<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gizmodo Australia &#187; stealth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/tags/stealth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stealth Bike Celebrates 20th Anniversary of B-2 Stealth Bomber&#8217;s First Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/stealth_bike_celebrates_20th_anniversary_of_b2_stealth_bombers_first_flight-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/stealth_bike_celebrates_20th_anniversary_of_b2_stealth_bombers_first_flight-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aeroplanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/stealth_bike_celebrates_20th_anniversary_of_b2_stealth_bombers_first_flight-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This year marks the 20th Anniversary of the B-2 Stealth Bomber&#8217;s first flight. To celebrate, Northrop Grumman&#8217;s has unveiled the B-2 Stealth Bike, which unfortunately doesn&#8217;t fly and it&#8217;s not invisible. It looks&#8230; hmmm, stealthy?



[Flight Global]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/b2-bike.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>This year marks the 20th Anniversary of the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/b2_stealth_bomber_crashes_12_billion_dollars_turn_to_smoke-2.html">B-2 Stealth Bomber&#8217;s</a> first flight. To celebrate, Northrop Grumman&#8217;s has unveiled the B-2 Stealth Bike, which unfortunately doesn&#8217;t fly and it&#8217;s not invisible. It looks&#8230; hmmm, stealthy?</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: airplanes, b-2 stealth bike, b-2 stealth bomber, bike, clips, stealth, video --><br />
<span id="more-335224"></span>
<p><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EZkTU1rRwLM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EZkTU1rRwLM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/04/EZkTU1rRwLM.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/04/stealth-bike-unveiling-now-on.html">Flight Global</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/05/stealth_bike_celebrates_20th_anniversary_of_b2_stealth_bombers_first_flight-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misty Stealth Satellite Hides Perfectly While Watching You</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/misty_stealth_satellite_hides_perfectly_while_watching_you-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/misty_stealth_satellite_hides_perfectly_while_watching_you-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retromodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/misty_stealth_satellite_hides_perfectly_while_watching_you-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Misty. That&#8217;s the codename for one of the most advanced spy satellites up there. Launched in a 1990 military mission of space shuttle Atlantis, Misty is hidden by something really weird: A balloon.


As you can see in the image, Misty uses a conical reflective balloon. Little is known about how it works but in theory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/misty.jpg" alt="" />Misty. That&#8217;s the codename for one of the most advanced spy satellites up there. Launched in a 1990 military mission of space shuttle Atlantis, Misty is hidden by something really weird: A balloon.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: retromodo, military, misty, space, stealth satellite --><br />
<span id="more-329139"></span>
<p>As you can see in the image, Misty uses a conical reflective balloon. Little is known about how it works but in theory this design&mdash;which is patented by Teledyne Industries, who did the design for the US government&mdash;can both deflect ground lasers, radar waves, and hide it from the plain eye. [<a href="http://www.gwu.edu/%7ensarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB143/nph-Parser.htm">GWU</a> via <a href="http://www.bisbos.com/rocketscience/spacecraft/misty/misty.html">This Is Rocket Science</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/03/1089107.h2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/03/misty_stealth_satellite_hides_perfectly_while_watching_you-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Always Wanted a Stealth Boat? The Navy Is Giving This One Away</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/always_wanted_a_stealth_boat_the_navy_is_giving_this_one_away-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/always_wanted_a_stealth_boat_the_navy_is_giving_this_one_away-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hobomodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submarines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/always_wanted_a_stealth_boat_the_navy_is_giving_this_one_away-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is Sea Shadow, the Navy&#8217;s first first stealth vessel and the inspiration for the stealth ship in Tomorrow Never Dies. It can now be yours, for free. But there&#8217;s a catch.


