<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; walmart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/walmart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Walmart Hacks Palm Pixi&#8217;s Price Down To Size: $US30 At Launch</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/walmart-hacks-palm-pixis-price-down-to-size-us30-at-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/walmart-hacks-palm-pixis-price-down-to-size-us30-at-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like retailers are going to have to do what Palm won&#8217;t: Make the Palm Pixi genuinely cheap, or at least cheaper than the Pre. For example! Walmart&#8217;s already slashed the Pixi&#8217;s price from $US100 to $US30 &#8212; pre-launch.
The $US30 Pixis (Pixies?) are back-ordered already, probably because this is the best deal in town. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_500x_palmpixi.jpg" alt="" class="center" />It looks like retailers are going to have to do what Palm won&#8217;t: Make the Palm Pixi genuinely cheap, or at least cheaper than the Pre. For example! Walmart&#8217;s already slashed the Pixi&#8217;s price from $US100 to $US30 &mdash; <em>pre-launch</em>.<span id="more-366510"></span></p>
<p>The $US30 Pixis (Pixies?) are back-ordered already, probably because this is the best deal in town. This news does two things: It raises the possibility of a free-on-contract Pixi sometime in the near future, and calls into question <em>again</em> whether or not the Pixi can ever be a truly good deal. Today, the Pre is $US100 at Amazon, so a $US30 &mdash; or even free &mdash; Pixi might not be worth the loss of screen size, speed, Wi-Fi and camera quality. And as BusinessWeek crunches it:</p>
<blockquote><p> Amortised over the required two-year contract, with the cheapest offering being Sprint&#8217;s $US70 a month unlimited data, 450 voice minute Everything Data plan, the Pixi works a out to $US74.15 a month and the Pre to $US76.25. Not much to choose from there in budgetary terms.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> And that&#8217;s at $US100 and $US150 prices for the Pixi and Pre, respectively &mdash; not the new bargain basement rates. What does that leave in the Pixi&#8217;s favour? Size? Style? The fact that its name actually sounds like a noun? [<a href="http://www.everythingpre.com/blog/palm-pixi-under-30-at-walmart-backordered/2009/11/12/">EverythingPre</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/walmart-hacks-palm-pixis-price-down-to-size-us30-at-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walmart Taking Steps To Prevent Another Black Friday Trampling</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/walmart-taking-steps-to-prevent-another-black-friday-trampling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/walmart-taking-steps-to-prevent-another-black-friday-trampling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowd control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=366281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may recall that last year, a man named Jdimytai Damour was trampled to death in the crush of a Walmart crowd eager to score Black Friday deals. This year, Walmart is taking steps to prevent another tragic incident.
In fact, they went so far as to call in the same crowd-control experts that help to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/walmart.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_walmart.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>You may recall that last year, a man named <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/walmart_shoppers_cracked_jokes_at_trampled_workers_expense-2/">Jdimytai Damour was trampled to death in the crush of a Walmart crowd</a> eager to score Black Friday deals. This year, Walmart is taking steps to prevent another tragic incident.<span id="more-366281"></span></p>
<p>In fact, they went so far as to call in the same crowd-control experts that help to keep things under control at major events like the Super Bowl and the Olympics. Each store will have its own game plan, but the vast majority of locations (not just Super Centres) will be open for 24 hours starting on Monday, November 26 (Thanksgiving) and ending the next day in the evening. That way, Walmart hopes to prevent mammoth crowds from gathering outside the store waiting for the doors to open. They are also putting many of the most popular items behind displays, where employees will supervise lines and hand out the products to customers in an orderly fashion. Additional workers will be stationed outside the store to help direct foot traffic.</p>
<p>Because of incidents like the one at Walmart, the National Retail Federation has, for the first time, put together a list of guidelines aimed at crowd-control in stores. Of course, even with all these precautions, I fear that this year will bring more horror stories about deadly violence erupting between crazed bargain hunters. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/11/business/11security.html">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/walmart-taking-steps-to-prevent-another-black-friday-trampling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Almost 2010 And CDs Are Not Dead Yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/its-almost-2010-and-cds-are-not-dead-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/its-almost-2010-and-cds-are-not-dead-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data visualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[napster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhapsody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve started to buy vinyl records again. It&#8217;s not because of the sound. It&#8217;s the touch and the pretty pictures. Obviously, vinyl is not why CDs are dying. Zoom-zoom in, digital boys and girls.
