<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; steel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/steel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Corrugated Steel Fallout Shelter Protects Against Mild Rainstorms</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/corrugated-steel-fallout-shelter-protects-against-most-mild-rainstorms-probably/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/corrugated-steel-fallout-shelter-protects-against-most-mild-rainstorms-probably/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bomb shelters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/?p=365136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This fallout shelter plan, from 1962, only cost $US150 in raw materials, and if properly made, has a &#8220;protection factor greater than 500&#8243;. 500 what? No idea! 
[Mayor's Office via Boing Boing]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bomb-shelter.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bomb-shelter.jpg" alt="" class="center" /></a>This fallout shelter plan, from 1962, only cost $US150 in raw materials, and if properly made, has a &#8220;protection factor greater than 500&#8243;. 500 what? No idea! <span id="more-365136"></span></p>
<p>[<a href="http://fromthedeskofthemayor.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-frontier-deparment-of-defense.html">Mayor's Office</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/05/1962-fallout-shelter.html">Boing Boing</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/11/corrugated-steel-fallout-shelter-protects-against-most-mild-rainstorms-probably/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neutron Star Crusts Are 10 Billion Times Stronger Than Steel</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/neutron_star_crusts_are_10_billion_times_stronger_than_steel-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/neutron_star_crusts_are_10_billion_times_stronger_than_steel-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black holes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get me off this rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/neutron_star_crusts_are_10_billion_times_stronger_than_steel-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A teaspoon of this stuff would weigh 100 million tons, and the only thing more dense is a black hole. Space is weird.


Scientists at the University of Indiana have shown the incredibly density and molecular strength of neutron stars, which as all you amateur astronomers know is the leftover from a gravitational collapse of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/xsection.jpg" alt="" />A teaspoon of this stuff would weigh 100 million tons, and the only thing more dense is a black hole. Space is weird.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: space, black holes, density, get me off this rock, nerds, neutron star crusts, neutron stars, stars, steel --><br />
<span id="more-335515"></span>
<p>Scientists at the University of Indiana have shown the incredibly density and molecular strength of neutron stars, which as all you amateur astronomers know is the leftover from a gravitational collapse of a star during a supernova. The research was started out of concern that the intense gravitational pull of these things could cause ripples in space-time, but could lead to new understanding of star quakes or magnetar giant flares.</p>
<p>So the next time you&#8217;re about to push your glasses up your nose and toss an esoteric insult at your lab partner, consider &#8220;as dense as a neutron star.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-05/iu-sc1050609.php">Eureka</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/05/06/i-want-my-next-phone-to-be-made-out-of-star-crust/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/neutron_star_crusts_are_10_billion_times_stronger_than_steel-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prosciutto-Wrapped Air Hose Cuts Through Steel, Cucumber Version Proven Inferior</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/prosciuttowrapped_air_hose_cuts_through_steel_cucumber_version_proven_inferior-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/prosciuttowrapped_air_hose_cuts_through_steel_cucumber_version_proven_inferior-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nosowitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blowtorch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/prosciuttowrapped_air_hose_cuts_through_steel_cucumber_version_proven_inferior-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a crushing blow for vegetarians worldwide, a cucumber doused in vegetable oil has been proven inferior to prosciutto when tasked with cutting through steel sheet metal. Pork: 1, PETA: 0.


