<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; stocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Not A Good Day To Be A GPS Manufacturer</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/its-not-a-good-day-to-be-a-gps-manufacturer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/its-not-a-good-day-to-be-a-gps-manufacturer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frucci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tomtom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=363360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s free GPS feature on Android 2.0 is great news! Unless you&#8217;re the fine folks at Garmin and TomTom, in which case, oh shit. [Engadget]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/gpsstocks.jpg" alt="" class="left" /><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/google-maps-navigation-a-free-ass-kicking-turn-by-turn-mobile-app/">Google&#8217;s free GPS feature on Android 2.0</a> is great news! Unless you&#8217;re the fine folks at Garmin and TomTom, in which case, oh shit. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/28/the-game-has-changed/">Engadget</a>]<span id="more-363360"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/its-not-a-good-day-to-be-a-gps-manufacturer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Stock Hits All-Time High, Flaunts Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-stock-hits-all-time-high-flaunts-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-stock-hits-all-time-high-flaunts-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=362003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s stock has hit a personal high for the company at $US205.04 per share, up from its previous high of $US202.96 back in 2007. The company&#8217;s overall value is rated at $US183 billion (Microsoft is $US236 billion, in comparison). [BusinessWeek]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s stock has hit a personal high for the company at $US205.04 per share, up from its previous high of $US202.96 back in 2007. The company&#8217;s overall value is rated at $US183 billion (Microsoft is $US236 billion, in comparison). [<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/ByteOfTheApple/blog/archives/2009/10/apple_stock_hit.html">BusinessWeek</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/apple-stock-hits-all-time-high-flaunts-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chart Of The Day: Google&#8217;s Massive Cash Flow In Context II</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/chart-of-the-day-googles-massive-cash-flow-in-context-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/chart-of-the-day-googles-massive-cash-flow-in-context-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Business Insider</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=360926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google turned in another solid quarter yesterday, with free cash flow coming in at $US2.5 billion. Think about it: that&#8217;s a $US10 billion run rate for a company that didn&#8217;t exist 10 years ago.
How does that stack up to other companies? It&#8217;s still not close to Microsoft, but it&#8217;s pulling away from Time Warner. Here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/google_chart.gif"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/10/500x_google_chart.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>Google <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com//gooogle-goog-q3-earnings-analysis">turned in</a> another solid quarter yesterday, with free cash flow coming in at $US2.5 billion. Think about it: that&#8217;s a $US10 billion run rate for a company that didn&#8217;t exist 10 years ago.<span id="more-360926"></span></p>
<p>How does that stack up to other companies? It&#8217;s still not close to Microsoft, but it&#8217;s pulling away from Time Warner. Here&#8217;s an <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-googles-growing-cash-flow-2009-4">update from our April chart</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/08/thumb160x_40b73624ed47a836c6882a101c6c7e92.gif" alt="" class="left" /></a></p>
<p><i>Note</i>: We&#8217;ve used analyst estimates for Q3 for Microsoft and Time Warner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/10/chart-of-the-day-googles-massive-cash-flow-in-context-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Puma Index Application Strips Girls As Stocks Go Down</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/puma-index-application-strips-girls-as-stocks-go-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/puma-index-application-strips-girls-as-stocks-go-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puma index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=355337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your Apple stock has taken a dive because His Steveness got a cold? Is Motorola&#8217;s crashing once again? Fret not, because the Puma Index iPhone application is here to cheer you up, with plenty of naughty bits. For free.

