<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; time warner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/time-warner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>65,000 Time Warner Customers Exposed To Remote Hacks</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/65000-time-warner-customers-exposed-to-remote-hacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/65000-time-warner-customers-exposed-to-remote-hacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner exposed routers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability in their modems and routers has left 65,000 Time Warner customers vulnerable to having their admin menus remotely accessed by evil-doers. Time Warner says they&#8217;re aware of, and working on the issue as we type. [Wired]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/thumb160x_routers.jpg" alt="" class="left" />A vulnerability in their modems and routers has left 65,000 Time Warner customers vulnerable to having their admin menus remotely accessed by evil-doers. Time Warner says they&#8217;re aware of, and working on the issue as we type. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/time-warner-cable/">Wired</a>]<span id="more-361555"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/65000-time-warner-customers-exposed-to-remote-hacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chart Of The Day: Google&#8217;s Massive Cash Flow In Context II</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/chart-of-the-day-googles-massive-cash-flow-in-context-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/chart-of-the-day-googles-massive-cash-flow-in-context-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Business Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google turned in another solid quarter yesterday, with free cash flow coming in at $US2.5 billion. Think about it: that&#8217;s a $US10 billion run rate for a company that didn&#8217;t exist 10 years ago.
How does that stack up to other companies? It&#8217;s still not close to Microsoft, but it&#8217;s pulling away from Time Warner. Here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/google_chart.gif"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_google_chart.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Google <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com//gooogle-goog-q3-earnings-analysis">turned in</a> another solid quarter yesterday, with free cash flow coming in at $US2.5 billion. Think about it: that&#8217;s a $US10 billion run rate for a company that didn&#8217;t exist 10 years ago.<span id="more-360926"></span></p>
<p>How does that stack up to other companies? It&#8217;s still not close to Microsoft, but it&#8217;s pulling away from Time Warner. Here&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-googles-growing-cash-flow-2009-4">update from our April chart</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/thumb160x_40b73624ed47a836c6882a101c6c7e92.gif" alt="" class="left" /></a></p>
<p><i>Note</i>: We&#8217;ve used analyst estimates for Q3 for Microsoft and Time Warner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/chart-of-the-day-googles-massive-cash-flow-in-context-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast Could Be Quietly Preparing Plan To Control Pipes and Content</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/comcast-could-be-quietly-preparing-plan-to-control-pipes-and-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/comcast-could-be-quietly-preparing-plan-to-control-pipes-and-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=346560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tea leaf-reading analysts are speculating this afternoon that Comcast is currently hoarding cash as part of an effort to revisit its 2003 spending spree days. You remember 2003, right? That was the year Comcast made a brash $US54 billion bid for Disney.
Now it appears they&#8217;re at it again, although what the target(s) will be this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tea leaf-reading analysts are speculating this afternoon that Comcast is currently hoarding cash as part of an effort to revisit its 2003 spending spree days. You remember 2003, right? That was the year Comcast made a brash $US54 billion bid for Disney.<span id="more-346560"></span></p>
<p>Now it appears they&#8217;re at it again, although what the target(s) will be this time around is anybody&#8217;s guess. A few of the names floated so far are Viacom Inc and Time Warner Inc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s most likely not Disney, said former Disney CEO Michael Eisner. &#8220;They may want to recapture their dreams of going after Disney, but not with Disney specifically,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I am sure [Comcast] Brian Roberts and Steve Burke (COO) have Time Warner high on their computer screens.&#8221;</p>
<p>The analysts, in a word, were wary of such a move. [<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57F1O920090816">Reuters</a> via <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/08/16/1915219/Comcast-Seeking-Control-of-Both-Pipes-and-Content?from=rss">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/comcast-could-be-quietly-preparing-plan-to-control-pipes-and-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL and Time Warner to Break Up</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/aol_and_time_warner_to_break_up-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/aol_and_time_warner_to_break_up-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/aol_and_time_warner_to_break_up-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL and Time Warner will split into two distinct entities by the end of the year. What AOL will do out in the cold without Time Warner&#8217;s blanket, only time will tell. [NYT]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL and Time Warner will split into two distinct entities by the end of the year. What AOL will do out in the cold without Time Warner&#8217;s blanket, only time will tell. [<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/28/splitsville-for-aol-and-time-warner/">NYT</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: business, aol, aol time warner, time warner --><br />
<span id="more-336500"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/aol_and_time_warner_to_break_up-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner Cable To Expand Its Bandwidth Caps To Additional Cities</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/time_warner_cable_to_expand_its_bandwidth_caps_to_additional_cities-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/time_warner_cable_to_expand_its_bandwidth_caps_to_additional_cities-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwisth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/time_warner_cable_to_expand_its_bandwidth_caps_to_additional_cities-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tests of a somewhat-more-draconian-than-normal 40GB monthly download cap in poor little Beaumont, Texas must have gone well for TWC, because they&#8217;re bringing bandwidth caps to more cities this year. Could your town be next?