The catch is, the Navy is insisting upon donating it in tandem with a giant, ugly, rust-laden submsersible barge called the Hughes Mining Barge. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/46b.jpg" alt="" />This is Sea Shadow, the Navy&#8217;s first first stealth vessel and the inspiration for the stealth ship in Tomorrow Never Dies. It can <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123543023154353525.html">now be yours, for free</a>. But there&#8217;s a catch.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: military, boats, hobomodo, hughes mining barge, navy, sea shadow, ships, stealth, stealth boat, stealth ship --><br />
<span id="more-328554"></span>
<p>The catch is, the Navy is insisting upon donating it in tandem with a giant, ugly, rust-laden submsersible barge called the Hughes Mining Barge. The vessel was actually used as a floating dock for the Sea Shadow, protecting it from the prying eyes of Soviet spy satellites.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/stealthboat_web.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123543023154353525.html">WSJ</a> has a great story on Frank Lennon, a Naval museum operator in Providence, RI whose sole attraction&mdash;a retired old Soviet sub&mdash;was sunk by a tidal wave. While it has recently been exhumed from the deep, Frank has his eye on the Sea Shadow as his next big crowd-getter. Now he just has to figure out what to do with ths shitty old barge it comes with.</p>
<p>Anyone want to take on old Frank for the prize? The Navy is waiting for your calls. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123543023154353525.html">WSJ</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/always_wanted_a_stealth_boat_the_navy_is_giving_this_one_away-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stealth Tech Blamed for International Sub Crash, French Crew Unaware They&#8217;d Hit Anyone for Days</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/stealth_tech_blamed_for_international_sub_crash_french_crew_unaware_theyd_hit_anyone_for_days-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/stealth_tech_blamed_for_international_sub_crash_french_crew_unaware_theyd_hit_anyone_for_days-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Herrman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submarines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/stealth_tech_blamed_for_international_sub_crash_french_crew_unaware_theyd_hit_anyone_for_days-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How could two submarines end up colliding in the middle of the ocean? British military types are blaming excessive stealthiness, and the French claim they didn&#8217;t realise what had happened for days.


A Royal Navy source told the Times:
It is remarkably difficult to detect a modern submarine with sonar and we work very hard with our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/02/subcrash.jpg" alt="" />How could two submarines end up <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/two_nuclear_submarines_collide_in_the_atlantic-2.html">colliding in the middle of the ocean</a>? British military types are blaming excessive stealthiness, and the French claim they didn&#8217;t realise what had happened for <em>days</em>.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: military, active sonar, collision, nuclear, nuclear submarines collision, passive sonar, sonar, stealth, submarines, wtf --><br />
<span id="more-327592"></span>
<p>A Royal Navy source told the <em>Times</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is remarkably difficult to detect a modern submarine with sonar and we work very hard with our own submarines, as do our allies, in making them as quiet as possible so they are not detectable.</p></blockquote>
<p>And he&#8217;s serious about that&mdash;even <em>after</em> realising they&#8217;d hit something, the French crew couldn&#8217;t tell what it was. They wrote the object off as a shipping container, only to find out that they had actually collided with another submarine upon docking three days later, after the government had deduced the collision from routine information exchanges with the British.</p>
<p>The problem was that both submarines use passive sonar to map out their surroundings, which doesn&#8217;t give away their location with the &#8216;pings&#8217; of active sonar, and is somewhat less sensitive. Without these &#8216;pings&#8217;, it was nearly impossible for either sub&#8217;s passive sonar to detect the other&#8217;s, leading to the collision and subsequent confusion.</p>
<p>In reality, the whole thing was a bit more subdued than initial reports (or our imaginations) led us to believe. The subs, which were travelling very slowly, just sort of bonked into on another, and the only critical damage to either vessel was to the French sub&#8217;s sonar system. [<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5746690.ece">Times Online</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/02/stealth_tech_blamed_for_international_sub_crash_french_crew_unaware_theyd_hit_anyone_for_days-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stealth Bomber: Cool As a Plane, Really, Really, Really Stupid as a Motorcycle</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/stealth_bomber_cool_as_a_plane_really_really_really_stupid_as_a_motorcycle-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/stealth_bomber_cool_as_a_plane_really_really_really_stupid_as_a_motorcycle-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorcycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/stealth_bomber_cool_as_a_plane_really_really_really_stupid_as_a_motorcycle-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year marks the 20th anniversary of the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, an occasion that can only be properly immortalised by the crew at Orange County Choppers, apparently.


