<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; unix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/unix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:39:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Pseudo Sudo Patent</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsofts-pseudo-sudo-patent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsofts-pseudo-sudo-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groklaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, how exactly did Microsoft end up patenting Sudo, a years-old Linux command-line tool, without someone stepping in to stop them? Easy! They didn&#8217;t.
The story was the subject of much hyperventilation last week which revolved mostly around a few impassioned quotes:

 Here it is, patent number7617530. Thanks, USPTO, for giving Microsoft, which is already a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/thumb160x_linux_windows_copy.jpg" alt="" class="left" />So, how exactly did Microsoft end up <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsoft-patents-the-sudo-command/">patenting Sudo</a>, a years-old Linux command-line tool, without <em>someone</em> stepping in to stop them? Easy! They didn&#8217;t.<span id="more-367204"></span></p>
<p>The story was the subject of much hyperventilation last week which revolved mostly around a few impassioned quotes:<br />
<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<blockquote><p> Here it is, patent number7617530. Thanks, USPTO, for giving Microsoft, which is already a monopoly, a monopoly on something that&#8217;s been in use since 1980 and wasn&#8217;t invented by Microsoft. Here&#8217;s Wikipedia&#8217;s description of sudo, which you can meaningfully compare to Microsoft&#8217;s description of its &#8220;invention&#8221;.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> This from <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111094923390">Groklaw</a>, a site that specialises in free and open source software legal affairs, i.e. exactly this kind of thing. But for whatever reason &mdash; zeal? clicks? &mdash; their reading of the patent, which <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsoft-patents-the-sudo-command/">we picked up</a>, turned out to overblown. Says Sudo maintainer Todd Miller, via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/microsofts-psuedo-sudo-patent-doesnt-really-cover-sudo.ars">Ars</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p> I&#8217;ve already received a number of questions about US patent 7,617,530 that some people seem to believe might cover sudo. I don&#8217;t think that is the case,&#8221; he wrote. &#8220;Sudo simply doesn&#8217;t work this way. When a command is run via sudo the user is actively running the command as a different user. What is described in the patent is a mechanism whereby an application or the operating system detects that an action needs to be run with increased privileges and automatically prompts the user with a list of potential users that have the appropriate privilege level to perform the task.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> So, if not this, then what does the Microsoft patent cover? Back to <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/microsofts-psuedo-sudo-patent-doesnt-really-cover-sudo.ars">Ars</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p> Specifically, it describes a user interface which displays accounts that have the necessary rights to perform an action when the user is blocked from performing an action that requires higher access privileges.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> These are similar, but not <em>patent</em> similar.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/sudowich_01_01.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Turns out though, that there is a Linux tool called PolicyKit just like what Microsoft patented, which prompts users to switch to a higher-level user account when they hit against a permissions barrier. It was created <em>after the patent was filed.</em> So, Microsoft, on all counts: not guilty. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/11/microsofts-psuedo-sudo-patent-doesnt-really-cover-sudo.ars">ArsTechnica</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/microsofts-pseudo-sudo-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware: UNIX Time to Read 1234567890 On Friday the 13th</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/beware_unix_time_to_read_1234567890_on_friday_the_13th-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/beware_unix_time_to_read_1234567890_on_friday_the_13th-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doomsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/beware_unix_time_to_read_1234567890_on_friday_the_13th-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget the Mayans and their silly 2012 doomsday scenario. The real end of the world will happen because of that most venerable of operating systems: UNIX.