No one knows yet; all we do know is that TWC COO Landel Hobbs announced intentions to expand the caps to more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/TWC_eye.jpg" style="display:block;" />Tests of a somewhat-more-draconian-than-normal 40GB monthly download cap in poor little Beaumont, Texas must have gone well for TWC, because they&#8217;re <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2009/2/time-warner-cable-bandwidth-caps">bringing bandwidth caps to more cities this year</a>. Could your town be next?</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: broadband, bandwidth, cable, caps, piracy, time warner cable bandwidth caps --><br />
<span id="more-325819"></span>
<p>No one knows yet; all we do know is that TWC COO Landel Hobbs announced intentions to expand the caps to more cities this year.</p>
<p>Dan over at Alley Insider points out that Time Warner&#8217;s strategy doesn&#8217;t appear to only be about stopping hardcore pirates (which a more roomy 250GB cap, like Comcast&#8217;s, is better at)-no, they appear to be going for a new revenue model in which they hit up harder-core users for overage fees. Although if they keep the bar set at 40GB, they might be sticking not just big Torrenters but mum and dad streaming Netflix Watch Instantly, too. Yippee. Don&#8217;t even try this in NYC, Time Warner. [<a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2009/2/time-warner-cable-bandwidth-caps">Alley Insider</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/time_warner_cable_to_expand_its_bandwidth_caps_to_additional_cities-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viacom Might Pull All Channels (Comedy Central, MTV) Off Time Warner Cable Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/viacom_might_pull_all_channels_comedy_central_mtv_off_time_warner_cable_tomorrow-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/viacom_might_pull_all_channels_comedy_central_mtv_off_time_warner_cable_tomorrow-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/viacom_might_pull_all_channels_comedy_central_mtv_off_time_warner_cable_tomorrow-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Viacom wants Time Warner Cable to pay more for its channels, like MTV and Comedy Central. TWC doesn&#8217;t want to pay. So on Jan. 1, they could all go away for TWC subscribers.


Viacom&#8217;s argument is that their channels &#8220;provide 20 percent of their audience&#8221; yet they only &#8220;receive about 2.5 percent of the fees Time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/jonstewart_01.jpg" style="display:block;" />Viacom wants Time Warner Cable to pay more for its channels, like MTV and Comedy Central. TWC doesn&#8217;t want to pay. So on Jan. 1, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/31/business/media/31cable.html">they could all go away</a> for TWC subscribers.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: viacom, comedy central, jon stewart, mtv, nickelodeon, stephen colbert, time warner, time warner cable, vh1 --><br />
<span id="more-321034"></span>
<p>Viacom&#8217;s argument is that their channels &#8220;provide 20 percent of their audience&#8221; yet they only &#8220;receive about 2.5 percent of the fees Time Warner pays,&#8221; so they&#8217;re asking for what amounts to a rate increase of 23 cents per subscriber. Time Warner says that &#8220;the root of this is that the advertising market has gone soft and Viacom is desperate&#8221; and it&#8217;s no time to be making people pay more for TV.</p>
<p>Viacom&#8217;s PR campaign, so far, is decidedly brilliant: They&#8217;ve taken out full page ads in the <em>Times</em> and other papers today with characters like Dora the Explorer crying because children can&#8217;t watch her starting tomorrow. Time Warner&#8217;s response is pretty savvy too. Time Warner spokesman Alexander Dudley said that they&#8217;ll &#8220;be telling our customers exactly where they can go to see these programs online&#8230;We&#8217;ll also be telling them how they can hook up their PCs to a television set.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right&mdash;the cable company will be <em>telling</em> people to use Hulu. That&#8217;s a first. True, they&#8217;re still doing it over Time Warner&#8217;s pipes, but it&#8217;s pretty shocking coming from a cable company/ISP, who, like every other TV/ISP service provider, has traditionally pushed people in various ways to use the internet less and their TV services more. In fact, Time Warner has squawked before <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/29/the-real-fight-over-fake-news/">that they hate the amount of content</a>&mdash;like <em>The Hills</em> and <em>The Daily Show</em>, the very programs at issue here&mdash;that broadcasters are putting online for free. Now they&#8217;re sending people to them.</p>
<p>This is also the same Time Warner that&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/time_warner_monthly_data_caps_detailed-2.html">capping the amount of data</a> people can use a month in certain markets, which, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/welcome_to_the_future_of_broadband_third_major_isp_att_testing_bandwidth_caps_in_the_fall-2.html">survey says</a>, is a <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/comcasts_250gb_data_caps_now_official_starting_in_october-2.html">network management practice likely to spread</a>&mdash;in large part due to the amount of strain on broadband networks <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/10_percent_of_broadband_subscribers_suck_up_80_percent_of_bandwidth_but_p2p_no_longer_to_blame-2.html">coming from streaming video now</a>.</p>