The economic crisis never was so nice and hard at the same time. [iTunes Store]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/puma-index.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_puma-index.jpg" alt="" class="left" /></a>Your Apple stock has taken a dive because <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/steve_jobs_health_declining_rapidly_reason_for_macworld_cancellation-2/">His Steveness got a cold</a>? Is <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/another_motorola_insider_points_fingers_to_incompetent_execs-2/">Motorola&#8217;s crashing once again</a>? Fret not, because the Puma Index iPhone application is here to cheer you up, with plenty of naughty bits. For free.<span id="more-355337"></span></p>
<p><object width="500" height="308"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KtNLpKPL6Eo&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KtNLpKPL6Eo&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308"></object></p>
<p>The economic crisis never was so nice and hard at the same time. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=329202412&amp;mt=8">iTunes Store</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/puma-index-application-strips-girls-as-stocks-go-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC All Up In Apple&#8217;s Business For Possible Illegal Insider Stock Trading</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/sec-all-up-in-apples-business-for-possible-illegal-insider-stock-trading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/sec-all-up-in-apples-business-for-possible-illegal-insider-stock-trading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=350375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SEC is all up in Apple&#8217;s business again, this time over suspicions that some illegal trading may have gone down using insider information in regards to &#8220;three particular Apple-related developments&#8221;. HuffPo&#8217;s Dan Dorfman points at someone getting an &#8220;illegal lead&#8221; on iPod sales, true knowledge of Steve Jobs&#8217; health, and when Apple was gonna [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SEC is all up in Apple&#8217;s business again, this time over suspicions that some illegal trading may have gone down using insider information in regards to &#8220;three particular Apple-related developments&#8221;. HuffPo&#8217;s Dan Dorfman points at someone getting an &#8220;illegal lead&#8221; on iPod sales, true knowledge of Steve Jobs&#8217; health, and when Apple was gonna release info about those two things. Hmm. [<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-dorfman/sec-investigating-apple-t_b_272159.html?view=screen">HuffPo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/09/sec-all-up-in-apples-business-for-possible-illegal-insider-stock-trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even More Head-Scratching Apple Analysis From CNBC</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/even-more-head-scratching-apple-analysis-from-cnbc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/even-more-head-scratching-apple-analysis-from-cnbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Loftus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inaccuracies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=338863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Additional Apple-related shenanigans from CNBC as they report on Apple stock &#8220;tanking&#8221; in January following Steve Jobs&#8217; poor health:
 Apple&#8217;s stock had tanked in January, falling as low as $US78.20, when Jobs said he had a hormone imbalance and the company announced that its founder would be taking a six-month medical leave. It has since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/stockshan.jpg" alt="" class="center" />Additional Apple-related <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/cnbc_is_ridiculous_macs_come_with_photoshop_pcs_need_600_extra_to_perform_as_well_as_a_mac-2/">shenanigans from CNBC</a> as they report on Apple stock &#8220;tanking&#8221; in January following Steve Jobs&#8217; poor health:<span id="more-338863"></span></p>
<blockquote><p> Apple&#8217;s stock had tanked in January, falling as low as $US78.20, when Jobs said he had a hormone imbalance and the company announced that its founder would be taking a six-month medical leave. It has since made a choppy comeback as concerns about his health persist.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> Thing is, as John Gruber accurately notes with a simple Google Finance chart, that isn&#8217;t entirely true.</p>
<p>To say this kind of odd Apple reporting from CNBC is &#8220;something new&#8221; would also be, of course, <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?s=cnbc">not entirely true.</a> [<a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/31456167">CNBC</a> via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2009/06/21/cnbc-jobs">Daring Fireball</a> via <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/06/21/tanked.html">BBG</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/06/even-more-head-scratching-apple-analysis-from-cnbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart vs Jim Cramer on Manipulating Apple Stock</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/jon_stewart_vs_jim_cramer_on_manipulating_apple_stock-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/jon_stewart_vs_jim_cramer_on_manipulating_apple_stock-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jon stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/jon_stewart_vs_jim_cramer_on_manipulating_apple_stock-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ newVideoPlayer("/kramer.flv", 506, 423,""); It&#8217;s been interesting watching the CNBC&#8217;s bad habits come under fire by the mighty Jon Stewart. Gawker&#8217;s got a clip of Cramer as he appears on The Daily Show tonight, where Jim Cramer is quoted talking about manipulating Apple stock.


