<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; tv shows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/tv-shows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Flo TV Shown Off On The iPhone For Reasons Unknown</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/flo-tv-shown-off-on-the-iphone-for-reasons-unknown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/flo-tv-shown-off-on-the-iphone-for-reasons-unknown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flo tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=368411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get that this Flo TV iPhone demo is just a proof of concept. That&#8217;s fine! I&#8217;m just a little confused as to what the concept is.
Is it just what they&#8217;re showing us? A Flo TV app, that requires some kind of accessory to tune into broadcasts? That&#8217;s possible, but given how well the iPhone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/p1060779-copy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_p1060779-copy.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>I get that this <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qualcomm-flo-tv-ptv-hands-on-us250-to-shut-up-the-kids/">Flo TV</a> iPhone demo is just a proof of concept. That&#8217;s fine! I&#8217;m just a little confused as to what the concept is.<span id="more-368411"></span></p>
<p>Is it just what they&#8217;re showing us? A Flo TV app, that requires some kind of accessory to tune into broadcasts? That&#8217;s possible, but given how well the iPhone can stream video over 3G, it&#8217;d be a hard sell, even with Flo TV&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/qualcomm-flo-tv-ptv-hands-on-us250-to-shut-up-the-kids/">cable-like channel selection</a>. It would also help if said accessory wasn&#8217;t larger than the actual iPhone.</p>
<p>Or is it to foster excitement over the idea of native Flo TV hardware support in the iPhone, like in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/htc-imagio">HTC Imagio</a>? Because that will never, ever happen. So again, <em>why</em>? [<a href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/11/19/flo-tv-for-iphone-demoed/">Electric Pig</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/flo-tv-shown-off-on-the-iphone-for-reasons-unknown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All Other Houses Can Bite Bender House&#8217;s Shiny, Metal&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/all-other-houses-can-bite-bender-houses-shiny-metal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/all-other-houses-can-bite-bender-houses-shiny-metal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[futurama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some wants a house on the ocean. Others require granite countertops, steel appliances and hardwood floors. We just ask for a house that looks like Bender. [Warming Glow via Geekologie]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bender-house.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bender-house.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Some wants a house on the ocean. Others require granite countertops, steel appliances and hardwood floors. We just ask for a house that looks like Bender. [<a href="http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/2009/11/i-want-this-house/bender-house">Warming Glow</a> via <a href="http://www.geekologie.com/2009/11/burn_it_down_the_bender_head_h.php">Geekologie</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/all-other-houses-can-bite-bender-houses-shiny-metal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Should TV Over Bittorrent Make Money?</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-should-tv-over-bittorrent-make-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-should-tv-over-bittorrent-make-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifehacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us, at some point or other, for some reason or other, have downloaded a TV show over Bittorrent. Some of us now only watch TV via shows that we&#8217;ve downloaded. And while the convenience is pretty sweet now, if things continue the way they&#8217;re going, there&#8217;s a real question over how the TV [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of us, at some point or other, for some reason or other, have downloaded a TV show over Bittorrent. Some of us now <em>only</em> watch TV via shows that we&#8217;ve downloaded. And while the convenience is pretty sweet now, if things continue the way they&#8217;re going, there&#8217;s a real question over how the TV shows we all enjoy watching for free on the internet will be funded. Gus over at <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/11/how-will-channel-bt-fund-itself/">Lifehacker</a> has a great post looking at the different options for the TV networks that&#8217;s definitely worth a read. Check it out.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2009/11/how-will-channel-bt-fund-itself/">Lifehacker</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/how-should-tv-over-bittorrent-make-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Wants iTunes To Replace Your Pay TV For $US30 A Month</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/apple-wants-itunes-to-replace-your-pay-tv-for-us30-a-month/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/apple-wants-itunes-to-replace-your-pay-tv-for-us30-a-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s apparently pitching to US networks a subscription plan that would deliver all your TV shows through iTunes for $US30 a month, with the goal of launching it next year.