I&#8217;m no warmonger, nor am I a motorcycle fiend, but I can appreciate both a landmark plane with an iconic design and a lavishly expensive bike all the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/b2bike.jpg" style="display:block;float:none;" />This year marks the 20th anniversary of the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, an occasion that can only be properly immortalised by the crew at Orange County Choppers, apparently.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: motorcycles, b-2 bomber, b-2 bomber bike, b-2 motorcycle, jets, occ, orange county choppers, planes --><br />
<span id="more-322896"></span>
<p>I&#8217;m no warmonger, nor am I a motorcycle fiend, but I can appreciate both a landmark plane with an iconic design and a lavishly expensive bike all the same.</p>
<p>Yet when I look at this B-2 bike, all I can think is, the US Airforce actually spent money on that?</p>
<p>How about we commemorate 20 years of the B-2 bomber with, say, the uber-badass B-2 bomber? Who cares that this bike has some of the original titanium from the original B-2 aft deck or that each wheel features some stupid scale models of B-2s in star formations? What&#8217;s next, B-2 collectible cards in the spokes?</p>
<p>I look at this motorcycle and can only reminisce of the short-lived Street Sharks cartoon/toy campaign. It&#8217;s a caricature of America&#8217;s historical techno-military supremacy, but an unintentional one at that. [<a href="http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=157374">Northrop Grumman</a> via <a href="http://www.gizmowatch.com/entry/b-2-bomber-themed-motorcycle-but-it-doesn-t-fly/">Gizmowatch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/01/stealth_bomber_cool_as_a_plane_really_really_really_stupid_as_a_motorcycle-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightning Review: EyeClops Night Vision Goggles</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/lightning_review_eyeclops_night_vision_goggles-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/lightning_review_eyeclops_night_vision_goggles-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo US Edition</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eyeclops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goggles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightning reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night vision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/lightning_review_eyeclops_night_vision_goggles-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Gadget: EyeClops Night Vision Infrared Stealth Goggles, the cheapo-version of the spy favourite that&#8217;ll allow you to go exploring, play wargames, or stalk your ex-girlfriend in the dark. galleryPost("eyeclopsgoggles", 3, ""); 

The Price: $US80, but going for $US60 just about everywhere.
The Verdict: Good goggles for the price. While they aren&#8217;t exactly battlefield quality, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/10/mascaaaary.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" /><strong>The Gadget</strong>: <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/eyeclops_night_vision_goggles_my_secret_manhunt_weapon-2.html">EyeClops Night Vision Infrared Stealth Goggles</a>, the cheapo-version of the spy favourite that&#8217;ll allow you to go exploring, play wargames, or stalk your ex-girlfriend in the dark.<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> galleryPost("eyeclopsgoggles", 3, ""); </script></p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: reviews, eyclops night vision goggles review, eyeclops, eyeclops night vision goggles, eyeclops night vision infrared stealth goggles, lightning review, lightning reviews, night vision, night vision goggles, review --><span id="more-313168"></span>
<p><strong>The Price</strong>: $US80, but going for $US60 just about everywhere.</p>
<p><strong>The Verdict</strong>: Good goggles for the price. While they aren&#8217;t exactly battlefield quality, the goggles work well enough to light up your path in the dark. The close-up setting is okay if you only care about what&#8217;s right in front of you, but you won&#8217;t be able to check up on your former lover from a tree without turning on the long-distance setting which will give up your position with a bunch of bright red lights.</p>
<p>Friends who&#8217;ve tried on the goggles complain that the night vision is only displayed in one eye (the other is covered with a piece of plastic), but I think that cameras in both eyes could get more confusing than necessary. The only problem I have is that it takes 6 AA batteries, which is too many to hold on your head comfortably if you&#8217;re going to be wearing them for a long time. But again, they are way cheaper than the next level of night-vision gear, so if you want to feel and look like you are from the future without spending future prices, these goggles are the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/11/lightning_review_eyeclops_night_vision_goggles-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next Generation Stealth Bombers Jump Out of Hyperspace</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/next_generation_stealth_bombers_jump_out_of_hyperspace-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/next_generation_stealth_bombers_jump_out_of_hyperspace-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesus Diaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockheed martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/next_generation_stealth_bombers_jump_out_of_hyperspace-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next-generation stealth bomber from Boeing/Lockheed Martin is out. Developed by Phantom Works, the large diamond-shaped body, with long wings and razor-sharp nose, resembles a long-range B-2 Spirit bomber that has been retrofitted at Darth Vader&#8217;s garage: from the front, it looks kind of evil and menacing. Unlike Northrop Grumman&#8217;s proposal, which is like the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/2b149b42-f83f-4df3-b9a5-7d1d78883350.Large.