<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; stun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/stun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Prototype Remote-Activated Wrist Stun-Device Shocks You For Aeroplane Security</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/prototype_remoteactivated_wrist_stundevice_shocks_you_for_aeroplane_security-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/prototype_remoteactivated_wrist_stundevice_shocks_you_for_aeroplane_security-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeroplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wristbands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/prototype_remoteactivated_wrist_stundevice_shocks_you_for_aeroplane_security-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This story from the Washington Times seems more ridiculous than ridiculously awesome, but the base of it is that some official in the Department of Homeland Security has &#8220;expressed great interest&#8221; in a wrist bracelet that can be remotely activated to stun the wearer. It works by taking the place of a boarding pass, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/shockwrist1.jpg" class="left"/>This story from the Washington Times seems more ridiculous than ridiculously awesome, but the base of it is that some official in the Department of Homeland Security has &#8220;expressed great interest&#8221; in a wrist bracelet that can be remotely activated to stun the wearer. It works by taking the place of a boarding pass, which you then wear on your wrist so the flight attendants can know who you are, where you are, and even shock you if you&#8217;re misbehaving. What makes this thing completely absurd is the diagram after the jump. A man threatens a crew member with a knife. The crew member shocks the man into submission, then <strong>SHOCKS EVERYONE ELSE</strong> as punishment for sitting passively by while he was being threatened. </p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: airline security, airlines, airplanes, remote, security, shocker, stun, stun-device, wrist, wrist shocker, wristwatch --><br />
<span id="more-296477"></span>
<p><i>Update</i>: Sorry, that last panel looks like a Photoshop. You fooled us, guy with rudimentary knowledge of the human anatomy!</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/shockwrist3.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2"/></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/aviation-security/2008/Jul/01/want-some-torture-with-your-peanuts/#again">Washington Times</a> via <a href="http://consumerist.com/tag/department-of-homeland-security/?i=5022513&#038;t=want-safe-skies-strap-this-remote+controlled-stun-device-to-yourself">Consumerist</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/prototype_remoteactivated_wrist_stundevice_shocks_you_for_aeroplane_security-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guy Who Uses Stun Gun on Son to Toughen Him Up Jailed, Unsurprisingly</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/guy_who_uses_stun_gun_on_son_to_toughen_him_up_jailed_unsurprisingly-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/guy_who_uses_stun_gun_on_son_to_toughen_him_up_jailed_unsurprisingly-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/guy_who_uses_stun_gun_on_son_to_toughen_him_up_jailed_unsurprisingly-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The father of an 18-month-old child is off to jail for four years after being found guilty of using a stun gun on the boy. His reason for using the 100,000-volt Dragonfire, which resulted in muscle damage to the kid&#8217;s heart, was because he wanted his son to be &#8220;the toughest cage fighter ever.&#8221; Yeah, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="tasebreakfast.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/01/tasebreakfast.jpg" width="464" height="367" class="center" />The father of an 18-month-old child is off to jail for four years after being found guilty of using a stun gun on the boy. His reason for using the 100,000-volt Dragonfire, which resulted in muscle damage to the kid&#8217;s heart, was because he wanted his son to be &#8220;the toughest cage fighter ever.&#8221; Yeah, the toughest heart-damaged, cage-fighting 18-month-old <i>ever</i>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: 100,000 volt, courts, dragonfire, gadgets, i'm stunned, jail, kids, ouch, portland, stun gun, stun guns, tasers --><br />
<span id="more-275543"></span>
<p>According to the Deputy DA in Portland, Ryan Wittman had made comments to witnesses saying he wanted his child &#8220;to be tough.&#8221; When first questioned, the dad&#8217;s genius response was to say that the two of them had been &#8220;playing peekaboo.&#8221; Hmm, that&#8217;ll be the special version of kilovolt peekaboo we&#8217;ve never heard of, then.</p>
<p>The 100,000-volt weapon Wittman used is, apparently, more powerful than police tasers. Wittman&#8217;s excuse for the incidents? Arguments with his wife. It took just 20 minutes for the court to decide that Wittman should be sent down for four years. [<a href="http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/crime/2008/01/28/tan.or.toddler.stun.gun.katu">CNN</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/01/guy_who_uses_stun_gun_on_son_to_toughen_him_up_jailed_unsurprisingly-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dragon Fire Rechargeable Stun Gun Puts Lighting in Your Pocket</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/dragon_fire_rechargeable_stun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/dragon_fire_rechargeable_stun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seamus Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[_]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/dragon_fire_rechargeable_stun.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dragon Fire Rechargeable Stun Gun packs a powerful punch, smacking down bad guys with 650,000 volts of electro-devastation. Small enough to conceal in the palm of your hand, they won&#8217;t know what hit &#8216;em. And, you can blind them first with its built-in LED flashlight. But wait a minute here. I&#8217;ve never seen a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="dragon_fire_stungun.jpg" src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/08/dragon_fire_stungun.jpg" width="240" height="180" class="left" />The Dragon Fire Rechargeable Stun Gun packs a powerful punch, smacking down bad guys with 650,000 volts of electro-devastation. Small enough to conceal in the palm of your hand, they won&#8217;t know what hit &#8216;em. And, you can blind them first with its built-in LED flashlight. But wait a minute here. I&#8217;ve never seen a stun gun this cheap.</p>
<p>This $79.99 stun gun is on sale for $25.99, making it a lot easier to procure. Does this mean everyone will be packing one of these mini-monsters someday soon? It could be those 650,000 volts won&#8217;t be sufficiently powerful to knock down the biggest badasses&mdash;maybe it&#8217;ll be just enough to piss them off. If it doesn&#8217;t shoot actual dragon fire, we&#8217;ll pass. [<a href="http://crunchgear.com/2007/08/01/illuminate-incapacitate-your-enemies-for-under-30/">CrunchGear</a>] <span id="more-249944"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/08/dragon_fire_rechargeable_stun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
