<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; sun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/sun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Licensing Issues Behind Decision To Kill Snow Leopard ZFS Plans</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/licensing-issues-at-heart-of-apples-decision-to-kill-snow-leopard-zfs-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/licensing-issues-at-heart-of-apples-decision-to-kill-snow-leopard-zfs-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zfs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the OpenSolaris forums, by way of Daring Fireball&#8217;s John Gruber, comes word this morning that Apple&#8217;s decision to remove ZFS support from Snow Leopard was based on licensing issues.
Specifically, Apple may have wanted a &#8220;private license&#8221; from Sun Microsystems, and Sun simply did not want to play ball. Neither side could agree on suitable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the OpenSolaris forums, by way of Daring Fireball&#8217;s <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">John Gruber</a>, comes word this morning that Apple&#8217;s decision to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-kills-zfs-plans-for-snow-leopard/">remove ZFS support from Snow Leopard</a> was based on licensing issues.<span id="more-362595"></span></p>
<p>Specifically, Apple may have wanted a &#8220;private license&#8221; from Sun Microsystems, and Sun simply did not want to play ball. Neither side could agree on suitable terms, so support was removed. [<a href="http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-October/033125.html">OpenSolaris Mailing List</a> via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/">Daring Fireball</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/licensing-issues-at-heart-of-apples-decision-to-kill-snow-leopard-zfs-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Kills ZFS Plans For Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-kills-zfs-plans-for-snow-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-kills-zfs-plans-for-snow-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[btrfs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zfs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t hold your breath for the ZFS filesystem to appear in any future Snow Leopard updates. A message yesterday on the project&#8217;s homepage very clearly acknowledges that development has stopped completely.
A message on MacOS Forge tersely states,
 The ZFS project has been discontinued. The mailing list and repository will also be removed shortly.

 There have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/snowkitty.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_snowkitty.jpg" alt="" class="right" /></a>Don&#8217;t hold your breath for the ZFS filesystem to appear in any future Snow Leopard updates. A message yesterday on the project&#8217;s homepage very clearly acknowledges that development has stopped completely.<span id="more-362574"></span></p>
<p>A message on MacOS Forge tersely states,</p>
<blockquote><p> The ZFS project has been discontinued. The mailing list and repository will also be removed shortly.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> There have been multiple explanations as to <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/why-did-apple-drop-zfs-from-snow-leopard/">why Apple dropped ZFS support</a> in Snow Leopard, and now there&#8217;s more speculation to add into the mix. This time the story goes that when Oracle bought Sun, Oracle didn&#8217;t want continue development on ZFS because they already had their own filesystem (BTRFS) in the oven.</p>
<p>ZFS was also apparently facing patent suits at the time. It all sounds like a complicated legal and political mess, which is probably why Apple just dropped it.</p>
<p>Whatever the true causes behind ZFS&#8217; sudden fall from grace may be, it&#8217;s disappointing that we&#8217;ll have to wait longer for a true filesystem upgrade in OS X. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/10/23/apple_shuts_down_zfs_open_source_project.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-kills-zfs-plans-for-snow-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latestbuy&#8217;s Power Pouch Has A Million Gadget Plugs</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/latestbuys-power-pouch-has-a-million-gadget-plugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/latestbuys-power-pouch-has-a-million-gadget-plugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Broughall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latestbuy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power pouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar chargers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=345028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, maybe not a million, but it probably has a plug for your portable gadget, whatever that may be.
The Power pouch from Latestbuy is a solar panel-packing pouch that incorporates a portable battery and a million different little plugs. You can plug your gadget directly into the sunlight scraping juice pack and charge using the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://media.gizmodo.com.au/wp//2009/08/powp-350a.jpg" alt="powp-350a" title="powp-350a" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-345031" />Well, maybe not a million, but it probably has a plug for your portable gadget, whatever that may be.<span id="more-345028"></span></p>
<p>The Power pouch from Latestbuy is a solar panel-packing pouch that incorporates a portable battery and a million different little plugs. You can plug your gadget directly into the sunlight scraping juice pack and charge using the sun, or you can plug your gadget into the included battery, which you conveniently didn&#8217;t forget to charge using the solar panel back when it was sunny.</p>
<p>If you do happen to forget to charge the battery though, it can be charged via USB as well.</p>
<p>Included in the charging adapters are:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mobile phone adaptors for: LG, Motorola, Nokia (thin &#038; standard plug), Samsung, Sony Ericsson (wide &#038; standard plug) and iPhone.</p>
<p>4 mm straight jack for: Sony PSP, Tom Tom GPS, digital cameras, PDAs and two-way radios.</p>
<p>USB female socket for: iPods, MP3 players, PDAs and GPS systems.</p>
<p>Mini-B USB male plug for: charging the portable battery via USB and for connecting other devices that also use a Mini-B USB connection.
