<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; t-mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/t-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why US Wireless Pricing Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/why-u-s-wireless-pricing-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/why-u-s-wireless-pricing-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=367041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times ran a story today that helps explain why the American cellular industry is so screwy. In short: it&#8217;s our fault.
There are two main problems: We like bills to be consistent, and we&#8217;re risk-averse consumers.
To the first point, Sprint tried to offer a plan in 2004 where 300 minutes cost $US35, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/wireless_industry_small.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><em>The New York Times</em> ran a story today that helps explain why the American cellular industry is so screwy. In short: it&#8217;s our fault.<span id="more-367041"></span></p>
<p>There are two main problems: We like bills to be consistent, and we&#8217;re risk-averse consumers.</p>
<p>To the first point, Sprint tried to offer a plan in 2004 where 300 minutes cost $US35, and $US2.50 for each additional 50 minutes. Seems great to me, no outrageous overage charges. But customers didn&#8217;t like it because their bills would vary so much from month-to-month, so Sprint switched back to age-old tiered minutes plans.</p>
<p>Because we like consistent billing, the carriers institute ridiculous overage charges to convince us to spend up. That way we don&#8217;t have to worry about any unforeseen costs, even if the fixed price plan ends up costing more than a variable pricing structure would.</p>
<p>The article also goes into how stupid expensive text message rates are subsidising falling voice revenues, how wireless carriers would love to stop subsidising phones, and more.</p>
<p>I know the average Gizmodo reader would like nothing more than to pay as little per minute as possible, but the average consumer thinks differently.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting is that this wholesale mentality does work, at least in terms of raw pricing. One minute of talk time costs 5c, and the average text message costs 1c. According to the article, that&#8217;s the lowest average pricing in the developed world. The minutes do come at a bulk discount, it&#8217;s just a matter of whether or not you use all of them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave it to you commenters to discuss, but it&#8217;s a good read into how wireless pricing in America got so complicated. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/business/15price.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss">New York Times</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/why-u-s-wireless-pricing-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BlackBerry Bold 9700 Impressions: Small And Chirpy, Like A Black Hummingbird</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BlackBerry Bold 9700 in a word? Compact. It&#8217;s efficient, almost cramped, like a Japanese car from the 80s.
Succinctly, it&#8217;s the new BlackBerry to buy if you&#8217;re on T-Mobile or AT&#38;T. Doubly so on T-Mo, since it&#8217;s their first 3G BlackBerry.
 gawkerGallery(5397352,12,''); It&#8217;s not very much like the original Bold at all, which was the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__088.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bbold9700__088.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/rim-blackberry-bold-9700-onyx-t-mobiles-first-3g-blackberry/">BlackBerry Bold 9700</a> in a word? Compact. It&#8217;s efficient, almost cramped, like a Japanese car from the 80s.<span id="more-364884"></span></p>
<p>Succinctly, it&#8217;s the new BlackBerry to buy if you&#8217;re on T-Mobile or AT&amp;T. Doubly so on T-Mo, since it&#8217;s their first 3G BlackBerry.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5397352,12,''); </script>It&#8217;s not very much like the original Bold at all, which was the Escalade of BlackBerrys: big, obnoxious, but seriously comfortable to drive because it gave you tons of room to spread your legs (err, thumbs). If you&#8217;re used to that, at first the 9700&mdash;which is even smaller and lighter than the Tour on Sprint and Verizon&mdash;feels like you&#8217;ve been shoved inside of a clown car because the keyboard and screen, while retaining the same shape and resolution, respectively, have been shrink-rayed. (Note: In the gallery, the T-Mobile one is the Bold 9700, the AT&amp;T phone is the original Bold.)</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__090.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bbold9700__090.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>But, then you realise you&#8217;re not typing any slower, or less precisely. The 9700&#8217;s keyboard isn&#8217;t as flat out <em>comfortable</em> as the original Bold&mdash;purely a matter of physics&mdash;but it&#8217;s a minor marvel of ergonomics that RIM has recession-sized the keyboard this effectively. They&#8217;re simply brilliant at building keyboards. The screen has the same resolution as the Bold&#8217;s, but in a smaller size, meaning it has a higher pixel density. Despite that extra clarity, I felt a bit constrained by it, especially browsing the web.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the second BlackBerry to ditch all-too-easily-slain-by-lint trackball for an optical trackpad, and the first that&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/blackberry-curve-8520-lightning-review-cheap-not-the-good-kind/">not built for Walmart</a>. You&#8217;ll miss the trackball for about 15 seconds. Like I said before, the trackpad&#8217;s 90 percent as good as the ball. You might miss the physical feedback, and it sometimes doesn&#8217;t totally accurately interpret a diagonal swipe that you know wouldn&#8217;t be a problem with the ball but it&#8217;s good enough, and by far the most accurate and responsive trackpad I&#8217;ve used on a phone.