<p>And this Time Warner&#8217;s going to tell people to stream more video? Maybe they&#8217;re just going to bump your broadband bill instead, or this is a bluff. So, don&#8217;t worry guys, you&#8217;ll totally be able to watch Comedy Central while you&#8217;re hungover tomorrow. (Probably.) [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/31/business/media/31cable.html?_r=1">NY Times</a> via <a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/12/31/time-warner-cable-may-take-comedy-central-mtv-nickelodeon-off-the-air/">NewTeeVee</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/viacom_might_pull_all_channels_comedy_central_mtv_off_time_warner_cable_tomorrow-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ogle Cable Guys Between the Hours of Whenever and Anytime</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ogle_cable_guys_between_the_hours_of_whenever_and_anytime-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ogle_cable_guys_between_the_hours_of_whenever_and_anytime-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable guys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ogle_cable_guys_between_the_hours_of_whenever_and_anytime-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#8217;t get enough of your local cable guy and his blue paper booties? Order a Time Warner cable guy calendar.


As the AP report suggests, you&#8217;ve got lots of open-shirted installers posing with cables and flowers as thinly veiled metaphors. In case you were confused, these are actual technicians that are doing the posing, which would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/gal_time-warner_12.jpg" class="center" class="left" />Can&#8217;t get enough of your local cable guy and his blue paper booties? Order a Time Warner cable guy calendar.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: beefcake, cable, cable beefcake calendar, calendar, calendars, time warner --><br />
<span id="more-319181"></span>
<p>As the AP report suggests, you&#8217;ve got lots of open-shirted installers posing with cables and flowers as thinly veiled metaphors. In case you were confused, these are <i>actual</i> technicians that are doing the posing, which would make for a very awkward visit the next time on of the chosen twelve are over at your house. </p>
<p>They&#8217;re free through the website. Somewhere. We couldn&#8217;t find it. [<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081215/ap_on_fe_st/odd_cable_tv_calendar;_ylt=A9G_RoK5yEZJy_EAoArtiBIF">Yahoo</a>]</p>
<p>Plus, <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/12/15/2008-12-15_workers_model_in_fun_time_warner_calenda.html">actual pics here!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/ogle_cable_guys_between_the_hours_of_whenever_and_anytime-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Wants FCC to Make Set-Top Box Ethernet Ports Mandatory</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/intel_wants_fcc_to_make_settop_box_ethernet_ports_mandatory-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/intel_wants_fcc_to_make_settop_box_ethernet_ports_mandatory-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[set-top box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/intel_wants_fcc_to_make_settop_box_ethernet_ports_mandatory-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would be great: Intel reps paid a visit to the FCC to lobby for making ethernet ports a requirement in new set-top boxes, meaning every set-top box would be IP capable. So connectivity like the cable industry&#8217;s tru2way dealio and home networking would go from bustable industry pact to government mandate. Odds of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/eterhetnbox.jpg" style="display:block;" />This would be great: Intel reps paid a visit to the FCC to lobby for making ethernet ports a requirement in new set-top boxes, meaning every set-top box would be IP capable. So connectivity like the cable industry&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/giz_explains_cablecard_and_the_future_of_cable_tv-2.html">tru2way dealio</a> and <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/the_future_of_tv_according_to_att-2.html">home networking</a> would go from bustable industry pact to government mandate. Odds of this happening? Well, there is a precedent like this, and FCC Chairmain Kevin Martin does enjoy <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/fcc_to_force_isps_to_reveal_p2p_blockage_and_real_world_bandwidth_speeds-2.html">stabbing</a> the cable industryin the balls with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/fcc_chairman_kicking_cable_and.html">burning pokers of openness</a>, but nothing&#8217;s certain. [<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080720-intel-asks-fcc-to-mandate-ethernet-ports-for-set-top-boxes.html">Ars</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: fcc, cable, cable industry, comcast, intel, time warner, tru2way --><br />