</p></blockquote>
<p>And the best part is that unlike the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/powertraveller_bringing_the_juice_to_australia/">Powertraveller</a>, which offers the same sort of functionality, this thing is cheap. Like $50 cheap. But considering all the free juice you&#8217;ll get, that&#8217;s a bargain and a half, right?</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.latestbuy.com.au/power-pouch-solar-charger.html">Latestbuy</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/08/latestbuys-power-pouch-has-a-million-gadget-plugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Paper Reports iPhone Worker Not Tortured, Told Foxconn To Search His House</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/chinese-paper-reports-iphone-worker-not-tortured-told-foxconn-to-search-his-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/chinese-paper-reports-iphone-worker-not-tortured-told-foxconn-to-search-his-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danyong']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foxconn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foxconn suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hon hai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone leak death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone leak suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=342755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Yorker reports Chinese paper Southern Daily claims they&#8217;ve seen surveillance footage of Sun Danyong&#8217;s interrogation by Foxconn, which show that he wasn&#8217;t locked up or tortured. It also says that Sun told Foxconn to search his house.
The latter report is the more interesting of the two, for the glimpse it gives into Foxconn&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/504x_sun.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/07/504x_504x_sun.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>The <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2009/07/iphone-suicide.html">New Yorker reports</a> Chinese paper <em>Southern Daily</em> claims they&#8217;ve <a href="http://news.qq.com/a/20090723/000450_2.htm">seen surveillance footage</a> of Sun Danyong&#8217;s interrogation by Foxconn, which show that he wasn&#8217;t locked up or tortured. It <a href="http://news.qq.com/a/20090723/000450_1.htm">also says</a> that Sun <em>told</em> Foxconn to search his house.<span id="more-342755"></span></p>
<p>The latter report is the more interesting of the two, for the glimpse it gives into Foxconn&#8217;s corporate culture: When Foxconn security manager Gu Qinming interviewed Sun, he says that Sun initially blamed the missing phone on a female colleague, provoking Gu to poke him in the shoulder and ask, &#8220;Are you a man?&#8221;</p>
<p>According to Gu, it was Sun who suggested that Foxconn search his house, to prove his innocence. Which almost sounds reasonable, insofar as Gu thought Sun was both incompetent and a liar&mdash;what else could Sun have done?</p>
<p>Granted, this is coming from the guy who interrogated and may have tortured Sun Danyong before his death and works for a company so secretive it might <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/death-by-iphone-apple-and-chinas-cultural-time-bomb/">have driven a man to suicide over a phone</a>. [<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2009/07/iphone-suicide.html">The New Yorker</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/chinese-paper-reports-iphone-worker-not-tortured-told-foxconn-to-search-his-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASA Kills Ulysses Spacecraft After 18 Years Of Studying The Sun</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/nasa-kills-ulysses-spacecraft-after-18-years-of-studying-the-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/nasa-kills-ulysses-spacecraft-after-18-years-of-studying-the-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jpl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ulysses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=340065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You thought the leaden winter would bring you down forever / But you rode upon a steamer to the violence of the Sun.