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s running BlackBerry OS 5.0 which isn&#8217;t <em>tons</em> different than the OS that shipped on the original Bold or Curve 8900, but it&#8217;s definitely springier and it has a few brushstrokes of added polish here and there. One place you notice is the browser&mdash;while not as fast as the iPhone 3GS or Android, it has some extra zip to it, and it even sped past the Storm 2 loading pages, despite racing on T-Mobile&#8217;s 3G network vs. Verizon&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Basically, barring any major bugs that pop up over the next couple of days, this is the BlackBerry you probably wanna bug your corporate overlords to handcuff to your pants if you&#8217;re on AT&amp;T or T-Mobile, since it&#8217;ll slide into them easier than any BlackBerry yet. I just hope you enjoy the feel of faux leather. [<a href="http://www.blackberry.com/">BlackBerry</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile HSPA 7.2 Rollout Has Begun</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/t-mobile-hspa-7-2-rollout-has-begun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/t-mobile-hspa-7-2-rollout-has-begun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Golijan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hspa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile hspa 7.2 rollout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least some good news follows T-Mobile&#8217;s recent messes: reports are coming in that users in New Jersey, Chicago, Minnesota, Virginia, and some other areas are getting download speeds above 2+ Mbps, meaning that the HSPA 7.2 rollout has begun.
[Android and Me&#8212;Thanks, Slacker!]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/HSPA_7_2_Wireless.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_HSPA_7_2_Wireless.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>At least some good news follows T-Mobile&#8217;s recent messes: reports are coming in that users in New Jersey, Chicago, Minnesota, Virginia, and some other areas are getting download speeds above 2+ Mbps, meaning that the HSPA 7.2 rollout has begun.<span id="more-364881"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/11/carriers/t-mobile-news/has-the-t-mobile-hspa-7-2-rollout-begun-help-us-find-out/">Android and Me</a>&mdash;<i>Thanks, Slacker!</i>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/t-mobile-hspa-7-2-rollout-has-begun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile UK Gets The HTC Touch HD2 Nov. 9</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/t-mobile-uk-gets-the-htc-touch-hd2-nov-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/t-mobile-uk-gets-the-htc-touch-hd2-nov-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc hd2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc touch hd2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch hd2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=364213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Current rumours suggest the HD2 won&#8217;t arrive in the US until early next year, probably on T-Mobile. But now that T-Mo UK has locked in November 9, will the uber WinMo 6.5 handset arrive sooner than first thought? Update: HD2 launch event in Taipei this week&#8230;
As you can see on the invite, the HD2 will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/htc-hd2-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_htc-hd2-1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Current <a href="http://www.tmonews.com/2009/10/windows-mobile-midnight-madness/">rumours</a> suggest the HD2 won&#8217;t arrive in the US until early <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/htcs-only-interesting-windows-mobile-6-5-phone-not-coming-to-us/">next year</a>, probably on T-Mobile. But now that T-Mo UK has locked in November 9, will the uber <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/WinMo%206.5">WinMo 6.5</a> handset arrive sooner than first thought? Update: HD2 launch event in Taipei this week&#8230;<span id="more-364213"></span></p>
<p>As you can see on the invite, the HD2 will be getting all official like on Wednesday. No doubt we&#8217;ll hear something about U.S availability and pricing then. Stay tuned. [<a href="http://www.t-mobile.co.uk/shop/coming-soon/htc-touch-hd2/detail/av">T-Mobile UK</a> and <a href="http://pocketnow.com/tech-news/htc-hd2-product-launch-on-november-4">PocketNow</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_HTCHD2Event.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/t-mobile-uk-gets-the-htc-touch-hd2-nov-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Android 2.0 Running On T-Mobile G1 Aka HTC Dream</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/video-android-2-0-running-on-t-mobile-g1-aka-htc-dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/video-android-2-0-running-on-t-mobile-g1-aka-htc-dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc dream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile g1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Android 2.0 only came out last week, but the open-source community has already ported it to the T-Mobile G1 / HTC Dream, the first Android phone. Check it out&#8230;

Props go to coder, Akira Harada, for the port but it&#8217;s just a sluggish preview at this point. If you&#8217;re super keen, you can download the code [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_G1Android.jpg" alt="" class="center" /><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/a-visual-guide-to-android-2-0-so-much-nicer/">Android 2.0</a> only came out last week, but the open-source community has already ported it to the T-Mobile G1 / HTC Dream, the first Android phone. Check it out&#8230;<span id="more-363905"></span></p>