<span id="more-298391"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/intel_wants_fcc_to_make_settop_box_ethernet_ports_mandatory-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner Monthly Data Caps Detailed</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/time_warner_monthly_data_caps_detailed-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/time_warner_monthly_data_caps_detailed-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/time_warner_monthly_data_caps_detailed-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;d heard about Time Warner Cable&#8217;s test run of consumption-based billing in Beaumont, Texas, back in January, though details were scant. Now they&#8217;re plentiful. The plans (for new subscribers only) start up on Thursday, but thankfully they&#8217;re not as bad as we imagined&#8211;the overage fee is only US$1/GB and is waived the first two months. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/timewarnerchoke.jpg"align="left"/>We&#8217;d heard about Time Warner Cable&#8217;s test run of consumption-based billing in Beaumont, Texas, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/allyoucaneat_broadband_is_dead_time_warner_to_charge_by_the_byte-2.html">back in January</a>, though details were scant. Now they&#8217;re plentiful. The plans (for new subscribers only) start up on Thursday, but thankfully they&#8217;re not as bad as we imagined&#8211;the overage fee is only US$1/GB and is waived the first two months. Plans start US$30 for 768Kbps downloads and a 5GB cap, and go up to US$55 for a pretty sweet 15Mbps downstream and a 40GB cap. Not egregious, but we still hate it, especially since you&#8217;ll probably be seeing this in lotsa places, sooner than you&#8217;d expect.<br />
<blockquote>AU: Seriously? 15Mbps for $55 and 40GB? Where do I sign up? Honestly&#8230; I understand the US frustration, but how bad do we have it down here? Bad&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: broadband, internet, time warner, time warner cable --><br />
<span id="more-291631"></span>
<p>Designed to thwart hardcore data slurpers (and soon HD <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/10_percent_of_broadband_subscribers_suck_up_80_percent_of_bandwidth_but_p2p_no_longer_to_blame-2.html">video downloads</a> that&#8217;ll in time seriously compete with cable&#8217;s offerings), consumption-based billing throws us back to the days AOL&#8211;sure, it&#8217;s more data, but the principle is effectively the same, and it&#8217;ll come to regular consumers sooner than the cable industry would have you believe, especially once online video <em>actually</em> gets rolling. While Time Warner emphasised to us it&#8217;s just a test, we <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/the_future_of_broadband_were_totally_screwed-2.html"> don&#8217;t expect this to stay</a> in Texas for long, especially with <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/comcast_considering_250gb_monthly_data_caps_disconnecting_repeat_pirates-2.html">Comcast mulling over similar plans</a>. Long live <a href="http://blip.tv/file/794871">internet in the US</a>. [<a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080602/tec_time_warner_cable_internet.html?.v=2">Yahoo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/time_warner_monthly_data_caps_detailed-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WiMax Just Might Make It: Sprint&#8217;s WiMax and Clearwire Officially Merge</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/wimax_just_might_make_it_sprints_wimax_and_clearwire_officially_merge-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/wimax_just_might_make_it_sprints_wimax_and_clearwire_officially_merge-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clearwire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/wimax_just_might_make_it_sprints_wimax_and_clearwire_officially_merge-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The massive WiMax joint venture expected to be announced today is official, though the rumoured details were a bit off. Sprint&#8217;s WiMax division is merging with Clearwire to form a single WiMax company called&#8230;Clearwire. (But Sprint will own most of it.) Happily, the clusterfuckiness factor is lower than we figured. Google, Intel, Time Warner and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/voltron_wimax.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none"/>The massive WiMax joint venture <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/rumored_wimax_joint_venture_sprint_clearwire_comcast_and_time_warner_with__from_google_and_intel_maybe_announced_tomorrow-2.html">expected to be announced today</a> is official, though the rumoured details were a bit off. Sprint&#8217;s WiMax division is merging with Clearwire to form a single WiMax company called&#8230;Clearwire. (But Sprint will own most of it.) Happily, the clusterfuckiness factor is lower than we figured. Google, Intel, Time Warner and Comcast are all contributing in ways that actually seem helpful and logical. Here&#8217;s what they&#8217;re gonna do, besides chip in US$3.2 billion, all told.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: clearwire, comcast, gadgets, google, intel, sprint, time warne, wimax, wireless, xohm --><br />
<span id="more-288364"></span>
<p>From the cable companies, you&#8217;ll be seeing some quadruple play action, with them offering WiMax and 3G bundles with their services. For Intel&#8217;s part, they&#8217;ll be pushing WiMax in the Centrino 2 chipsets (as expected). And Google will be leading development of internet and advertising services, in addition to being Sprint&#8217;s new default search on mobile phones. This whole thing is kind of amazing, actually : WiMax has gone from being a sure-fire also-ran to suddenly viable in a matter of weeks. Still a long road ahead, but they&#8217;re in much better shape than it seemed even a week ago.</p>
<blockquote><p>KIRKLAND, Wash. and OVERLAND PARK, Kan. &#8211; May 7, 2008 &#8211; Clearwire Corporation (NASDAQ: CLWR) and Sprint Nextel Corporation (NYSE: S) today announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement to combine their next-generation wireless broadband businesses to form a new wireless communications company.