What surprises me about these facts and figures &#8212; apart from iTunes skyrocketing again after the introduction of variable pricing &#8212; is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/MusicRetail_R7_Mint.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_MusicRetail_R7_Mint.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>I&#8217;ve started to buy vinyl records again. It&#8217;s not because of the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/sorry_stereo_but_beatles_in_mono_rocks_a_lot_more-2/">sound</a>. It&#8217;s the touch and the pretty pictures. Obviously, vinyl is not why CDs are dying. Zoom-zoom in, digital boys and girls.<span id="more-365608"></span></p>
<p>What surprises me about these facts and figures &mdash; apart from iTunes skyrocketing again after the introduction of variable pricing &mdash; is the fact that CDs are not completely dead yet. They are clearly going down, but I had this mental image in which all of those round mirrors were destroyed, melting like Dali clocks in a desert of indifference. [<a href="http://www.mint.com/blog/trends/music-retail-the-rise-of-digital/?display=wide">Mint</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/its-almost-2010-and-cds-are-not-dead-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walmart&#8217;s War On Amazon Hurts Publishing Industry (Even More)</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/walmarts-war-on-amazon-hurts-the-publishing-industry-even-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/walmarts-war-on-amazon-hurts-the-publishing-industry-even-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;If there is going to be a &#8216;Wal-Mart of the Web&#8217;, it is going to be Walmart.com,&#8221; says Walmart.com CEO Raul Vazquez. This &#8220;Amazon&#8221; thing is royally mucking that up, and Walmart&#8217;s not gonna take it anymore.
The first shot at Amazon reported by the WSJ is kinda weak in the grand scheme of things: Yesterday, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/walllmart.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_walllmart.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>&#8220;If there is going to be a &#8216;Wal-Mart of the Web&#8217;, it is going to be Walmart.com,&#8221; <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/amazon-now-delivers-stuff-the-same-day-you-order-it/">says Walmart.com CEO Raul Vazquez</a>. This &#8220;Amazon&#8221; thing is royally mucking that up, and Walmart&#8217;s not gonna take it anymore.<span id="more-360789"></span></p>
<p>The first shot at Amazon reported by the WSJ is kinda weak in the grand scheme of things: Yesterday, Walmart started selling 10 &#8220;hotly anticipated&#8221; books, like almost-President-of-the-United-States Sarah Palin&#8217;s <em>Going Rogue</em> for 10 US bucks. The paper kind. For the same price as the pretend books you buy on a Kindle. Amazon fired a volley back, matching the price. Walmart went to its classic $US9 position this morning. Ker-plow.</p>
<p>This is apparently deeply frightening to publishers. Why? Because once people expect a book for $US10, they&#8217;re not gonna pay $US28 for it, which would seriously alter the economy of the publishing industry. And I mean, they&#8217;re already <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/times-hulu-for-magazines-idea-is-so-so-doomed/">deathly afraid</a> of the very uncertain <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/apple-tablet-aiming-to-redefine-newspapers-textbooks-magazines/">future of publishing</a>. A standard $US10 price would make books feel more disposable &mdash; granted, this is the future that&#8217;s coming with eBooks anyway.</p>
<p>Walmart actually still makes a bit of money at that price &mdash; and obviously Amazon does hawking eBooks for that much. The people this would seriously screw are independent booksellers, who couldn&#8217;t scrape by on margins that low. Which makes you wonder how they&#8217;re going to continue existing in a world where we&#8217;re all buying books, for cheap, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/apple-tablet-aiming-to-redefine-newspapers-textbooks-magazines/">on tablets</a>. Amazon and Walmart&#8217;s likely just the beginning of the end. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125565024634288895.html">WSJ</a> <em>Image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/walmartmovie/32663335/">Ryan Conway/Brave New Films</a>/Flickr</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/walmarts-war-on-amazon-hurts-the-publishing-industry-even-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walmart Employee Arrested For Demoing Porn On HDTVs</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/walmart-employee-arrested-for-demoing-porn-on-hdtvs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/walmart-employee-arrested-for-demoing-porn-on-hdtvs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=353554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two 20-year-olds were recently arrested on a felony obscenity complaint after replacing demo DVDs in a Arkansas Walmart with hardcore pornography. The video played on six screens in full view of shoppers.