<p><object width="570" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ijAgr7v8Mo&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0ijAgr7v8Mo&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="570" height="370"></object></p>
<p>Props go to coder, Akira Harada, for the port but it&#8217;s just a sluggish preview at this point. If you&#8217;re super keen, you can download the code for your G1 <a href="http://ftp.wsisiz.edu.pl/pub/G1/emu-s.zip">here</a>, but you&#8217;re probably better off just watching the video below and waiting for <a href="http://us.gizmodo.com/search/cyanogen">Cyanogen</a> to cook up a fully functional Android 2.0 Éclair ROM. [<a href="http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fandroid.hdblog.it%2F2009%2F10%2F30%2Feclair-2-0-su-htc-dream-video-inside%2F&amp;sl=it&amp;tl=en&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8">HDBlog.it</a> (translated) via <a href="//www.slashgear.com/android-2-0-on-t-mobile-g1-aka-htc-dream-video-3062280/">SlashGear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/video-android-2-0-running-on-t-mobile-g1-aka-htc-dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Ericsson Equinox 3G Clamshell Phone Exclusive To T-Mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/sony-ericsson-equinox-3g-clamshell-phone-exclusive-to-t-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/sony-ericsson-equinox-3g-clamshell-phone-exclusive-to-t-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumbphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equinox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony ericsson equinox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Equinox (aka T707) may be a mid-range quad-band dumbphone&#8230;but it&#8217;s pretty. It&#8217;s got trippy light effects for incoming calls, GPS, 3.2-megapixel camera, FM radio and Bluetooth. A motion sensor also controls certain functions. $US50 (with two-year contract). [T-Mobile]
Size: 93 x 50 x 14.1 mm (approx.)
Weight: 95 grams (approx.)
Available colours: Carbon
(Custom light features come in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/Equinox1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_Equinox1.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>The <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/the_gesture_reading_sony_ericsson_t707_meh_mobile_phone-2/">Equinox</a> (aka <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/sony_ericsson_t707_who_says_more_of_the_same_is_a_bad_thing-2/">T707</a>) may be a mid-range quad-band dumbphone&#8230;but it&#8217;s pretty. It&#8217;s got trippy light effects for incoming calls, GPS, 3.2-megapixel camera, FM radio and Bluetooth. A motion sensor also controls certain functions. $US50 (with two-year contract). [<a href="http://www.t-mobile.com/">T-Mobile</a>]<span id="more-363034"></span></p>
<p><strong>Size:</strong> 93 x 50 x 14.1 mm (approx.)<br />
<strong>Weight:</strong> 95 grams (approx.)<br />
<strong>Available colours:</strong> Carbon<br />
(Custom light features come in Amber, Sapphire, Beryl, Diamond and Amethyst.)<br />
<strong>Main screen:</strong> 2.2-inch (5) QVGA 262K TFT<br />
<strong>Resolution:</strong> 240&#215;320 pixels<br />
<strong>Networks:</strong> GSM/ EDGE 850/900/1800/1900 + HSDPA 2100/1700</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/SonyEricssonEquinox.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_SonyEricssonEquinox.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/sony-ericsson-equinox-3g-clamshell-phone-exclusive-to-t-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hurray, Sidekick Owners, You Can Get Your Contacts Back Now</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/hurray-sidekick-owners-you-can-get-your-contacts-back-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/hurray-sidekick-owners-you-can-get-your-contacts-back-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=361423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s edition of the &#8220;steady progress&#8221; being made in recovering the data lost in the Great Sidekick Out(r)age of 2009, contacts&#8212;and just contacts&#8212;are back, after you run a retrieval tool. The rest&#8217;s coming! Eventually? [Yahoo]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>In today&#8217;s edition of the &#8220;<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/microsoft-making-steady-progress-on-sidekick-data-recovery/">steady progress</a>&#8221; being made in recovering the data lost in the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/t-mobile-sidekick-data-outrage-update-data-probably-lost-for-good/">Great Sidekick Out(r)age of 2009</a>, contacts&mdash;and just contacts&mdash;are back, after you run a retrieval tool. The rest&#8217;s coming! Eventually? [<a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20091020/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_t_mobile_sidekick_data_recovery">Yahoo</a>]<span id="more-361423"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/hurray-sidekick-owners-you-can-get-your-contacts-back-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Most, If Not All&#8221; Sidekick Data Recovered</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/most-if-not-all-sidekick-data-recovered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/most-if-not-all-sidekick-data-recovered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like the Sidekick data fiasco is finally coming to an end. Over on T-Mobile&#8217;s Sidekick forums, an official Microsoft statement confirms &#8220;most, if not all, customer data&#8221; will return &#8220;as soon as possible&#8221;, starting with personal contacts.