The fat in the prosciutto and the oil-slathered cucumber is used with oxygen and a flame to combust, giving a fairly strong-burning torch. Check out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/Picture_5_03.png" alt="" />In a crushing blow for vegetarians worldwide, a cucumber doused in vegetable oil has been proven inferior to prosciutto when tasked with cutting through steel sheet metal. Pork: 1, PETA: 0.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: pork products, air hose, bacon, fire, lance, prosciutto, steel, torch --><br />
<span id="more-334362"></span>
<p>The fat in the prosciutto and the oil-slathered cucumber is used with oxygen and a flame to combust, giving a fairly strong-burning torch. Check out the video below.</p>
<p><object id="ep_player" name="ep_player" height="360" width="640" data="http://cdn.episodic.com/player/EpisodicPlayer.swf?config=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.episodic.com%2Fshows%2F53%2Flo38izydkr9d%2F2%2Fconfig.xml" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.episodic.com/player/EpisodicPlayer.swf?config=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.episodic.com%2Fshows%2F53%2Flo38izydkr9d%2F2%2Fconfig.xml"><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><embed src="http://cdn.episodic.com/player/EpisodicPlayer.swf?config=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.episodic.com%2Fshows%2F53%2Flo38izydkr9d%2F2%2Fconfig.xml" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="640" height="360" id="ep_player" name="ep_player"></object></p>
<p>Proscuitto, we should add, is a dry-cured (not smoked, like American bacon) spiced Italian pork product, and despite hailing from communist Europe, is far superior to what we in the States know as bacon. That&#8217;s right. There&#8217;s something better than bacon. [<a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/04/15/bb-video-the-flaming.html">Boing Boing Gadgets</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/04/prosciuttowrapped_air_hose_cuts_through_steel_cucumber_version_proven_inferior-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Monolith Table Transforms to Seat Ten</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/the_monolith_table_transforms_to_seat_ten-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/the_monolith_table_transforms_to_seat_ten-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[furniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/the_monolith_table_transforms_to_seat_ten-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you walked into a friend&#8217;s house to see this 2.5m stainless steel hourglass, you&#8217;d probably think he makes too much money. If he unfolded the sculpture for 10-person dinner seating, you&#8217;d know it.


By designer Gioia Meller Marcovicz, the Monolith Table is a masterpiece of steel featuring a folding dining table and ten perfectly fitted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/monolith1.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />If you walked into a friend&#8217;s house to see this 2.5m stainless steel hourglass, you&#8217;d probably think he makes too much money. If he unfolded the sculpture for 10-person dinner seating, you&#8217;d <em>know</em> it.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: design, art, concepts, dining room, furniture, kitchen, monolith table, steel table --><br />
<span id="more-318316"></span>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/12/monolith4.jpg" class="center" style="display:block;" />By designer Gioia Meller Marcovicz, the Monolith Table is a masterpiece of steel featuring a folding dining table and ten perfectly fitted (also folding) chairs to go along with it. I&#8217;m not sure that there&#8217;s any particular reason to essentially pack up such a large table into a large sculpture. I mean, it&#8217;s still going to take up half your living room either way, and it&#8217;s not exactly multi-functional as a giant block of metal.</p>
<p>But I sure do like to turn off my brain and look at it. [<a href="http://gioiadesign.com/gallery/monolith/monolith1.html">Monolith</a> via <a href="http://www.bookofjoe.com/2008/12/monolith-by-gio.html">bookofjoe</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/12/the_monolith_table_transforms_to_seat_ten-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buckypaper: Silly Name, Incredibly Strong and Light Material</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/buckypaper_silly_name_incredibly_strong_and_light_material-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/buckypaper_silly_name_incredibly_strong_and_light_material-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buckypaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strength]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/buckypaper_silly_name_incredibly_strong_and_light_material-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flying in a plane made of a material called &#8216;buckypaper&#8217; may not seem too appealing at first, but this new type of carbon nanotube may be the future of lightweight, high strength composite. Discovered accidentally while trying to create the same conditions that exist in a star, buckypaper is far from reaching its potential, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/buckypaper.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />Flying in a plane made of a material called &#8216;buckypaper&#8217; may not seem too appealing at first, but this new type of carbon nanotube may be the future of lightweight, high strength composite. Discovered accidentally while trying to create the same conditions that exist in a star, buckypaper is far from reaching its potential, but what a potential it is.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: science, airplane, buckminsterfullerene, buckypaper, composite, high, steel, strength --><br />