A customer &#8220;eventually&#8221; notified the manager, and the DVD was removed from the player. &#8220;Eventually&#8221; as in, &#8220;after we all got our fill of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/walmart_guy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_walmart_guy.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Two 20-year-olds were recently arrested on a felony obscenity complaint after replacing demo DVDs in a Arkansas Walmart with hardcore pornography. The video played on six screens in full view of shoppers.<span id="more-353554"></span></p>
<p>A customer &#8220;eventually&#8221; notified the manager, and the DVD was removed from the player. &#8220;Eventually&#8221; as in, &#8220;after we all got our fill of the hot action&#8221;. <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/walmart-gadget-shoppers-sometime-look-like-this/">So <em>that&#8217;s</em> what this guy was looking at</a>! [<a href="http://www.swtimes.com/articles/2009/09/10/news/news091009_08.txt">swtimes</a> via <a href="http://obscurestore.com/">obscuredrugstore</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/walmart-employee-arrested-for-demoing-porn-on-hdtvs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walmart Gadget Shoppers Sometime Look Like THIS</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/walmart-gadget-shoppers-sometime-look-like-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/walmart-gadget-shoppers-sometime-look-like-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=349996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This guy doesn&#8217;t look like your average gadget shopper&#8230;unless he&#8217;s shopping in Walmart. We&#8217;ll I&#8217;ll be dammed&#8212;he is shopping in Walmart! I know this because the site People of Walmart told me so. Hilarious. Sad. Disturbing&#8230;check it out. [POW]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/half_shirt_walmart_shopper.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_half_shirt_walmart_shopper.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>This guy doesn&#8217;t look like your average gadget shopper&#8230;unless he&#8217;s shopping in Walmart. We&#8217;ll I&#8217;ll be dammed&mdash;he is shopping in Walmart! I know this because the site <em>People of Walmart</em> told me so. Hilarious. Sad. Disturbing&#8230;check it out. [<a href="http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/">POW</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/walmart-gadget-shoppers-sometime-look-like-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Hello, $US299 Xbox 360 Elite</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/why-hello-us299-xbox-360-elite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/why-hello-us299-xbox-360-elite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 elite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=348101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We knew it was coming, especially after the $US299 PS3 Slim, but here it is, stamped in dead trees for a Walmart ad: The Xbox 360 Elite for $US299. Don&#8217;t forget those HDMI cables. [Thanks Randall!]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/wallyelite.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/500x_wallyelite.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>We knew <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/oracle-of-xbox-360-packaging-predicts-pro-will-be-murdered-in-its-sleep-by-cheaper-elite/">it was coming</a>, especially after the $US299 PS3 Slim, but here it is, stamped in dead trees for a Walmart ad: The Xbox 360 Elite for $US299. Don&#8217;t <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/xbox-360-elite-no-longer-including-hdmi-cable/">forget those HDMI cables</a>. [<em>Thanks Randall!</em>]<span id="more-348101"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/why-hello-us299-xbox-360-elite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Variable Song Pricing Hits Amazon&#8217;s and Walmart&#8217;s Digital Music Stores</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/variable_song_pricing_hits_amazons_and_walmarts_digital_music_stores-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/variable_song_pricing_hits_amazons_and_walmarts_digital_music_stores-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/variable_song_pricing_hits_amazons_and_walmarts_digital_music_stores-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Now that Apple is slowly and quietly switching all its freshly DRM-free tracks to a popularity-based variable pricing scheme, we almost didn&#8217;t notice that Walmart and Amazon have taken the same step.