<p>The new company, which will be named Clearwire, will be focused on expediting the deployment of the first nationwide mobile WiMAX network to provide a true mobile broadband experience for consumers, small businesses, medium and large enterprises, public safety organizations and educational institutions. The new Clearwire expects to dramatically enhance the speed and manner in which customers access all that the Internet has to offer at home, in the office and on the road.</p>
<p>Sprint and Clearwire also announced today that five innovative technology, content and communications leaders<br /> &#8211; Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) through Intel Capital, Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG), Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ: CMSCA, CMCSK), Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC), and Bright House Networks &#8211; have collectively agreed to invest $3.2 billion into the new company. The investment by the five strategic investors will be based on a target price of $20.00 per share of Clearwire&#8217;s common stock, subject to a post-closing adjustment. This adjustment is based upon the trading prices of new Clearwire common stock on the NASDAQ Market over 15 randomly selected trading days during the 30-trading day period ending on the 90th day after the closing date. The price per share will be based upon the volume weighted average price on such days and is subject to a cap of $23.00 per share and a floor of $17.00 per share. In addition, Trilogy Equity Partners, led by wireless veteran John Stanton, will invest directly in the new Clearwire&#8217;s common stock.</p>
<p>Upon completion of the proposed transaction, Sprint will own the largest stake in the new company with approximately 51 percent equity ownership on a fully diluted basis assuming an investment price of $20.00 per share. The existing Clearwire shareholders will own approximately 27 percent and the new strategic investors, as a group, will be acquiring approximately 22 percent for their investment of $3.2 billion, both on a fully diluted basis assuming an investment price of $20.00 per share.</p>
<p>Sprint and Clearwire also announced a series of commercial agreements with the strategic investors, including 3G and 4G wholesale agreements.</p>
<p>&#8220;For Sprint shareholders, this is an opportunity to unlock and bring visibility to the value of our significant spectrum assets, technology and expertise, by leveraging the technology, applications and distribution strengths of our investors, who together command nearly a half- trillion dollars in market capitalization,&#8221; said Dan Hesse, president and chief executive officer of Sprint. &#8220;We&#8217;ve made an excellent start developing XOHM WiMAX services. Contributing those advances to a strongly backed new company &#8211; in which we&#8217;ll hold the largest interest &#8211; provides Sprint with additional financial flexibility and allows Sprint management to leverage and focus on our core business.</p>
<p>&#8220;Additionally, the agreements allowing the new company and our cable company investors to bundle and resell Sprint&#8217;s third-generation wireless services strengthen the distribution of our current services while reducing the complexity and enhancing Sprint&#8217;s cable relationships,&#8221;Hesse added.</p>
<p>Clearwire Chairman Craig O. McCaw, said, &#8220;The power of the mobile Internet, which offers speed and mobility, home and away, on any device or screen, will fundamentally transform the communications landscape in our country. We believe that the new Clearwire will operate one of the fastest and most capable broadband wireless networks ever conceived, giving us the opportunity to return the U.S. to a leadership position in the global wireless industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Benjamin G. Wolff, chief executive officer of Clearwire, said, &#8220;The combination of robust next-generation mobile WiMAX technology and nationwide spectrum that we believe is optimal for delivering mobile broadband services &#8211; coupled with substantial new financial resources, a team of experienced wireless industry veterans, and distribution and technology agreements with some of our nation&#8217;s leading communications, technology and content companies &#8211; creates what I believe to be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given the complexity of this transaction, we have taken the time and effort to do it right, by thoughtfully leveraging the resources and opportunities that we and our investors are bringing to the table. This transaction is tremendous news for the entire Clearwire team &#8211; our shareholders, our customers and our employee-partners, and we look forward to partnering with the talented team from XOHM to achieve our shared vision,&#8221; Wolff added.<br /> The strategic investors are among the nation&#8217;s leaders in communications technology, chipset development and Internet advertising, content and distribution. It is expected that the new Clearwire will have a time-to-market advantage over competitors in fourth-generation services, supported by strong spectrum holdings and a national footprint. Further, it will build on the strong foundation of Clearwire&#8217;s rapidly growing subscriber base of nearly 400,000 wireless broadband customers as of year-end 2007, as well as Sprint&#8217;s continued XOHM WiMAX network build-out in certain markets throughout this year.</p>