After 18 years of operation, NASA has switched off Ulysses, the space probe designed to study the properties of solar wind, the heliosphere magnetic field, and the solar radio bursts that can greatly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/07/solong.jpg" alt="" class="left" />You thought the leaden winter would bring you down forever / But you rode upon a steamer to the violence of the Sun.<span id="more-340065"></span></p>
<p>After 18 years of operation, NASA has switched off Ulysses, the space probe designed to study the properties of solar wind, the heliosphere magnetic field, and the solar radio bursts that can greatly affect our gadgets, telecommunications, and every electronic system here on planet Earth. It was the first object to see and study our Sun&#8217;s poles.</p>
<p>But Ulysses it&#8217;s not dead yet, at least in spirit. If it gets lucky, it may depart to reach other stars: According to NASA, if it gets close enough to a Jovian moon, Ulysses will jump into a new course that will lead the brave probe into deep space. That certainly would be the perfect destination for a spacecraft that has provided with such an amazing amount of data about our home star. So long, Ulysses, and please say hello to Aphrodite if you see her riding her crimson shell. [<a href="http://ulysses.jpl.nasa.gov/">NASA</a>]</p>
<p><object width="502" height="309"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-BGlFsf9DM8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-BGlFsf9DM8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309"></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/07/nasa-kills-ulysses-spacecraft-after-18-years-of-studying-the-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game Over For Sun&#8217;s &#8220;Game Changing&#8221; 16-Core Rock CPU</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/game-over-for-suns-game-changing-16-core-rock-cpu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/game-over-for-suns-game-changing-16-core-rock-cpu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canceled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock chip canceled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun microsystems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=338036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of their buyout by Oracle, Sun Microsystems has canned their 16-core Rock chip project&#8212;once touted by the company as a &#8220;game changer,&#8221; and their answer to IBM&#8217;s latest Power CPUs&#8212;after five years of development. This represents the second major chip offering from Sun to be shelved in recent years. [NYT]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of their <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/why_oracle_bought_sun_microsystems_for_74_billion-2/">buyout by Oracle</a>, Sun Microsystems has canned their 16-core Rock chip project&mdash;once touted by the company as a &#8220;game changer,&#8221; and their answer to IBM&#8217;s latest Power CPUs&mdash;after five years of development. This represents the second major chip offering from Sun to be shelved in recent years. [<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/15/sun-is-said-to-cancel-big-chip-project/?scp=2&amp;sq=Sun&amp;st=cse">NYT</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/game-over-for-suns-game-changing-16-core-rock-cpu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>K3 Harnesses the Power of the Sun, the Wind, and the Electric Grid</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/k3_harnesses_the_power_of_the_sun_the_wind_and_the_electric_grid-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/k3_harnesses_the_power_of_the_sun_the_wind_and_the_electric_grid-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windmills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/k3_harnesses_the_power_of_the_sun_the_wind_and_the_electric_grid-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Kinesis K3 power generator updates their previous K2 unit with a new power source: In addition to its windmill and solar cells, it can now charge its internal battery with external electricity sources.


Sounds a bit weird and anti-green, but for some reason now you can charge its 4,000 mAh battery using a USB adaptor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/04/custom_1240579016734_inhabitatk3-ed01.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The Kinesis K3 power generator updates <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/kinesis_k2_puts_solar_and_wind_charging_power_in_a_handheld_unit-2.html">their previous K2 unit</a> with a new power source: In addition to its <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/this_thing_is_just_too_big_to_be_true-2.html">windmill</a> and solar cells, it can now charge its internal battery with external electricity sources.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: power, electricity, energy, kinesis k2, kinesis k3, power generator, solar power, sun, wind, wind power, windmill --><br />
<span id="more-334910"></span>
<p>Sounds a bit weird and anti-green, but for some reason now you can charge its 4,000 mAh battery using a USB adaptor or a car cigarette lighter. Why would you like to do a single charge with an external power source when you can just leave it by the window to have it fully charged is beyond me.</p>
<p>According to the company, one hour of sun and wind will provide you with 30 minutes of talk time in a mobile phone. Fully charged, the K3 can load the battery cells for an average mobile phone five times, or an MP3 player more than ten times.</p>
<p>At $US100 it is a bit on the expensive, but if their specs are correct, it looks pretty useful for emergencies. [<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10225299-1.html?part=rss&#038;tag=feed&#038;subj=Crave">CNET</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/k3_harnesses_the_power_of_the_sun_the_wind_and_the_electric_grid-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sun Storing The Entire Internet In a Shipping Container</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/sun_storing_the_entire_internet_in_a_shipping_container-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/sun_storing_the_entire_internet_in_a_shipping_container-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping containers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/sun_storing_the_entire_internet_in_a_shipping_container-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
How do you store three petabytes (that&#8217;s 3,145,728 GB) of web pages for the Internet Archive? You put them in a datacenter housed in a shipping container.