But don&#8217;t hold your breath on it happening yet: Peter Kafka has &#8220;yet to hear of a single programmer that has made a firm commitment&#8221;. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/itunestv.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_itunestv.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Apple&#8217;s <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091102/apples-itunes-pitch-tv-for-30-a-month/">apparently pitching to US networks</a> a subscription plan that would deliver all your TV shows through iTunes for $US30 a month, with the goal of launching it next year.<span id="more-364252"></span></p>
<p>But don&#8217;t hold your breath on it happening yet: Peter Kafka has &#8220;yet to hear of a single programmer that has made a firm commitment&#8221;. As he points out, while networks are constantly looking for new revenue, like those arsehole aliens in <em>Independence Day</em> moving from world to world consuming every natural resource, they&#8217;re nervous about the idea for a lot of reasons.</p>
<p>A lot of it has to do with the icky, sticky relationships between networks and pay TV operators, where everybody&#8217;s worried about losing out as people start to watch more and more TV content online, not in their living rooms — where streaming video eats up bandwidth, and advertising revenues aren&#8217;t nearly as rich (which is why Hulu <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/what-a-paid-hulu-could-look-like/">wants to figure out new ways</a> to get you to pay).</p>
<p>While these little complications might slow the process down, the exodus is inevitable. There&#8217;s no stopping this. The internet is the new pay TV: Netflix, Hulu, BitTorrent. Apple might not get to launch it in a few months, but it will happen. Just give it time. The <em>actually</em> crazy part, if you ask me, is that the Apple TV might even live up to its name. [<a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091102/apples-itunes-pitch-tv-for-30-a-month/">Hulu</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/apple-wants-itunes-to-replace-your-pay-tv-for-us30-a-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>30 Rock&#8217;s Emphatically Branded Windows Computer Is Confusing</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/30-rock-s-imaginary-yet-emphatically-branded-windows-computer-is-confusing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/30-rock-s-imaginary-yet-emphatically-branded-windows-computer-is-confusing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On this week&#8217;s 30 Rock, we found out Jack&#8217;s (or Jack&#8217;s designer&#8217;s) choice of computer, and it&#8217;s a weird one: It&#8217;s a prop model of a computer that doesn&#8217;t exist, yet it&#8217;s forcefully branded with the Windows logo.
Warning: Clip is US-only. U-S-A! U-S-A! 

At first glance I thought it was a black MacBook with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Screen_shot_2009-10-24_at_10.08.36_AM.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Screen_shot_2009-10-24_at_10.08.36_AM.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>On this week&#8217;s <em>30 Rock</em>, we found out Jack&#8217;s (or Jack&#8217;s designer&#8217;s) choice of computer, and it&#8217;s a weird one: It&#8217;s a prop model of a computer that doesn&#8217;t exist, yet it&#8217;s forcefully branded with the Windows logo.<span id="more-362577"></span></p>
<p>Warning: Clip is US-only. <del datetime="2009-10-25T20:54:24+00:00">U-S-A! U-S-A!</del> </p>
<p><object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/G7hgDtw4H-whLr8bgh-F0g/966/976"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/G7hgDtw4H-whLr8bgh-F0g/966/976" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="512" height="296"></object></p>
<p>At first glance I thought it was a black MacBook with a Windows logo pasted over the Apple, but that&#8217;s not it &mdash; the case is too shiny and angular, looking more like a slick Lenovo or something. The thing is, a prop computer isn&#8217;t weird at all, but usually they&#8217;re just faceless slabs of grey or black. This one has a very prominent Windows logo, even though as far as I know there&#8217;s never been a Windows computer like that (maybe you can buy them in the Windows store!). Product placement usually works better when the product being placed is, you know, something you can buy. Like on <em>Top Chef</em>: After watching that show, I always drive my Toyota™ Rav4™ to my local Whole Foods™ for supplies like Swanson&#8217;s™ chicken broth, and after cooking in my GE™ Monogram™ kitchen with my Calphalon™ cookware, I make sure to safely store my leftovers using the Glad™ family of products. <em>That&#8217;s</em> how you do product placement. [<a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/103853/30-rock-into-the-crevasse?c=966:976">Hulu</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/30-rock-s-imaginary-yet-emphatically-branded-windows-computer-is-confusing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What A Paid Hulu Could Look Like</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/what-a-paid-hulu-could-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/what-a-paid-hulu-could-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video on demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AllThingsD&#8217;s Peter Kafka is busy dousing concerns that recent statements by News Corp&#8217;s Chase Carey&#8212;that &#8220;It&#8217;s time to start getting paid for broadcast content online&#8221;&#8212;mean that Hulu is going to die, dead. 