Cramer listens, and doesn&#8217;t defend himself too much, which is admirable. Watching [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript"> newVideoPlayer("/kramer.flv", 506, 423,""); </script>It&#8217;s been interesting watching the CNBC&#8217;s bad habits come under fire by the mighty Jon Stewart. Gawker&#8217;s got a clip of Cramer as he appears on The Daily Show tonight, where Jim Cramer is quoted talking about manipulating Apple stock.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: cnbc, apple, jim cramer, jim goldman --><br />
<span id="more-330587"></span>
<p>Cramer listens, and doesn&#8217;t defend himself too much, which is admirable. Watching this is especially interesting for me because a few weeks ago, we took some shots (<a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/steve_jobs_skips_macworld_because_of_his_health-2.html">counterpunches</a>, really) against CNBC Silicon Valley Bureau chief <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jim%20goldman">Jim Goldman&#8217;s reporting</a>. Maybe it&#8217;s not them. But maybe it&#8217;s the network and TV news in general. [<a href="http://gawker.com/5169222/stewart-cant-land-knockout-punch-on-meek-cramer">Gawker</a>, <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/">Jon Stewart is My Hero</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/jon_stewart_vs_jim_cramer_on_manipulating_apple_stock-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Songsmith Cheerily Documents the Collapse of the World Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/microsoft_songsmith_cheerily_documents_the_collapse_of_the_world_economy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/microsoft_songsmith_cheerily_documents_the_collapse_of_the_world_economy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financiapocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[songsmith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/microsoft_songsmith_cheerily_documents_the_collapse_of_the_world_economy-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s inherently-ironic Songsmith software is such a goldmine. Here, some jokester has turned those stock market frowns upside-down by setting them to Songsmith&#8217;s relentlessly upbeat Casiotone beats. 


If this doesn&#8217;t put a smile on your face, you&#8217;re probably not closing your eyes hard enough. [YouTube, thanks Hendrik!]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br clear="all" /><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2-BZfFakpzc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2-BZfFakpzc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Microsoft&#8217;s inherently-ironic Songsmith software is such a goldmine. Here, some jokester has turned those stock market frowns upside-down by setting them to Songsmith&#8217;s relentlessly upbeat Casiotone beats. </p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: video of the day, microsoft, music, songsmith, stock charts --><br />
<span id="more-325163"></span>
<p>If this doesn&#8217;t put a smile on your face, you&#8217;re probably not closing your eyes hard enough. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-BZfFakpzc">YouTube</a>, <em>thanks Hendrik!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/microsoft_songsmith_cheerily_documents_the_collapse_of_the_world_economy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palm Stock Jumps 34.85% On Palm Pre News</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/palm_stock_jumps_3485_on_palm_pre_news-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/palm_stock_jumps_3485_on_palm_pre_news-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/palm_stock_jumps_3485_on_palm_pre_news-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the stupid Pre name, Palm has jumped up $US1.15 to $US4.45. Doesn&#8217;t look like a lot, but that&#8217;s 34.85%, which is like a 1,548% in the Investors Confidence Index, and 543% in dog years.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/palm-is-alive_01.jpg" style="display:block;" />Despite the stupid Pre name, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&#038;q=NASDAQ:PALM">Palm</a> has jumped up $US1.15 to $US4.45. Doesn&#8217;t look like a lot, but that&#8217;s 34.85%, which is like a 1,548% in the Investors Confidence Index, and 543% in dog years.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: palm pre, palm, palm stock, pre --><span id="more-321979"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/palm_stock_jumps_3485_on_palm_pre_news-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Stock Hits 10-Year Low</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/microsoft_stock_hits_10year_low-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/microsoft_stock_hits_10year_low-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/microsoft_stock_hits_10year_low-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a Jefferies Group analyst cut Microsoft&#8217;s 2009 revenue forecasts, Microsoft&#8217;s stock fell to its lowest levels since 1998. 
The projections were reduced due to &#8220;downward pressure on PC unit sales&#8221;, not Vista or lawsuits. And indeed, when you study Microsoft&#8217;s decline the past few months that&#8217;s right in line with the S&#038;P 500, it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/11/microsoftstock.jpg" alt="" class="center" />After a Jefferies Group analyst cut Microsoft&#8217;s 2009 revenue forecasts, Microsoft&#8217;s stock fell to its lowest levels since 1998. <span id="more-315597"></span></p>
<p>The projections were reduced due to &#8220;downward pressure on PC unit sales&#8221;, not Vista or <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/hp_not_too_happy_about_the_vista_capable_standards_scandal-2.html">lawsuits</a>. And indeed, when you study Microsoft&#8217;s decline the past few months that&#8217;s right in line with the S&#038;P 500, it&#8217;s tough to blame anything but the generally crappy economy. [<a href="http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/154278.asp?">Seattle PI</a> and <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/">Yahoo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/microsoft_stock_hits_10year_low-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