Each container packs in 60 of the company&#8217;s Sun Fire X4500 Open Storage Systems and is constantly monitored for potential threats. It&#8217;s actually a pretty elegant, modular solution to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/sun-internet-in-a-box.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>How do you store three petabytes (that&#8217;s 3,145,728 GB) of web pages for the Internet Archive? You put them in a datacenter housed in a shipping container.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: storage, data center, datacenter, internet, internet archive, shipping container, sun, sun microsystems --><br />
<span id="more-332225"></span>
<p>Each container packs in 60 of the company&#8217;s Sun Fire X4500 Open Storage Systems and is constantly monitored for potential threats. It&#8217;s actually a pretty elegant, modular solution to an archive that grows by nearly 100TBs every month. So rest assured folks, your precious GeoCities page from the 90&#8217;s is safe and secure. [<a href="http://www.sun.com/featured-articles/2009-0325/feature/index.jsp">Sun</a> via <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/03/25/sun-crams-the-entire-internet-in-a-box/">GigaOM</a> via <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/sun-store-the-internet-in-a-box-2638966/">Slashgear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/sun_storing_the_entire_internet_in_a_shipping_container-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBM Wants Sun for $US7 Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/ibm_wants_sun_for_7_billion-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/ibm_wants_sun_for_7_billion-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/ibm_wants_sun_for_7_billion-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sun&#8212;once a bright star in the technology universe, who even wanted to buy Apple&#8212;is about to get swallowed by IBM for $US7 billion, say New York Times&#8217; sources. [NYT]


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/ibm-sun.jpg" alt="" />
<p>Sun&mdash;once a bright star in the technology universe, who even wanted to buy Apple&mdash;is about to get swallowed by IBM for $US7 billion, say New York Times&#8217; sources. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/19/technology/companies/19sun.html?_r=2&#038;ref=technology">NYT</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: rumor, buyout, ibm, sun --><br />
<span id="more-331191"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/ibm_wants_sun_for_7_billion-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Panel Sunglasses: Because We Haven&#8217;t Stuck Solar Panels Into Glasses Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/solar_panel_sunglasses_because_we_havent_stuck_solar_panels_into_glasses_yet-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/solar_panel_sunglasses_because_we_havent_stuck_solar_panels_into_glasses_yet-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunglasses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/solar_panel_sunglasses_because_we_havent_stuck_solar_panels_into_glasses_yet-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In the future, sunglasses will need to do more than just make you look cool or prevent costly eye conditions. They&#8217;ll need to power your gadgets, according to at least one pair of designers.

The &#8220;Self-Energy Converting Sunglasses&#8221; concept uses a dye solar cell combined with unspecified nanotech to generate electricity while, presumably, still allowing you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/sig2.jpg" class="center"/></p>
<p>In the future, sunglasses will need to do more than just make you look cool or prevent costly eye conditions. They&#8217;ll need to power your gadgets, according to at least one pair of designers.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: sunglasses, concepts, design, designs, solar, solar panel sunglasses, solar panels, sun --><span id="more-319680"></span>
<p>The &#8220;Self-Energy Converting Sunglasses&#8221; concept uses a dye solar cell combined with unspecified nanotech to generate electricity while, presumably, still allowing you to see. The electricity passes through the frames to a port in the back of the glasses. Then a cord runs down your neck to your gadget of choice. </p>
<p>Hopefully by the time someone creates a working production model, we&#8217;ll be beyond such desperate attempts to charge our portable technology. Or maybe the glasses will at least hide a halfway decent HUD inside. [<a href="http://www.yankodesign.com/2008/12/17/solar-powered-solar-panel-sun-glasses/">Yanko</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/solar_panel_sunglasses_because_we_havent_stuck_solar_panels_into_glasses_yet-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