<span id="more-311109"></span>
<p>The tube-shaped variation of the buckminsterfullerene molecule is dispersed in liquid and then filtered through a fine mesh, creating a very thin but very powerful film, now called buckypaper. The peculiarly shaped molecule has a huge surface area, leading to incredible strength: when stacked to become a composite, it can be 10 times lighter but possibly 500 times stronger than steel, but conducts and disperses heat like copper. It&#8217;s far from being commercially available, but its uses may be as far-ranging as aviation, computers, batteries, military stealth armour, and fuel cells. Specifically mentioned is the possibility that it might dissipate heat from crotch-burning laptops, so fingers crossed it gets here sooner than later. [<a href="http://news.wired.com/dynamic/stories/T/TEC_BUCKYPAPER?SITE=WIRE&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&#038;CTIME=2008-10-18-03-35-31">AP</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/buckypaper_silly_name_incredibly_strong_and_light_material-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Nanotube Manufacturing Breakthrough Could Mean Bye-Bye Steel</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/carbon_nanotube_manufacturing_breakthrough_could_mean_byebye_steel-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/carbon_nanotube_manufacturing_breakthrough_could_mean_byebye_steel-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kit Eaton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[csiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/carbon_nanotube_manufacturing_breakthrough_could_mean_byebye_steel-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon nanotubes have been popping on Giz for a while, touted as one of the next wonder-materials&#8212;but a new development in their manufacture means they may not remain &#8220;future technology&#8221; for long. In fact the work of a team at CSIRO and the University of Texas at Dallas means that commercial-scale production of sheets of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/nanotubes1.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />Carbon nanotubes have been <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/carbon_nanotube_supercapacitors_may_replace_clunky_car_batteries-2.html">popping</a><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/nanotubes_could_make_for_bouncy_cellphones_im_talkin_to_you_butterfingers-2.html"></a> <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/new_material_stretches_while_conducting_electricity-2.html">on</a> Giz for a while, touted as one of the next wonder-materials&mdash;but a new development in their manufacture means they may not remain &#8220;future technology&#8221; for long. In fact the work of a team at CSIRO and the University of Texas at Dallas means that commercial-scale production of sheets of carbon nanotube &#8220;textile&#8221; is possible at up to seven metres per minute.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: nanotubes, carbon, carbon nanotube sheets, csiro, engineering, gadgets, physics, science, steel, strength, university of texas, wonder material --><br />
<span id="more-308367"></span>
<p>And these are no ordinary textiles either: they&#8217;re transparent and way stronger than a sheet of steel. The team&#8217;s technique involves chemically-growing &#8220;forests&#8221; of nanotubes that self-assemble, and is reported in <i>Science</i> currently. If it proves true we may see nanotube materials replacing metals like steel pretty soon&mdash;though I&#8217;m not sure how many people would balk at flying in a plane with wings you can partly see through. [<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news141920703.html">Physorg</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/carbon_nanotube_manufacturing_breakthrough_could_mean_byebye_steel-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Futuristic Origami Desk Cut and Folded from a Single Sheet of Steel</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/futuristic_origami_desk_cut_and_folded_from_a_single_sheet_of_steel-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/futuristic_origami_desk_cut_and_folded_from_a_single_sheet_of_steel-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fallon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[furniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[origami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/futuristic_origami_desk_cut_and_folded_from_a_single_sheet_of_steel-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No doubt about it, this is one bad-ass-looking desk. But the 3Fold from Formtank is more than just a striking visual design&#8212;it is also impressive because it was cut and folded from a single sheet of steel using CAD/CAM technology. Formtank bills it as an excellent CEO desk, which is why it takes CEO money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/3fold-desk.