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;" />The next-generation stealth bomber from Boeing/Lockheed Martin is out. Developed by Phantom Works, the large diamond-shaped body, with long wings and razor-sharp nose, resembles a long-range B-2 Spirit bomber that has been retrofitted at Darth Vader&#8217;s garage: from the front, it looks kind of evil and menacing. Unlike Northrop Grumman&#8217;s proposal, which is like the stealth bomber that eats too many Snickers.</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: stealth bombers, boeing, lockheed martin, next generation bomber, ngb, phantom works --><br />
<span id="more-306740"></span>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/4af76863-4810-4f9f-a178-33933596875a.Large.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="440" height="330" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p>
<p>Boeing Advanced Systems says that this is not a &#8220;cartoon&#8221;, but a real prototype &#8220;representative of what we&#8217;re doing&#8221;. The new bomber won&#8217;t require the development of new technologies, as they are gunning for lower costs by integrating existing ones.</p>
<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/9717dd43-bd07-420c-80ea-f54561ac20e6.Large.jpg" align="left" hspace="4" vspace="2" width="440" height="278" style="display:block;float:none;" /></p>
<p>The Northrop Grumman proposal for the NGP may seem chunkier and not so elegant, but apparently it has been designed to make room for a large weapon bay. As if throwing one nuclear bomb wasn&#8217;t enough. [<a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&#038;plckScript=blogScript&#038;plckElementId=blogDest&#038;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&#038;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3acfe7ae59-0e54-40e3-a40a-55be78ed725c">Ares</a> via <a href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/004424.html">Defense Tech</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/next_generation_stealth_bombers_jump_out_of_hyperspace-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy Scraps Plans to Build US$2.6 Billion Zumwalt Class Stealth Destroyers</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/navy_scraps_plans_to_build_26_billion_zumwalt_class_stealth_destroyers-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/navy_scraps_plans_to_build_26_billion_zumwalt_class_stealth_destroyers-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/navy_scraps_plans_to_build_26_billion_zumwalt_class_stealth_destroyers-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One place where &#8220;if you build it, they will come&#8221; doesn&#8217;t always apply is in military hardware. After constructing two Zumwalt class DD(X) stealth destroyers at US$2.6 billion apiece, the Navy has scrapped its plan to build up the rest of its intended 313-ship fleet&#8211;turns out, the demand for a ship whose primary mission is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/07/ddx_rtn_2ship.jpg" style="display:block;" />One place where &#8220;if you build it, they will come&#8221; doesn&#8217;t always apply is in military hardware. After constructing two Zumwalt class DD(X) stealth destroyers at US$2.6 billion apiece, the Navy has scrapped its plan to build up the rest of its intended <em>313-ship</em> fleet&#8211;turns out, the demand for a ship whose primary mission is to obliterate large land targets with guided artillery and Tomahawk missiles doesn&#8217;t suit the smaller-scale anti-terror missions most of the armed forces are currently faced with. Now the Pentagon just has to decide what to do with the almost $1 trillion it just freed up in its budget. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll have no problem with that. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/23/us/23brfs-NAVYTOABANDO_BRF.html?ref=us">AP</a>]</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: military, ddx, navy, ships, stealth, stealth, stealth destroyer --><br />
<span id="more-298696"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/07/navy_scraps_plans_to_build_26_billion_zumwalt_class_stealth_destroyers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>B-2 Bomber Crash Film Finally Released Publicly</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/b2_bomber_crash_film_finally_released_publicly-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/b2_bomber_crash_film_finally_released_publicly-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/b2_bomber_crash_film_finally_released_publicly-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you remember the US$1.2 billion B-2 Stealth Bomber that crashed during take-off? Well now a video has been released of the event. But let me warn you&#8212;it&#8217;s really, really hard watching so much taxpayer cash wastefully go up in flames, especially when the travesty unfolds so slowly. Apparently the plane&#8217;s sensors were fooled