That&#8217;s because next Friday, UNIX time will read 1234567890. Scary! And, it just so happens that this event will coincide with one of the more superstitious days on our calendar, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/unix-category.jpg" alt="" />Forget the Mayans and their silly 2012 doomsday scenario. The real end of the world will happen because of that most venerable of operating systems: UNIX.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: unix doom, doomsday, end times, linux, maddog, unix --><br />
<span id="more-326224"></span>
<p>That&#8217;s because next Friday, UNIX time will read 1234567890. <em>Scary!</em> And, it just so happens that this event will coincide with one of the more superstitious days on our calendar, Friday the 13th. <em>Scarier!</em></p>
<p>Well-known UNIX and Linux personality John Maddog Hall plans on celebrating the event in style:</p>
<blockquote><p>While our friends at Bell Labs (er, ah, Lucent&#8230;.O.K. &#8220;Alcatel-Lucent&#8221;) strive to understand this phenomenon, I will be doing my civic duty by drinking fine beer, and maybe an Islay scotch. This is hard to do while you are holding your breath, but I will suffer through. Who knows, perhaps the U.S. government will give us a &#8220;bailout&#8221; to study this issue.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To see when this takes place in your time zone, run this little Perl script, which I promise won&#8217;t end the world before next Friday:</p>
<p><strong>perl -e &#8216;print scalar localtime(1234567890),&#8221;\n&#8221;;&#8217;</strong></p>
<p>Shit just got real, folks. Say good-bye to loved ones. Make sure you start with your Windows machines, because UNIX is probably going to take them out first. Part of an agreement with Linux and Linus Torvalds, I&#8217;ve heard. [<a href="http://www.linuxpromagazine.com/online/blogs/paw_prints_writings_of_the_maddog/one_of_those_magic_times_on_friday_the_13th?blogbox">Linux Pro Magazine</a> via <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/08/2043206">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/beware_unix_time_to_read_1234567890_on_friday_the_13th-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People Have No Idea What Windows 7 Is</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/people_have_no_idea_what_windows_7_is-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/people_have_no_idea_what_windows_7_is-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kde 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/people_have_no_idea_what_windows_7_is-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proof Microsoft could&#8217;ve done whatever it wanted with Windows 7 and people would&#8217;ve swallowed it, as long as it&#8217;s pretty: People told a demo of KDE 4 was Windows 7 were amazed.

  [ZDNet via CrunchGear]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/win7.png" alt="" />Proof Microsoft could&#8217;ve done whatever it wanted with Windows 7 and people would&#8217;ve swallowed it, as long as it&#8217;s pretty: People told a demo of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kde_4">KDE 4</a> was Windows 7 were amazed.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: windows 7, kde 4, microsoft, unix, windows --><br />
<span id="more-326041"></span> <object width="506" height="417"><param name="movie" value="http://www.zdnet.com.au/video/embed/22470997"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.zdnet.com.au/video/embed/22470997" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="506" height="417"></object><br /> [<a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/software/soa/Is-it-Windows-7-or-KDE-4-/0,139023769,339294810,00.htm">ZDNet</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/02/06/rofl-regular-people-cant-tell-the-difference-between-windows-7-and-kde-4/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/people_have_no_idea_what_windows_7_is-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twenty Five Year Old Unix Bug Finally Fixed</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/twenty_five_year_old_unix_bug_finally_fixed-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/twenty_five_year_old_unix_bug_finally_fixed-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/twenty_five_year_old_unix_bug_finally_fixed-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re not sure why nobody&#8217;s caught this bug until now, but OpenBSD developer Marc Balmer has just closed the book on a 25-year-old flaw affecting BSD file systems. He found it when an OpenBSD user emailed him about SAMBA crashing, which he then traced to a workaround SAMBA used to function correctly on BSD systems, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/codingbug.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none"/>We&#8217;re not sure why nobody&#8217;s caught this bug until now, but OpenBSD developer Marc Balmer has just closed the book on a 25-year-old flaw affecting BSD file systems. He found it when an OpenBSD user emailed him about SAMBA crashing, which he then traced to a workaround SAMBA used to function correctly on BSD systems, which he THEN traced back to a flaw that existed since August of 1983. This bug is in every single BSD system since then, including Mac OS X. The code itself was a very trivial fix, which makes it all the crazier that it took 25 years to do so. [<a href="http://osnews.com/story/19731/The-25-Year-Old-UNIX-Bug">OS News</a> - <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jaywalk/901532835/">Photo credit</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: bsd, bug, bugs, openbsd, samba, software, unix --><br />
<span id="more-288998"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/twenty_five_year_old_unix_bug_finally_fixed-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