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />No doubt about it, this is one bad-ass-looking desk. But the 3Fold from Formtank is more than just a striking visual design&mdash;it is also impressive because it was cut and folded from a single sheet of steel using CAD/CAM technology. Formtank bills it as an excellent CEO desk, which is why it takes CEO money to buy one. Constructing your own version starts at around US$7,000. [<a href="http://www.formtank.com/products_three_fold.php">Formtank</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/09/12/desk-cut-and-folded.html">Core77</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/09/12/desk-cut-and-folded.html">Boing Boing</a>]<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost('3folddesk', 3, ''); </script></p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: desk, 3fold, cad, design, formtank, furniture, steel --><span id="more-306007"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/futuristic_origami_desk_cut_and_folded_from_a_single_sheet_of_steel-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9/11 Twin Tower Collapse Provides Data For Building Better Fusion Reactors</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/911_twin_tower_collapse_provides_data_for_building_better_fusion_reactors-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/911_twin_tower_collapse_provides_data_for_building_better_fusion_reactors-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/911_twin_tower_collapse_provides_data_for_building_better_fusion_reactors-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t be afraid. You can read that headline again. I&#8217;ll wait for you&#8230; Aaaand, okay: With cold fusion nowhere in sight, hot fusion looks to be the cleanest way to whip up some atomic energy. However, the steel needed to line the reactor may not be able to take the heat. UK scientists said that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/Fusion_Nine_Eleven.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />Don&#8217;t be afraid. You can read that headline again. I&#8217;ll wait for you&#8230; Aaaand, okay: With cold fusion nowhere in sight, hot fusion looks to be the cleanest way to whip up some atomic energy. However, the steel needed to line the reactor may not be able to take the heat. UK scientists said that temperatures inside reactors are nearly identical to those reached on the floors of the World Trade Centre that were struck by planes on September 11, 2001&mdash;and that the tragedy itself yielded helpful data. Here, on the eve of the terrorist attack&#8217;s 7th anniversary, is the deal:</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: strange pairing, 9/11, atomic energy, fusion reactor, iter, metallurgy, nuclear fusion, september 11 2001, steel, terror, war on terror --><br />
<span id="more-305669"></span>
<p>By studying the WTC&#8217;s structural weakening and collapse, scientists can identify the needs of new steel technology in the next atomic age. Steel may truly melt at 1,150ºC, but as low as 500ºC, the iron molecules that are held strong by magnetism at cooler temperatures start to slip, Sergei &#8220;Duder&#8221; &#8220;His Dudeness&#8221; &#8220;El Dudarino&#8221; Dudarev, principal scientist at the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA), told BBC News. Imperfections in the metal enhance the oozing even more. The Twin Towers started to weaken when temperatures crossed the 500ºC threshold, and gave way without ever actually melting.</p>
<p>Today, Dudarev and others are at work on the world&#8217;s first &#8220;large-scale&#8221; fusion reactor, called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER">ITER</a>. What the scientists need, though, is a steel that can ease past these temperatures without buckling. &#8220;We need to look at the magnetic properties of steel, [and] vary their chemical composition in a systematic way in order to get rid of this behaviour,&#8221; the Dude told BBC. (No word if <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/team_05_microsope_takes_closest_look_ever_at_graphene_the_worlds_strongest_known_material-2.html">graphene</a> is something that could be put to use.)</p>
<p>The weirdest factoid of the whole story is this: Steel&#8217;s peak elasticity is reached at&#8230; 911ºC. Now <i>that</i> gives me the chills. [<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7607473.stm">BBC News</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/911_twin_tower_collapse_provides_data_for_building_better_fusion_reactors-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samurai Sword Maker Holds The Key To Nuclear Reactors</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/samurai_sword_maker_holds_the_key_to_nuclear_reactors-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/samurai_sword_maker_holds_the_key_to_nuclear_reactors-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samurai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/samurai_sword_maker_holds_the_key_to_nuclear_reactors-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In testament to old world craftsmanship, Japan Steel Works is both a samurai sword maker and the only company in the world that&#8217;s good enough with steel to produce the central part of a nuclear reactor&#8217;s containment vessel in one piece, an engineering necessity in order to reduce the risk of radioactive leaks. The company [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/03/ac-Drak_Samurai-1.jpg" class="left"   style="display:block;float:none"/>In testament to old world craftsmanship, Japan Steel Works is both a samurai sword maker <em>and</em> the only company in the world that&#8217;s good enough with steel to produce the central part of a nuclear reactor&#8217;s containment vessel in one piece, an engineering necessity in order to reduce the risk of radioactive leaks. The company spends so much time and resources on each containment vessel that they can only produce four per year, flaunting a price tag starting with a US$100 million down payment. [<a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&#038;sid=aaVMzCTMz3ms&#038;refer=home">bloomberg</a> via <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/14/1238233&#038;from=rss">slashdot</a>] [<a href="http://www.ice.org/index.php?display=art&#038;artID=10954&#038;packID=200209">image</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: japan steel works, nuclear, nuclear reactors, reactors, samurai, steel, swords, weapons --><br />
<span id="more-281389"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/samurai_sword_maker_holds_the_key_to_nuclear_reactors-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