by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/f6d_1212714828" width="494" height="400" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" scale="showall" name="index"></embed>Do you remember the US$1.2 billion B-2 Stealth Bomber that <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/02/b2_stealth_bomber_crashes_12_billion_dollars_turn_to_smoke-2.html">crashed</a> during take-off? Well now a video has been released of the <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/04/this_is_what_a_wrecked_12_billion_b2_bomber_looks_like-2.html">event</a>. But let me warn you&mdash;it&#8217;s really, really hard watching so much taxpayer cash wastefully go up in flames, especially when the travesty unfolds so slowly. Apparently the plane&#8217;s sensors were fooled by the presence of water and convinced the vehicle to pitch up on take-off. Luckily both pilots ejected safely. [via <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/06/video-stealth-b.html">Wired</a>] </p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: , b-2, bomber, crashes, jets, planes, stealth --><br />
<span id="more-292288"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/b2_bomber_crash_film_finally_released_publicly-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50 Years of DARPA: 5 Good Inventions, 5 Lousy Ones</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/50_years_of_darpa_5_good_inventions_5_lousy_ones-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/50_years_of_darpa_5_good_inventions_5_lousy_ones-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/50_years_of_darpa_5_good_inventions_5_lousy_ones-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To commemorate the golden jubilee of America&#8217;s Defence Advance Research Projects Agency&#8212;formed these 50 years ago in response to a little traveller called Sputnik&#8212;New Scientist has come up with a short list of 10 DARPA inventions: five that changed the world, and five that fell flat:


Five Big Wins
The internet &#8211; You know, ARPANET, or a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2008/05/DARPA_50_Years.jpg" class="left" style="display:block;float:none;"/>To commemorate the golden jubilee of America&#8217;s Defence Advance Research Projects Agency&mdash;formed these 50 years ago in response to a little traveller called Sputnik&mdash;<i>New Scientist</i> has come up with a short list of 10 DARPA inventions: five that changed the world, and five that fell flat:</p>
<p><!-- Gawker Tags/Categories: arpanet, darpa, elephants, futuremap, gallium arsenide, gps, halfnium, internet, orion, project orion, psychic, speech translation, stealth, telepathy, top --><br />
<span id="more-289626"></span>
<p><b>Five Big Wins</b></p>
<p><b>The internet</b> &#8211; You know, ARPANET, or a communications network that heals thyself. The whole porn-music-movie triangle trade was not in the original blueprint.</p>
<p><b>GPS</b> &#8211; The idea that satellites up there could tell us where we are down here is as old as Sputnik, and DARPA had an attempt or two before getting it right with GPS. Again, not originally purposed for civilians and their &#8220;points of interest&#8221;&mdash;more about targeting ballistic warheads, but you know, potato, po-tah-to.</p>
<p><strong>Speech translation</strong> &#8211; Soldiers in Iraq use handheld machine translators to aid in communication with some degree of success, meaning it&#8217;s only a matter of time before some German tourists ask you to speak into the microphone.</p>
<p><strong>Stealth planes</strong> &#8211; Stealth aeroplane technology was so sneaky it even snuck up on Air Force top brass, who were apparently shocked to learn about the prototype for the original F-117.</p>
<p><strong>Gallium arsenide</strong> &#8211; Yep, some DARPA egghead discovered you can do more with arsenic than poison KGB triple-agents. It&#8217;s now found in all kinds of everyday electronics. That may not last, though, because environmentally speaking it&#8217;s still some pretty nasty stuff.</p>
<p><b>Five That Didn&#8217;t Quite Make It</b></p>
<p><strong>Hafnium bombs</strong> &#8211; DARPA put US$7 million into researching a bomb with massive initial devastation but no radioactive fallout, but alas, it didn&#8217;t ever work. Apparently if you want the good, you gotta take the bad.</p>
<p><strong>The mechanical elephant</strong> &#8211; Hannibal would have been proud of this one: During the Vietnam War, some dudes at DARPA wanted to take terrain-friendly robot elephants into the jungle. Even DARPA&#8217;s director was embarrassed.</p>
<p><strong>Telepathic spies</strong> &#8211; People who claimed psychic powers were on the receiving end of a lot of government funding in the 1970s. Even though the project was a failure, getting rich by pretending to be psychic does seem to suggest a kind of sixth sense.</p>
<p><strong>FutureMap</strong> &#8211; Apparently a bunch of Dick Cheney&#8217;s friends betting on terror targets was considered <i>grotesque</i> by some people. I&#8217;ve still got US$30K riding on Dubuque.</p>
<p><strong>Project Orion</strong> &#8211; This is a nerd favorite: it&#8217;s the spaceship powered by atomic-bomb turds. I think everyone was sad to see that one go.</p>
<p>Check out the <i>New Scientist</i> story for the real deal behind these 10 projects, and a look at some crazy projects that might make the list in the next 50 years. [<a href="http://technology.newscientist.com/article/dn13907">New Scientist</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/05/50_years_of_darpa_5_good_inventions_5_lousy_ones-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