The statement goes on to say they will &#8220;work around the clock to restore data to all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a>It looks like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com.au/tags/sidekick">Sidekick data fiasco</a> is finally coming to an end. Over on T-Mobile&#8217;s Sidekick forums, an official Microsoft statement confirms &#8220;most, if not all, customer data&#8221; will return &#8220;as soon as possible&#8221;, starting with personal contacts.<span id="more-360499"></span></p>
<p>The statement goes on to say they will &#8220;work around the clock to restore data to all affected users, including calendar, notes, tasks, photographs and high scores, as quickly as possible&#8221;.</p>
<p>The data loss was apparently caused by a system failure that created data loss in the core database and the back-up. I&#8217;m not sure if that means <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-cause-of-the-great-sidekick-fiasco-%e2%80%9call-signs-point-to-sabotage%e2%80%9d/">sabotage</a> or not.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, we now hear that a number of pissed off users have <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10375240-56.html">filed lawsuits</a>. Maybe this isn&#8217;t the end to this after all. [<a href="http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/?category.id=Sidekick">T-Mobile</a>]</p>
<blockquote><p> Dear T-Mobile Sidekick customers,<br />
On behalf of Microsoft, I want to apologise for the recent problems with the Sidekick service and give you an update on the steps we have taken to resolve these problems.</p>
<p>We are pleased to report that we have recovered most, if not all, customer data for those Sidekick customers whose data was affected by the recent outage. We plan to begin restoring users&#8217; personal data as soon as possible, starting with personal contacts, after we have validated the data and our restoration plan. We will then continue to work around the clock to restore data to all affected users, including calendar, notes, tasks, photographs and high scores, as quickly as possible.</p>
<p>We now believe that data loss affected a minority of Sidekick users. If your Sidekick account was among those affected, please continue to log into these forums for the latest updates about when data restoration will begin, and any steps you may need to take. We will work with T-Mobile to post the next update on data restoration timing no later than Saturday.</p>
<p>We have determined that the outage was caused by a system failure that created data loss in the core database and the back-up. We rebuilt the system component by component, recovering data along the way. This careful process has taken a significant amount of time, but was necessary to preserve the integrity of the data.</p>
<p>We will continue working closely with T-Mobile to restore user data as quickly as possible. We are eager to deliver the level of reliable service that our incredibly loyal customers have become accustomed to, and we are taking immediate steps to help ensure this does not happen again. Specifically, we have made changes to improve the overall stability of the Sidekick Service and initiated a more resilient backup process to ensure that the integrity of our database backups is maintained.</p>
<p>Once again, we apologise for this situation and the inconvenience that it has created. Please know that we are working all-out to resolve this situation and restore the reliability of the service.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Roz Ho<br />
Corporate Vice President<br />
Premium Mobile Experiences, Microsoft Corporation</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/most-if-not-all-sidekick-data-recovered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumour: T-Mobile Project Black Isn&#8217;t A Phone &#8212; It&#8217;s A Rescue Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/rumour-t-mobile-project-black-isnt-a-phone-its-a-rescue-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/rumour-t-mobile-project-black-isnt-a-phone-its-a-rescue-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This unconfirmed memo is what Project Black isn&#8217;t: A phone. It claims Black is a turnaround plan with &#8220;blazing speeds&#8221; &#8220;3x&#8221; the competition and phones from hot makers (&#8221;Nokia #1 and Samsung #2&#8243;). WTF.