Amazon now has prices ranging from a low of $US0.79 to a high of $US1.29, the same as iTunes, and its highest priced tracks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/Amazon-MP3.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Now that Apple is slowly and quietly <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/itunes_tiered_pricing_goes_live_we_get_gently_screwed-2.html">switching</a> all its freshly DRM-free tracks to a popularity-based variable pricing scheme, we almost didn&#8217;t notice that Walmart and Amazon have taken the same step.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: digital music, amazon, itunes, mp3, store, variable pricing, walmart --><br />
<span id="more-333446"></span>
<p>Amazon now has prices ranging from a low of $US0.79 to a high of $US1.29, the same as iTunes, and its highest priced tracks now make up ten of its top 100 list. Walmart, for its part, is a little cheaper, from a low of $US0.64 to a high of $US1.24. It looks like the music labels have finally gotten their way in this battle. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/04/07/amazon.mp3.raises.prices/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/variable_song_pricing_hits_amazons_and_walmarts_digital_music_stores-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seeing Viral Spread of Target Stores Across U.S. Somehow Not as Terrifying as Wal-Mart</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/seeing_viral_spread_of_target_stores_across_us_somehow_not_as_terrifying_as_walmart-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/seeing_viral_spread_of_target_stores_across_us_somehow_not_as_terrifying_as_walmart-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/seeing_viral_spread_of_target_stores_across_us_somehow_not_as_terrifying_as_walmart-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seeing Wal-Mart spread across the U.S. in that video last month reminded me of a virus consuming mankind, but this Target one? Not so much. It&#8217;s not a perfect store, but it&#8217;s certainly no Wal-Mart.


While both companies saw explosive growth from when they were founded (both in 1962) until just a few months ago, when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/TargetSpread.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />Seeing <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/the_terrifying_spread_of_the_walmart_plague-2.html">Wal-Mart spread across the U.S.</a> in that video last month reminded me of a virus consuming mankind, but this <a href="http://projects.flowingdata.com/target/">Target one?</a> Not so much. It&#8217;s not a perfect store, but it&#8217;s certainly no Wal-Mart.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: nowhere to run, cancer, epidemic, retail, target, virus, wal-mart --><br />
<span id="more-325178"></span>
<p>While both companies saw explosive growth from when they were founded (both in 1962) until just a few months ago, when the retail sector imploded, the way in which they expanded was markedly different.</p>
<p>Whereas Wal-Mart spread from a central point like your traditional virus, Target was more like a metastasising cancer, beginning in the central U.S., like Wal-Mart, and then popping up in targets of opportunity wherever there was good business.</p>
<p>And now, just like Wal-Mart, they to have a Gizmodo writer comparing their stores to something terrible that can invade the human body. <em>Victory!</em> [<a href="http://flowingdata.com/2009/01/30/mapping-and-animating-growth-of-target-across-us/">FlowingData</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/seeing_viral_spread_of_target_stores_across_us_somehow_not_as_terrifying_as_walmart-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Potty, Because Potty Training Wasn&#8217;t Disgusting Enough</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/jack_potty_because_potty_training_wasnt_disgusting_enough-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/jack_potty_because_potty_training_wasnt_disgusting_enough-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toilets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/jack_potty_because_potty_training_wasnt_disgusting_enough-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My kid is almost the age where I need to consider potty training incentives. Walmart suggests the $US15 Jack Potty toilet/slot machine (get it?) with sensors that &#8220;detect a deposit and trigger lights and sounds.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/Jack_Potty.jpg" />My kid is almost the age where I need to consider potty training incentives. Walmart suggests the $US15 <a href="http://consumerist.com/5142505/get-your-kids-addicted-to-gambling-at-an-early-age-with-the-jack-potty-training-seat">Jack Potty toilet/slot machine</a> (get it?) with sensors that &#8220;detect a deposit and trigger lights and sounds.&#8221;</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: li'l gambler, gambling, jack potty, safety 1st, slot machines, walmart --><br />
<span id="more-325060"></span>
<p>For $US15, I can&#8217;t imagine exactly how good those sensors are&mdash;my experience with Jack Potty&#8217;s brand, Safety 1st, has not been positive at all, but that&#8217;s not the real issue. I know Walmart is trying to help, and I&#8217;m sure it makes sense to them: The percentage of people who throw away most of their Social Security checks on slot machines probably do tend to spend whatever remains at Supercenters.</p>
<p>But how will this affect kids, mentally? <a href="http://consumerist.com/5142505/get-your-kids-addicted-to-gambling-at-an-early-age-with-the-jack-potty-training-seat">Risk of gambling addiction</a> aside, a friend of mine said it best: When our girls are old enough to visit Las Vegas and look out over the sea of slot machines, will they say, &#8220;Wow, check out all those public restrooms!&#8221;?? Scary. [<a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=8342867">Walmart</a> via <a href="http://consumerist.com/5142505/get-your-kids-addicted-to-gambling-at-an-early-age-with-the-jack-potty-training-seat">Consumerist</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/jack_potty_because_potty_training_wasnt_disgusting_enough-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