Hulu, the joint venture between News Corp.&#8217;s Fox, GE&#8217;s NBC Universal and Disney&#8217;s ABC, doesn&#8217;t plan on charging people to watch the stuff [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/hulutop.jpg" alt="" class="center" />AllThingsD&#8217;s Peter Kafka is busy <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091023/how-much-will-you-have-to-pay-for-hulu-nothing-how-much-will-you-pay-for-hulu-plus-good-question/">dousing concerns</a> that recent statements by News Corp&#8217;s Chase Carey&mdash;that &#8220;It&#8217;s time to start getting paid for broadcast content online&#8221;&mdash;mean that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/hulus-free-glory-days-are-officially-numbered/">Hulu is going to die, dead</a>. <span id="more-362392"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Hulu, the joint venture between News Corp.&#8217;s Fox, GE&#8217;s NBC Universal and Disney&#8217;s ABC, doesn&#8217;t plan on charging people to watch the stuff it&#8217;s currently airing on the site–a mix of first-run shows from broadcast TV, a limited number of cable TV shows and a smattering of movies. But Hulu is trying to figure out how to create some kind of premium offering where you&#8217;ll pay for stuff that isn&#8217;t on the site right now.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> This jibes with Carey&#8217;s adjacent reassurance that &#8220;not all content on Hulu would be behind a pay wall&#8221;, which hints at the <em>addition</em> of some kind of subscription or pay-per-view system, that could conceivably leave current offerings untouched. This is a plausible possibility, but far from sure: Kafka&#8217;s sources says Hulu doesn&#8217;t actually <em>have</em> a plan yet, so anything is possible. </p>
<p>Plan or no plan, telling everyone what they <em>aren&#8217;t</em> going to do would do Hulu good &mdash; vague threats of fees for &#8220;broadcast content&#8221; are just terrifying everyone. [<a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091023/how-much-will-you-have-to-pay-for-hulu-nothing-how-much-will-you-pay-for-hulu-plus-good-question/">AllThingsD</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/what-a-paid-hulu-could-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hulu&#8217;s Free Glory Days Are Officially Numbered</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/hulus-free-glory-days-are-officially-numbered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/hulus-free-glory-days-are-officially-numbered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hulu, at the behest of its co-parent News Corp, is going to start charging for content in 2010. This is not so good.
Here&#8217;s the money quote from NewsCorpian Chase Carey, so there&#8217;s no confusion:
 It&#8217;s time to start getting paid for broadcast content online. I think a free model is a very difficult way to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_hulu_vs_netflix.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_hulu_vs_netflix.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Hulu, at the behest of its co-parent News Corp, is going to start charging for content in 2010. <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/tvbizwire/2009/10/hulu-to-charge-viewers-money-i.php">This is not so good.<span id="more-362183"></span></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/blog/ADverse_Atkinson_on_Advertising/23941-Chase_Carey_Hulu_to_Charge_in_2010.php?nid=2228&amp;source=title&amp;rid=6454445">the money quote</a> from NewsCorpian Chase Carey, so there&#8217;s no confusion:</p>
<blockquote><p> It&#8217;s time to start getting paid for broadcast content online. I think a free model is a very difficult way to capture the value of our content. I think what we need to do is deliver that content to consumers in a way where they will appreciate the value. Hulu concurs with that, it needs to evolve to have a meaningful subscription model as part of its business</p>
</blockquote>
<p> An optimist might interpret this as a move toward tiered access, or even the decidedly good addition of paid premium content, like HBO and Showtime. But <em>read carefully</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p> It&#8217;s time to start getting paid for <strong>broadcast content</strong> online</p>
</blockquote>
<p> It doesn&#8217;t get any less premium than broadcast content, which is exactly what Carey says we&#8217;ll soon be paying for &mdash; sometime in 2010, he supposes. This is extra-extra-foreboding next to last week&#8217;s statements about a paid Hulu from Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes, highlighted by <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/tvbizwire/2009/10/hulu-to-charge-viewers-money-i.php">TVBizwire</a>: &#8220;That&#8217;s not an if,&#8221; he said &#8220;that&#8217;s a when.&#8221; It was fun while it lasted, I guess.</p>
<p>On a <em>totally unrelated</em> note, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/how_to_use_bittorrent_like_a_pro-2/">here</a> <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/how-to-use-the-heck-out-of-usenet/">are</a> some neat articles, for pleasure reading! [<a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/blog/ADverse_Atkinson_on_Advertising/23941-Chase_Carey_Hulu_to_Charge_in_2010.php?nid=2228&amp;source=title&amp;rid=6454445">Broadcasting Cable</a> via <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/tvbizwire/2009/10/hulu-to-charge-viewers-money-i.php">TVBizwire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/hulus-free-glory-days-are-officially-numbered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Media Center Internet TV Delivers Zune Video Podcasts</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/windows-7-media-center-internet-tv-delivers-zune-video-podcasts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/windows-7-media-center-internet-tv-delivers-zune-video-podcasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7 media center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case you missed it buried underneath the upgrade to Netflix Watch Instantly the other day, Microsoft has gone live with Internet TV on Windows 7 Media Center, offering content (of rather poor picture quality) from the following providers:
&#8226; CBS Audience Network: Featuring a variety of shows from CBS Primetime, Daytime, Extras, and TV [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case you missed it buried underneath the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/streamlined-netflix-experience-now-available-on-windows-7-media-center/">upgrade to Netflix Watch Instantly the other day</a>, Microsoft has gone live with Internet TV on Windows 7 Media Center, offering content (of rather poor picture quality) from the following providers:<span id="more-362088"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&bull; CBS Audience Network: Featuring a variety of shows from CBS Primetime, Daytime, Extras, and TV Classics, including full-length episodes of current TV shows, CBS Classics TV shows, short clips, and Web originals.<br />
&bull; Full Zune Video Podcast Library: Thousands of hours of entertainment with full TV episodes, webisodes, clips, and videos from providers including ABC News, CBS News, CNBC, CNET TV, Comedy Central, Current TV, The Discovery Channel, Fox, G4 TV, HBO, MSNBC, NBC, Showtime, and Revision 3, along with some of the best user-generated videos on the Web. Some video podcasts are also available in HD.<br />
&bull; MSN and msnbc.com: Clips as well as full length episodes from TV shows such as Arrested Development, news and weather from MSNBC, editor picks and most popular videos, five day weather forecasts, news, video playlists, music videos, movie trailers and more.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> If you haven&#8217;t already noticed the upgrades in your Windows 7 Media centre menu, you can manually update by going into Tasks &gt;&gt;Settings &gt;&gt; General &gt;&gt; Automatic Download Options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/windows-7-media-center-internet-tv-delivers-zune-video-podcasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Guy Windows 7 Clip Isn&#8217;t All That Exciting</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/family-guy-windows-7-clip-isnt-all-that-exciting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/family-guy-windows-7-clip-isnt-all-that-exciting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family guy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this morning we heard that Family Guy is teaming up with Microsoft to promote Windows 7 on an upcoming show. If this clip is anything to go by, I wouldn&#8217;t get your hopes up for comedy.

Again, Microsoft&#8217;s sponsorship of the show means that it will air commercial-free. Let&#8217;s hope the final version makes sitting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/family_guy_windows_504x441.shkl.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_family_guy_windows_504x441.shkl.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Earlier this morning we heard that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/family-guy-and-microsoft-team-up-for-hackiest-ever-hackathon/">Family Guy is teaming up with Microsoft</a> to promote Windows 7 on an upcoming show. If this clip is anything to go by, I wouldn&#8217;t get your hopes up for comedy.<span id="more-360275"></span></p>
<p><object width="500" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jBNPKvKibnY&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jBNPKvKibnY&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="500" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Again, Microsoft&#8217;s sponsorship of the show means that it will air commercial-free. Let&#8217;s hope the final version makes sitting through 30 minutes of this actually tolerable. [<a href="http://www.win741.com/">win741</a> via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/10/sneak-peek-family-guy-meets-windows-7.ars">Ars Technica</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/family-guy-windows-7-clip-isnt-all-that-exciting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Guy And Microsoft Team Up For Hackiest Ever Hackathon</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/family-guy-and-microsoft-team-up-for-hackiest-ever-hackathon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/family-guy-and-microsoft-team-up-for-hackiest-ever-hackathon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family guy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seth macfarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hack-tacular comedy murderer Seth MacFarlane is teaming up with Microsoft to create a commercial-free, partly live-action special in which the Windows 7 brand-name will be integrated into the show&#8217;s content. Commercials might actually have improved this idea.
The show, which will have some live-action performances of the unbearable musical numbers featured in MacFarlane&#8217;s animated sitcoms, will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/60.jpg" alt="" class="left" />Hack-tacular comedy murderer Seth MacFarlane is teaming up with Microsoft to create a commercial-free, partly live-action special in which the Windows 7 brand-name will be integrated into the show&#8217;s content. Commercials might actually have improved this idea.<span id="more-360192"></span></p>
<p>The show, which will have some live-action performances of the unbearable musical numbers featured in MacFarlane&#8217;s animated sitcoms, will supposedly &#8220;feature unique Windows 7-branded programming that blends seamlessly with show content.&#8221; In case you don&#8217;t remember, or are lucky enough to have repressed this memory, MacFarlane actually teamed up with a giant corporate sponsor once before, and it led to humour abortions like this:</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y57XT9flVfA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y57XT9flVfA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308"></object></p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s not totally clear how Windows 7 will be integrated into the special (tentatively named &#8220;Family Guy Presents: Seth &amp; Alex&#8217;s Almost Live Comedy Show&#8221;), but based on the Burger King disaster, it might not be much more than a half-hearted mention here and there and a few &#8220;this isn&#8217;t a commercial&#8221; commercials in between sketches. [<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2009/oct09/10-13mswin7foxpr.mspx">Microsoft</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/family-guy-and-microsoft-team-up-for-hackiest-ever-hackathon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