All the employees who received the information were required to sign confidentiality agreements. Each sector has received it at different times, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/T-Mobile-Project-Dark-Project-Black-header-image.jpg" alt="" class="left" />This <a href="http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/10/14/t-mobile-project-dark-project-black-insider-details-obtained-by-tfts-project-darkproject-black-is-the-term-for-a-company-turnaround-says-our-source/">unconfirmed memo</a> is what Project Black isn&#8217;t: A phone. It claims Black is a turnaround plan with &#8220;blazing speeds&#8221; &#8220;3x&#8221; the competition and phones from hot makers (&#8221;Nokia #1 and Samsung #2&#8243;). WTF.<span id="more-360377"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>All the employees who received the information were required to sign confidentiality agreements. Each sector has received it at different times, the bulk of them actually received it the 13th, after most of the information was already leaked (Although it&#8217;s not entirely accurate…) That said, the Project Dark is not any ONE thing..its a term for a company TURNAROUND; Last to First is what some like to say. It&#8217;s an all inclusive &#8220;package&#8221; that includes blazing speeds, 3 times faster than anyone will have on the market for years. Phones people actually WANT, using top of the line models from the top 2 mobile phone manufacturers in the world (Nokia #1, and Samsung #2). Hot software like Android. And European priced packages.</p>
<p>And all of this will make Verizon, AT&amp;T, and Sprint&#8217;s head spin when its released faster than anyone can have time to finishing reading any official press releases.</p>
<p>330 Million in new networks Verizon? Try nearly 10 billion.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> First of all, assuming this email is real, I don&#8217;t want&mdash;and I am guessing you don&#8217;t want&mdash;any Nokia or Samsung handset. Second of all, I doubt that TMO of all companies can deliver speeds that fast, either. But suppose it&#8217;s true. Then what&#8217;s that &#8220;10 billion&#8221; number at the end for? Femtocells everywhere? Who knows! It&#8217;s a rumour! You&#8217;re not supposed to know yet!</p>
<p>[<a href="http://nexus404.com/Blog/2009/10/14/t-mobile-project-dark-project-black-insider-details-obtained-by-tfts-project-darkproject-black-is-the-term-for-a-company-turnaround-says-our-source/">Nexus404</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/rumour-t-mobile-project-black-isnt-a-phone-its-a-rescue-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cause Of The Sidekick Fiasco? “All Signs Point To Sabotage”</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-cause-of-the-great-sidekick-fiasco-%e2%80%9call-signs-point-to-sabotage%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-cause-of-the-great-sidekick-fiasco-%e2%80%9call-signs-point-to-sabotage%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past week&#8217;s Sidekick data disaster was so extraordinary, you would think that either T-mobile or Microsoft would issue an explanation. There&#8217;s one insider who might have the reason why one hasn&#8217;t come yet: it was an inside job.
An anonymous tipster with seemingly extensive knowledge about the Danger/Pink team has this to say to Apple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_500x_500x_sidekicklxsmall.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>This past week&#8217;s Sidekick data disaster was so extraordinary, you would think that either T-mobile or Microsoft would issue an explanation. There&#8217;s one insider who might have the reason why one hasn&#8217;t come yet: it was an inside job.<span id="more-360189"></span></p>
<p>An anonymous tipster with seemingly extensive knowledge about the Danger/Pink team has this to say to Apple Insider as to what caused the massive data outage:<div class="clear-fix"></div></p>
<blockquote><p> &#8230;someone with access to the servers at the datacenter must have inserted a time bomb to wipe out not just all of the data, but also all of the backup tapes, and finally, I suspect, reformatting the server hard drives so that the service itself could not be restarted with a simple reboot (and to erase any traces of the time bomb itself)&#8230; If this was an ordinary sort of failure, the service would have come back within a day, so once again, all signs point to sabotage.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> After all the reports we&#8217;ve been hearing about the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/microsofts-project-pink-might-have-killed-the-sidekick-for-good/">troubled state of the Danger/Pink team</a>, it&#8217;s certainly plausible that there are more than a few disgruntled employees who could cause such a catastrophic failure. Whether or not anyone would is another question, but this whole thing is so waaaay out of the ordinary, I&#8217;m willing to believe it. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/12/microsofts_sidekick_pink_problems_blamed_on_dogfooding_and_sabotage.html">Apple Insider</a> via <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/chris-dannen/techwatch/microsoft-sidekick-team-bunch-clueless-idiots">Fast Company</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/the-cause-of-the-great-sidekick-fiasco-%e2%80%9call-signs-point-to-sabotage%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