<p>&#8220;This agreement is a historic step forward for WiMAX as it represents the first nationwide deployment of a next-generation mobile broadband Internet in the U.S.,&#8221; said Paul Otellini, Intel president and CEO. &#8220;The agreement also signifies growing industry support for WiMAX. Given its flexibility, coverage and speed, WiMAX will enable the mobile Internet and is already opening doors to a host of new and exciting applications, devices and business models around the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Google is a firm believer in supporting new ways for people to access the Internet,&#8221; said Eric Schmidt, chief executive officer and chairman of Google. &#8220;We are proud to invest in the new Clearwire alongside several leading technology and communications companies, and we believe that its planned WiMAX network will increase the ability for users to get high-speed broadband anytime, anywhere.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This is a great coalition of innovative companies that have joined together to create the next generation of mobile wireless products. It is exciting to be on the ground floor of this new venture that we believe will create unprecedented high-speed wireless products and make them available across the nation,&#8221; said Brian L. Roberts, chairman and chief executive officer of Comcast Corporation. &#8220;This transaction is attractive to us strategically and financially and puts in place very attractive wholesale relationships for access to Sprint&#8217;s existing 3G and Clearwire&#8217;s 4G networks, giving us complete flexibility to introduce wireless mobility in terms of product innovation and deployment.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This exciting new venture enables Time Warner Cable to help shape the next generation of wireless services in ways that will complement and enhance our products and services,&#8221; said Glenn Britt, Time Warner Cable&#8217;s president and chief executive officer. &#8220;We&#8217;re committed to giving our customers more control over how and where they can easily connect to what&#8217;s important to them &#8211; entertainment, information, and each other. The agreem<br />
ents we&#8217;re announcing today are a financially prudent way for us to add mobility to our offerings when our customers demand it.&#8221;</p>
<p> &#8220;We are pleased to join our fellow cable operators as well as the new technology and wireless investors in this strategic venture. This broadband wireless relationship will help us to continue to provide the best possible competitive services for our customers, today and in the future. It is consistent with our commitment to delivering customers the products and services that they desire, whenever and wherever they want,&#8221; said Robert J. Miron, chairman and chief executive officer of Bright House Networks.</p>
<p>The new Clearwire expects to offer mobile wireless Internet services on a broad array of new devices that will be made possible by integrated WiMAX chipsets, scalable operating expenses and a commitment to an open architecture.</p>
<p>Mobile WiMAX is a standards-based wireless broadband technology designed to operate multiple times faster than today&#8217;s 3G wireless networks. With embedded WiMAX chipsets in laptops, phones, PDAs, mobile Internet devices and consumer electronic equipment, mobile WiMAX technology is expected to allow users to wirelessly access a range of multimedia applications, such as live videoconferencing, recorded video, games, large data files and more &#8211; anywhere in the network coverage area.</p>
<p>The transaction has been approved by all of the parties&#8217; boards of directors, and is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2008. The transaction is subject to various closing conditions including, but not limited to, the approval of Clearwire&#8217;s stockholders, and receipt of regulatory approvals, including the approval of the Federal Communications Commission and clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act.<br /> Governance</p>
<p>The new Clearwire&#8217;s board of directors will be comprised initially of 13 members, including seven directors to be named by Sprint of whom at least one will be independent; four named by the strategic investors of whom at least one will be independent; one named by Eagle River, the private investment company controlled by wireless pioneer Craig O. McCaw; and one independent member to be nominated by the new company&#8217;s Nominating Committee.</p>
