archives/011027.php">MoCo Loco</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: furniture, diesel, foscarini, morosco, successful living, tables, x-ray, x-ray table --><br />
<span id="more-335548"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/xray_coffee_table_reveals_a_hidden_life_thats_cooler_than_your_real_life-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The X-Rays of Completely Healthy Game Consoles</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_xrays_of_completely_healthy_game_consoles-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_xrays_of_completely_healthy_game_consoles-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consoles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_xrays_of_completely_healthy_game_consoles-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just how do some of gaming&#8217;s famous consoles make their way into an x-ray machine?


We can only assume that while some poor boy with an unconfirmed fractured tibia had to wait in excruciating pain for a hospital&#8217;s only x-ray room to open, Flickr member Reintji had locked the doors from the inside as he tossed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/snesxray.jpg" alt="" />Just how do some of gaming&#8217;s famous consoles make their way into an x-ray machine?</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: art, console x-ray, gamecube, microsoft, n64, nes, nintendo, playstation, playstation 3, snes, sony, x-ray, x-rays --><br />
<span id="more-335246"></span>
<p>We can only assume that while some poor boy with an unconfirmed fractured tibia had to wait in excruciating pain for a hospital&#8217;s only x-ray room to open, Flickr member Reintji had locked the doors from the inside as he tossed forth a pile of vintage gaming equipment to be scanned despite its inherent and shameless lack of medical insurance.</p>
<p>Fast forward a few weeks, and an HMO lacky is approving the expenses of Mr. Play Station the Third. Then just for a moment, the little guy claims a victory over mega corporations&#8230;while an even littler guy nurses his still-broken leg. <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('xraygameconsole', 3, ''); </script>[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ravanderende/sets/72157594368940565/">Flickr</a> via <a href="http://www.acidmods.com/forum/index.php?topic=30166.0">AcidMods</a> via <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2009/05/01/video-game-console-x-rays/">technabob</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/the_xrays_of_completely_healthy_game_consoles-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TSA to Transition From Metal Detectors to Whole Body Scanners</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/tsa_to_transition_from_metal_detectors_to_whole_body_scanners-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/tsa_to_transition_from_metal_detectors_to_whole_body_scanners-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/tsa_to_transition_from_metal_detectors_to_whole_body_scanners-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the TSA introduced whole body scanners as a means to search passengers posing a greater security risk (like those who set off metal detectors), they now plan to use the invasive technology on everyone.

Apparently the trials at 6 airports have gone so well that the TSA would like to have all passengers &#8220;go through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/bodyscan.jpg" alt="" />While the TSA introduced <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/218015/new-security-camera-can-see-through-clothes">whole body scanners</a> as a means to search passengers posing a greater security risk (like those who set off metal detectors), they now plan to use the invasive technology on <em>everyone</em>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: security, airport security, airports, gettypic, metal detectors, tsa, tsa scanners, whole body scanners, x-rays --><span id="more-333404"></span>
<p>Apparently the trials at 6 airports have gone so well that the TSA would like to have all passengers &#8220;go through the whole-body imager instead of the walk-through metal detector.&#8221; In other words, everyone who gets on a plane will be seen quasi-naked.</p>
<p>The TSA is quick to remind the public that the technician is &#8220;off-site&#8221; and unable to associate your grey naked body with your real, grey naked body.</p>
<p>Swapping all metal detectors to whole body scanners should make that 100ml liquid rule a thing of the past, but with each scanner running $US100,000 to $US170,000 apiece, the upgrade won&#8217;t exactly be free. And really, I think the TSA should be paying <em>me</em> if they expect to see my naked behind. At least then I&#8217;d know the money was worth it. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/business/07road.html?_r=2&#038;ref=technology">NYT</a> and <a href="http://current.newsweek.com/budgettravel/2009/04/in_a_shift_the_transportation.html">Budget Travel</a> and Getty Images]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/tsa_to_transition_from_metal_detectors_to_whole_body_scanners-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>X-Ray Lamp Shows the World Your Awesome Internals</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/xray_lamp_shows_the_world_your_awesome_internals-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/xray_lamp_shows_the_world_your_awesome_internals-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[furniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/xray_lamp_shows_the_world_your_awesome_internals-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every proud PC modder uses acrylic casing to show off the sweet internals of their system. So why not take a cue from those kings of design?


This X-Ray lamp, slightly different than the X-ray lamp we&#8217;ve seen before, seems to be a real product by Sture Pallarp customisable with your own medical records. But imagine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/lunglamp.jpg" />Every proud PC modder uses acrylic casing to show off the sweet internals of their system. So why not take a cue from those kings of design?</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: decor, design, doctor, health, hospital, x-ray, x-ray lamp, x-ray lampshade --><br />
<span id="more-327794"></span>
<p>This X-Ray lamp, slightly different than the X-ray lamp <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/xray_bulb_lamps_xray_themselves_only-2.html">we&#8217;ve seen before</a>, seems to be a real product by Sture Pallarp customisable with your own medical records. But imagine the cocktail conversation, the ease with which it would initiate the opportunity to brag about what you&#8217;ve always considered your most charming feature, your lungs. </p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, these old things? Yeah. My doctor says they&#8217;re awesome and a miracle and stuff, but you know, just lungs to me. I still take things a breath at a time, like everyone else.&#8221; </p>
<p>[<a href="http://sturepallarp.se/">Sture Pallarp</a> via<a href="http://www.bookofjoe.com/2009/01/xray-lamp.html"> bookofjoe</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/xray_lamp_shows_the_world_your_awesome_internals-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aluminium MacBook X-Ray Makes Perfect Desktop Background</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/aluminium_macbook_xray_makes_perfect_desktop_background-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/aluminium_macbook_xray_makes_perfect_desktop_background-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x-rays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/aluminium_macbook_xray_makes_perfect_desktop_background-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve seen a lot of disassembled MacBooks already, but this is the first time I&#8217;ve seen one under x-rays. The image was taken by Jason De Villa because he wondered how it would it look like. I like his curiosity: Like other gadget x-rays we have featured in the past, there&#8217;s something about radiographed technology [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/macbook-xray_01.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />I&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/macbook-disassembled-174565.php">a lot</a> of <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/the_new_macbook_and_macbook_pro_dissected.html">disassembled MacBooks</a> already, but this is the first time I&#8217;ve seen one under x-rays. The image was taken by Jason De Villa because he wondered how it would it look like. I like his curiosity: Like <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/xray_bulb_lamps_xray_themselves_only-2.html">other gadget x-rays</a> we have featured in the past, there&#8217;s something about radiographed technology that satisfies my most intimate geek peeping tom and Dr. House-wannabe desires at the same time. And no, I&#8217;m not talking about the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/x+ray-of-cellphones-inside-of-cellmates-what-phone-is-in-his-butt-199318.php">cellphones-up-your-buttocks x-rays</a>. [<a href="http://www.theaftermac.com/macbook-x-rayed/">The AfterMac</a> via <a href="http://cultofmac.com/macbook-an-x-ray-view/4892">Cult of Mac</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: apple, aluminum macbook, computer, image, macbook, new macbook, x-ray --><br />
<span id="more-315822"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/aluminium_macbook_xray_makes_perfect_desktop_background-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