<p>The parties currently expect Craig McCaw to serve as non-executive chairman of the board. Along with McCaw, other directors expected to serve for an initial one-year term as new Clearwire board members are Dan Hesse, Sprint&#8217;s president and CEO, Brian Roberts, Comcast&#8217;s chairman and CEO, and Glenn Britt, Time Warner Cable&#8217;s president and CEO. In addition, John Stanton, chairman and CEO of Trilogy Equity Partners and former chairman and CEO of VoiceStream and Western Wireless, is expected to serve on the board.</p>
<p>Overview of the New Clearwire<br /> The new Clearwire will apply for listing of its common stock on the NASDAQ under the ticker &#8220;CLWR.&#8221; The management team will be led by Benjamin G. Wolff, currently CEO of Clearwire, as the new company&#8217;s CEO and Barry West, currently Sprint&#8217;s Chief Technology Officer and XOHM business unit leader, as president of the new Clearwire. Staffing for the new Clearwire will include the talent from both Clearwire and Sprint&#8217;s XOHM business unit. The headquarters of the new Clearwire will be located in Kirkland, Wash. The new company will continue to have a significant employee presence, including research and development, in Herndon, Va.</p>
<p> The investment by Intel Capital, Google, Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks will be used to advance the development of the new Clearwire&#8217;s mobile WiMAX network. This nationwide footprint is underpinned by the substantial next-generation wireless broadband spectrum portfolio that Sprint and Clearwire collectively hold in the United States. The combined wireless spectrum should allow the new Clearwire to achieve greater coverage, cost and operational efficiencies, and bandwidth-utilization than either company could by operating alone. The new Clearwire is targeting a network deployment that will cover between 120 million and 140 million people in the U.S. by the end of 2010.</p>
<p>In addition to spectrum, Sprint will contribute to the new Clearwire certain hardware, software and all of its WiMAX-based trademarks and other WiMAX-related intellectual property. The new Clearwire expects to materially reduce capital and operating expenditures by leveraging Sprint&#8217;s existing infrastructure, reducing the cost of building out the mobile WiMAX network nationwide. The new Clearwire expects to utilise Sprint&#8217;s towers, fibre network and IT support at favourable bulk rates. Sprint also will realise cost savings for its core business by sharing certain costs of towers and other infrastructure.</p>
<p>The agreements with the strategic investor group define significant new commercial relationships, including:</p>
<p>* Intel will work with manufacturers to embed WiMAX chips into Intel® Centrino® 2 processor technology-based laptops and other Intel-based mobile Internet devices, and will market the new company&#8217;s service in association with Intel&#8217;s performance notebook PC brand.<br /> * Google will partner with the new Clearwire in the development of Internet services, advertising services and applications for mobile WiMAX devices. In addition, Google will be the search provider and a preferred provider of other applications for the new Clearwire&#8217;s retail product.<br /> * Google will partner with the new Clearwire on an open Internet business protocol for mobile broadband devices. The new Clearwire will support Google&#8217;s Android operating system software in its future voice and data devices that it provides to its retail customers.<br /> * Sprint, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Bright House Networks will enter into wholesale agreements with the new Clearwire, becoming 4G providers of new Clearwire&#8217;s mobile WiMAX service.<br /> * Comcast, Time Warner Cable, and Bright House Networks and, after completion of the transactions, the new Clearwire, will enter into 3G wholesale agreements with Sprint, becoming bundled providers of Sprint&#8217;s wireless voice and data services, expanding the reach of Sprint&#8217;s network to more customers, while providing the cable companies a simpler, more effective vehicle to bundle wireless services.<br /> * Sprint and Google have also entered into an agreement related to Sprint&#8217;s mobile services, whereby Google will become the default provider of web and local search services, both of which will be enabled with location information, for Sprint. Sprint will also preload several Google services &#8211; including Google Maps for mobile, Gmail and YouTube &#8211; on select mobile phones and provide easier access to other Google services.<br /> * Google and Intel have options to enter into 3G and 4G wholesale agreements with Clearwire and Sprint respectively and have no current plans to do so.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> [<a href="http://www.sprint.com">Sprint</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/wimax_just_might_make_it_sprints_wimax_and_clearwire_officially_merge-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
